scholarly journals Higher plasma asparaginase activity after intramuscular than intravenous Erwinia asparaginase

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Panetta ◽  
Yiwei Liu ◽  
Hope D. Swanson ◽  
Seth E. Karol ◽  
Ching‐Hon Pui ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10031-10031
Author(s):  
Olanrewaju O Okusanya ◽  
Patricia A. Dinndorf ◽  
Julie Bullock ◽  
Bahru A. Habtemariam ◽  
Nitin Mehrotra ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2308-2308
Author(s):  
Leiah Brigitha ◽  
Marta Fiocco ◽  
Rob Pieters ◽  
Birgitte Klug Albertsen ◽  
Gabriele Escherich ◽  
...  

Abstract PURPOSE Asparaginase is a key component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. Hypersensitivity reactions challenge its use and occur frequently (30-75%) after native Escherichia. Coli (E.coli) asparaginase (Appel et al., 2008; Muller et al., 2001; Panosyan et al., 2004; Silverman et al., 2001). The international ALL Ponte di Legno Toxicity Work Group (PTWG) classifies hypersensitivity to asparaginase as (i) allergy in case of symptoms of allergy (always associated with undetectable asparaginase activity levels), (ii) allergic-like reactions in case of symptoms without inactivation, and (iii) silent inactivation (SI) with inactivation of asparaginase activity, but without hypersensitivity symptoms (Schmiegelow et al., 2016). Allergic-like reactions and SI can only be diagnosed with monitoring of asparaginase activity levels. A meta-analysis was performed based on data from the PTWG to estimate the incidence of hypersensitivity and risk factors for hypersensitivity to asparaginase in ALL protocols using pegylated E.coli asparaginase (PEGasparaginase) as first line of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Questionnaires were sent to all members of the PTWG. Information on protocol level regarding PEGasparaginase dose, dosing regimen (e.g. dosing frequency, total number of doses, PEGasparaginase-free intervals(s)), administration route, total induction and post-induction hypersensitivity rates per protocol and per risk group and use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). To facilitate comparison between protocols with and without TDM, we defined allergic reactions as the sum of allergies and allergic-like reactions. Silent inactivation was analyzed separately. RESULTS A total of 5880 patients with newly diagnosed ALL, aged 1 to 24 years old, were enrolled in seven different upfront ALL protocols using PEGasparaginase as first-line treatment. The overall incidence of allergic reactions along with 95% confidence interval (CI) were 9% [6%; 13%], 2% [1%; 3%] and 8% [5%; 11%] in the overall protocol, induction and post-induction, respectively (Figure 1). Severity of allergic reactions were described, according to the CTCAE version 3.0 or 4.03, per protocol. 47% of the reactions were classified as grade 3/4. Univariate meta-regression analysis showed a positive association between the incidence of allergic reactions and number of PEGasparaginase-free intervals (P=0.005). High risk group stratification (P<0.001), post-induction treatment phase (P<0.001) and start of PEGasparaginase treatment in post-induction (P=0.006) were also associated with a higher incidence of allergic reactions. Route of administration (IV (8.9%, range 8.6-10.5%) versus IM (6.5%, range 5.5-14.8%)) did not significantly influence risk of hypersensitivity. Number of doses, duration of first PEGasparaginase-free interval and dosage did not significantly influence risk of hypersensitivity. Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed a positive association between the incidence of allergic reactions and the number of PEGasparaginase-free intervals (P=0.006) and start of PEGasparaginase in the post-induction treatment phase (P=0.02). Two out of seven study groups reported an incidence of allergic reactions of 1.6-2.0%, which was 9-16% of all hypersensitivity. Three out of seven study groups reported an incidence of SI of 3.7-4.1%, which was 23-29% of all hypersensitivity reactions. All protocols prescribed a switch to Erwinia asparaginase in case of clinical hypersensitivity and/or SI. 308 out of 348 (89%) of the patients with hypersensitivity to PEGasparaginase received Erwinia asparaginase. 19 out of these 308 (6%) exposed patients had an allergic reaction to Erwinia asparaginase, of which 7 out of 19 (37%) were grade 3/4. CONCLUSION The incidence of allergic reactions is lower in protocols using PEGasparaginase as first-line treatment compared to that reported for native E.coli asparaginase or PEGasparaginase after native E.coli asparaginase. Post-induction phase, a higher number of PEGasparaginase-free intervals, and initiation of PEGasparaginase in post-induction phase are risk factors for allergic reactions. These results are important for planning of PEGasparaginase administrations in future frontline therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Albertsen: Erytech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; BKA: Other: Sponsor of the investigator-initiated trial NOR-GRASPALL2016.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2256-2256
Author(s):  
Wing H. Tong ◽  
Rob Pieters ◽  
Hester A. de Groot-Kruseman ◽  
Wim C.J. Hop ◽  
