The state of the science for communication training in pediatric oncology: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica C. Kaye ◽  
Daniel Cannone ◽  
Jennifer M. Snaman ◽  
Justin N. Baker ◽  
Holly Spraker‐Perlman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Communication Training ◽  
The State ◽  
State Of The Science

What is the State of the Science on Physical Activity Interventions for Family Caregivers? A Systematic Review and RE-AIM Evaluation

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 578-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen A. Cuthbert ◽  
Kathryn King-Shier ◽  
Dean Ruether ◽  
Dianne M. Tapp ◽  
S. Nicole Culos-Reed
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Psychological Health ◽  
External Validity ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
The State ◽  
Caregiver Health ◽  
State Of The Science ◽  
Internal And External Validity

Background:Family caregivers are an important health care resource and represent a significant proportion of Canadian and US populations. Family caregivers suffer physical and psychological health problems because of being in the caregiver role. Interventions to support caregiver health, including physical activity (PA), are slow to be investigated and translated into practice.Purpose:To examine the evidence for PA interventions in caregivers and determine factors hampering the uptake of this evidence into practice.Methods:A systematic review and evaluation of internal and external validity using the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework was conducted. Randomized controlled trials or pretest/posttest studies of PA interventions were included.Results:Fourteen studies were published between 1997 and 2015. Methodological quality of studies and risk of bias was variable. External validity criteria were often not reported. Mean reporting levels were 1) reach, 53%; 2) efficacy/effectiveness, 73%; 3) adoption, 18%; 4) implementation, 48%; and 5) maintenance, 2%.Conclusions:The lack of reporting of components of internal and external validity hinders the integration of caregiver PA interventions into clinical or community settings. Researchers should focus on standardized outcomes, accepted reporting criteria, and balancing factors of internal and external validity, to advance the state of the science.

Congenital defects: An evaluation and assessment of the state of the science

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen S. Goldman ◽  
James W. Lash ◽  
Delbert Dayton ◽  
Daniel Nebert
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Congenital Defects ◽  
State Of The Science ◽  
Evaluation And Assessment

Proteomics of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1276-1287
Author(s):  
Brigida Anna Maiorano ◽  
Giovanni Schinzari ◽  
Sabrina Chiloiro ◽  
Felicia Visconti ◽  
Domenico Milardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
The State ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Rare Tumors ◽  
Personalized Approach ◽  
Future Management

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are rare tumors having usually an indolent behavior, but sometimes with unpredictable aggressiveness. PanNETs are more often non-functioning (NF), unable to produce functioning hormones, while 10-30% present as functioning (F) - PanNETs, such as insulinomas , gastrinomas , and other rare tumors. Diagnostic and prognostic markers, but also new therapeutic targets, are still lacking. Proteomics techniques represent therefore promising approaches for the future management of PanNETs. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the state of the art of proteomics in PanNETs. A total of 9 studies were included, focusing both on NF- and F-PanNETs. Indeed, proteomics is useful for the diagnosis, the prognosis and the detection of therapeutic targets. However, further studies are required. It is also warranted to standardize the analysis methods and the collection techniques, in order to validate proteins with a relevance in the personalized approach to PanNETs management.

Diversity and Group Creativity

2019 ◽  
pp. 32-49
Author(s):  
Paul B. Paulus ◽  
Karen I. van der Zee ◽  
Jared B. Kenworthy
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Group Creativity ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Integrative Framework ◽  
Group Members ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Elaboration Model ◽  
State Of The Science

It is often presumed that diversity of group members will enhance group creativity. However, the evidence for this has been mixed. This chapter summarizes the state of the science in this area and provides an integrative framework based on the categorization elaboration model of van Knippenberg and colleagues. It focuses on the factors that influence the expression of diverse perspectives, attention to such expressions, the elaboration of the shared ideas, and how these lead to creative outcomes. It evaluates the importance of identity factors in this process and discusses the potential impact on both divergent and convergent creativity. It notes some of the gaps in the literature and suggests future directions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document