Supporting “good parent” beliefs with communication: Where do we go next?

2020 ◽  
pp. e28282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan A. Sisk
Keyword(s):  
Parent Beliefs ◽  
Good Parent

scholarly journals Changes Over Time in Good-Parent Beliefs Among Parents of Children with Serious Illness: Two Year Cohort Study (TH320B)

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Douglas Hill ◽  
Jennifer Faerber ◽  
Karen Carroll ◽  
Victoria Miller ◽  
Wynne Morrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Parent Beliefs ◽  
Serious Illness ◽  
Good Parent ◽  
Changes Over Time ◽  
Over Time

scholarly journals Good-Parent Beliefs of Parents of Seriously Ill Children

2015 ◽  
Vol 169 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Feudtner ◽  
Jennifer K. Walter ◽  
Jennifer A. Faerber ◽  
Douglas L. Hill ◽  
Karen W. Carroll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parent Beliefs ◽  
Good Parent ◽  
Seriously Ill

scholarly journals “Good-Parent Beliefs”: Research, Concept, and Clinical Practice

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (6) ◽  
pp. e20194018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meaghann S. Weaver ◽  
Tessie October ◽  
Chris Feudtner ◽  
Pamela S. Hinds
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Parent Beliefs ◽  
Good Parent ◽  
Research Concept

scholarly journals Changes Over Time in Good-Parent Beliefs Among Parents of Children With Serious Illness: A Two-Year Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas L. Hill ◽  
Jennifer A. Faerber ◽  
Yimei Li ◽  
Victoria A. Miller ◽  
Karen W. Carroll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Parent Beliefs ◽  
Serious Illness ◽  
Good Parent ◽  
Changes Over Time ◽  
Over Time

Thematic expansion: A new strategy for theory development

2021 ◽  
pp. 019394592098479
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Kelly ◽  
Kathleen A. Knafl ◽  
Susan Keller ◽  
Pamela S. Hinds
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Theory Development ◽  
Good Parent ◽  
Child Study ◽  
Worked Example ◽  
New Strategy ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Purposeful Selection ◽  
Seriously Ill ◽  
Multiple Conditions

We developed and applied metasynthesis methods to expand previously reported thematic descriptions of parents’ internal definition of “being a good parent to my seriously ill child” as part of a larger study to examine parenting of children with serious illness. Our systematic approach included: literature search, purposeful selection of grounded theories regarding parenting a seriously ill child, study summaries, mapping evidence of good parent themes onto structural elements of grounded theory, cross-study comparisons, and theoretical memoing to summarize analytic insights. Twenty-five grounded theory studies from 32 reviewed reports reflected multiple conditions (n=5), countries (n=10) and family members (n=386 families). We report a worked example of the processes used to extend the original good parent themes and detail our processes through one good parent theme. The methods we describe are a promising approach to extend thematic analysis findings and advance thematic expansions toward development of more formal theoretical syntheses.

Gender and parenting: Effects of parenting failures on evaluations of mothers and fathers

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian J. Villicana ◽  
Donna M. Garcia ◽  
Monica Biernat
Keyword(s):  
Gender Stereotypes ◽  
Gender Effects ◽  
Quality Matters ◽  
Mothers And Fathers ◽  
Parent Gender ◽  
Parenting Quality ◽  
Good Parent ◽  
Subjective Judgments

Stereotypes may function as standards, such that individuals are judged relative to within-category expectations. Subjective judgments may mask stereotyping effects, whereas objective judgments may reveal stereotype-consistent patterns. We examined whether gender stereotypes about parenting lead judges to rate women and men as equally “good” parents while objective judgments favor women and whether parenting performance moderates this pattern. Participants evaluated a mother or father who successfully or unsuccessfully performed a parenting task. Subjective judgments of parent quality (“s/he is a good parent”) revealed no parent gender effects, but objective estimates of parenting performance favored mothers. In a hypothetical divorce scenario, participants also favored mothers in custody decisions. However, this pro-mother bias decreased when the mother failed at the parenting task (through her own fault). Performance did not affect custody decisions for fathers. We suggest parenting quality matters more for evaluations of mothers than for fathers because negative performance violates stereotyped expectations.

Editorial: To Be a Good Parent

1982 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-136
Author(s):  
L. F. Lowenstein
Keyword(s):  
Good Parent
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document