Joachim Boos ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose We prospectively studied the incidence and clinical course of hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia during very prolonged use of PEGasparaginase or Erwinia asparaginase in relation to asparaginase activity levels in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Also, the incidence of pancreatitis, thrombosis, hyperammonemia and central neurotoxicity and their association with asparaginase activity levels were evaluated. Patients and Methods Patients were treated according to Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG) ALL-10 medium risk intensification protocol, which includes 15 doses of PEGasparaginase (2,500 IU/m2) for 30 weeks. Erwinia asparaginase (20,000 IU/m2) was administered when an allergy to or silent inactivation of PEGasparaginase occurred. Definitions of silent inactivation of PEGasparaginase and Erwinia asparaginase were previously described (Tong et al., Blood, 2014 Mar;123(13):2026-33). Hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, hyperammonemia, pancreatitis, thrombosis and central neurotoxicity were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Changes over time of triglyceride, cholesterol, and ammonia levels were evaluated using mixed models analysis of variance (ANOVA). Changes related to age and gender were also investigated using mixed models ANOVA. The incidence of toxicities (pancreatitis, thrombosis, central neurotoxicity) related to treatment (PEGasparaginase or Erwinia asparaginase) was investigated with the Fisher's exact tests. Finally, Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the relations between triglyceride, cholesterol, and asparaginase activity levels. Results In total, 89 patients were enrolled from two pediatric oncology centers. Triglyceride, cholesterol and ammonia levels increased rapidly in children with PEGasparaginase and remained temporary elevated, but normalized after the finishing the last asparaginase dose. Hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia (grade 3/4) were found in 47% and in 25%, respectively, of the patients treated with PEGasparaginase. Studying the correlations between PEGasparaginase activity levels and triglyceride levels showed the strongest correlation at week 5 (Rs = 0.36, p=0.005). Children >= 10 years had higher triglyceride levels as compared to younger patients (< 10 years) adjusted for asparaginase preparations: median levels of 4.9 mmol/L versus 1.6 mmol/L (p<0.001). In patients receiving Erwinia asparaginase, triglyceride levels increased in the first weeks as well, but no hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia (grade 3/4) were found. Hyperammonemia (grade 3/4) was only found in Erwinia asparaginase treated patients (9%). No associations were found between pancreatitis and hypertriglyceridemia nor between ammonia and central neurotoxicity. Thrombosis occurred in 4.5%, pancreatitis in 7% and central neurotoxicity in 9% of the patients using each of both asparaginase agents; these toxicities were not related to asparaginase activity levels nor to triglyceride levels. Conclusions Severe dyslipidemia occurred frequently, but was temporary and was not associated with relevant clinical events and therefore should not be considered a reason for asparaginase treatment modifications. We show that high asparaginase activity levels are associated with high triglyceride and high cholesterol levels. However, pancreatitis, thrombosis and central neurotoxicity appear unrelated to asparaginase activity levels. Also, no associations were found between pancreatitis and hypertriglyceridemia and between ammonia level and central neurotoxicity. Table 1 Toxicity table, p-values are given for comparisons of grade 3/4 toxicities between both asparaginase agents, ns; not significant. PEGasparaginase (n=67) Erwinia asparaginase (n=22) p-value Grade 1/2 Grade 3/4 Grade 1/2 Grade 3/4 n % n % n % n % Pancreatitis 0 0 4 6 1 5 2 9 ns Hypertriglyceridemia 15 22 31 47 7 32 0 0 p<0.001 Hypercholesterolemia 6 9 17 25 8 37 0 0 p=0.01 Hyperammonemia 34 51 0 0 9 41 2 9 ns Thrombosis 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 9 ns Central neurotoxicity 0 0 7 10 0 0 1 5 ns Disclosures Tong: EUSA Pharma: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3657-3657
Author(s):  
Chitose Ogawa ◽  
Atsushi Manabe ◽  
Hiroaki Goto ◽  
Katsuyoshi Koh ◽  
Daisuke Tomizawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: L-asparaginase is an important component of multi-agent chemotherapy for children and young adults with ALL. In Japan, only one asparaginase preparation, native-E-coli-asparaginase (LeunaseR), has been approved so far by the Health, Labour and Welfare Ministry. The incidence of clinical allergy to native-E-coli -asparaginase can be more than 30% with repeated administration. To continue treatment with asparaginase, Erwinia asparaginase (ErwinaseR), deriving from Erwinia chrysanthemi, is recommended for patients who develop clinical allergy to native-E-coli-asparaginase, because the drug has no cross reactivity. We planned phase I/II trial OP-01-001 to investigate the safety and efficacy of Erwinase in combination chemotherapy consist of prednisolone, vincristine and pirarubicin. