A taxometric analysis of psychopathy in a Chinese prison sample

PsyCh Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 924-933
Author(s):  
Fen Ren ◽  
Xiaomin Li ◽  
Gongxiang Chen ◽  
Meng‐Cheng Wang ◽  
Fangjing Xia
Keyword(s):  
Addiction ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 109 (10) ◽  
pp. 1707-1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. E. James ◽  
Claire O'Malley ◽  
Richard J. Tunney

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Ruscio ◽  
Ayelet Meron Ruscio ◽  
Lauren M. Carney
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Ferguson

BackgroundA long-standing issue in the health anxiety literature is the extent to which health anxiety is a dimensional or a categorical construct. This study explores this question directly using taxometric procedures.MethodSeven hundred and eleven working adults completed an index of health anxiety [the Whiteley Index (WI)] and indicated their current health status. Data from those who were currently healthy (n=501) and receiving no medical treatment were examined using three taxometric procedures: mean above minus below a cut (MAMBAC), maximum eigenvalue (MAXEIGEN) and L-mode factor analysis (L-MODE).ResultsGraphical representations (comparing actual to simulated data) and fit indices indicate that health anxiety is more accurately represented as a dimensional rather than a categorical construct.ConclusionsHealth anxiety is better represented as a dimensional construct. Implications for theory development and clinical practice are examined.


Author(s):  
John Ruscio ◽  
Shirley B. Wang
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace B. Boyers ◽  
Joshua J. Broman-Fulks ◽  
David P. Valentiner ◽  
Kathleen McCraw ◽  
Lisa Curtin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 694-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore E.A. Waters ◽  
Christopher R. Facompré ◽  
Adinda Dujardin ◽  
Magali Van De Walle ◽  
Martine Verhees ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1571-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID K. MARCUS ◽  
SCOTT O. LILIENFELD ◽  
JOHN F. EDENS ◽  
NORMAN G. POYTHRESS

Background. Although the DSM-IV-TR is organized into discrete disorders, the question of whether a given disorder possesses a dimensional or a categorical latent structure is an empirical one that can be examined using taxometric methods. The objective of this study was to ascertain the latent structure of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD).Method. Participants were 1146 male offenders incarcerated in state prisons (n=569), or court-ordered to residential drug treatment (n=577). Participants were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II) to assess ASPD symptoms; they also completed the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) ASPD scale. Taxometric analyses were performed to examine whether ASPD is underpinned by a discrete category or a dimensional construct.Results. Multiple taxometric procedures using two different sets of indicators provided no evidence that ASPD has a taxonic latent structure. Instead, the results were far more consistent with the proposition that ASPD exists on a continuum, regardless of whether it is assessed using a structured interview or a self-report measure.Conclusions. Evidence that ASPD is dimensional suggests that it is best studied using continuous measures and that dichotomizing individuals into ASPD versus non-ASPD groups will typically result in decreased statistical power. The findings are also consistent with a multifactorial etiology for ASPD and with recent attempts to conceptualize ASPD within the framework of extant dimensional models of personality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document