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients on this study were children and young adults with ALL/ LBL in remission, >=1 to =<25 years of age, and had developed allergy to E-coli-asparaginase. Patients with a history of pancreatitis or previous administration of Erwinase were excluded. The study was approved by IRB at each institution and patients/guardians provided informed consent/assent. In this trial regimen OP-01-001, level 1 (25,000) or level 0 (20,000 IU/m2) x 6 doses of Erwinase were planned to administer intramuscularly (IM) on day 2, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 with 40 mg/m2/day x15 days of prednisolone, 1.5mg/m2 x 3 doses of vincristine and 20 mg/m2x 2 doses of pirarubicin. In phase I, we determined the maximum tolerated dose, dose limiting toxicity (DLT), and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of Erwinase. Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic/dynamic study were evaluated in all patients. Blood samples were obtained at scheduled time points during Erwinase therapy and assayed for asparaginase activity and asparagine concentration in plasma. Primary endpoint was asparaginase activity in plasma at 48h after the first dosing. Results: A total of 24 eligible patients were enrolled to phase I/II study from February 2012 to January 2014. In phase I study, 6 eligible/evaluable patients were enrolled to level 1, starting at 25,000 IU/m2. Since all patients completed the scheduled treatments without DLT in level 1, RP2D was determined 25,000 IU/m2and 18 patients were enrolled in phase II study. PK, PD, safety and efficacy were evaluated as phase I/II study. The median age of 24 evaluated patients was 7.5 years (range 2-16) and 15 patients (62.5%) were male. In PK/PD study, one patient was excluded because essential clinical dataset was not obtained. After the first dosing, serum asparaginase activity exceeded 0.1 IU/mL in 23/23 patients (100%) at 48 hours and it did in 18/23 patients (78.3%) at 72 hours. After the sixth dosing, the activity at 72 hours was higher than 0.1 IU/mL in 19/23 (82.6%). Plasma asparagine was significantly depleted (<1.0 μM) in 22/23 (95.7%) 48 hours after the first dosing and it was also depleted in 22/23 (95.7%) 72 hours after the last dosing in all but one patients. All patients maintained remission status during the trial. No allergic reaction related to Erwinase was reported. Hypertriglyceridemia or blood triglycerides increased was reported in 12/24 (50%), 4 cases in grade 3 and 1 in grade 4. Increase in blood sugar was observed in 3 patients (12.5%), 2 in grade 1 and 1 in grade 2. In addition, 23 (95.8%) and 1 (4.2%) developed decrease in fibrinogen and increase in ammonia at grade 2-4. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and bacteremia were reported in 8 patients (33.3%) and in 1 patient (4.2%), respectively. There were no reports of hemorrhage, thrombosis, pancreatitis, or death. Conclusion: Erwinase as administered using the OP-01-001 regimen was well tolerated without unexpected toxicities and achieved good serum asparaginase activity at both 48 and 72 hours after dosing. In previous reports, a much lower dose of Erwinase at 10,000 IU/m2/dose was used in the study of EORTC (Duval M. Blood 2002;99:2734), which was subsequently assessed as suboptimal and the identical dose of erwinase at 25,000 IU/m2/dose was used in the study of COG (Salzer WL. Blood 2013;122:507). We herein showed that following allergy to E-coli native-asparaginase, erwinase 25,000 IU/m2 x 6 doses IM in 2 or 3 days interval in 2 weeks was effective and safe in children and young adults in Japan. Disclosures Ogawa: OHARA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Manabe:OHARA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Fukushima:OHARA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Horibe:OHARA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Hamada:OHARA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Employment. Ohara:OHARA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (13) ◽  
pp. 2026-2033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wing H. Tong ◽  
Rob Pieters ◽  
Gertjan J. L. Kaspers ◽  
D. Maroeska W. M. te Loo ◽  
Marc B. Bierings ◽  
...  

Key Points Use of native E coli asparaginase in induction leads to high hypersensitivity rates to PEGasparaginase in intensification. Switching to Erwinia asparaginase leads to effective asparaginase activity levels in most patients who experienced an allergy to PEGasparaginase.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2307-2307
Author(s):  
Luke Maese ◽  
Mignon L. Loh ◽  
Tong Lin ◽  
Etsuko Aoki ◽  
Michelle Zanette ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In patients with ALL, inability to receive L-asparaginase therapy due to hypersensitivity is associated with higher relapse risk (Gupta S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020). JZP458 is a recombinant Erwinia asparaginase derived from a novel Pseudomonas fluorescens expression platform to produce a reliable supply of enzyme with minimal immunologic cross-reactivity to E. coli-derived asparaginases. It has an amino acid sequence identical to that of native Erwinia asparaginase and its activity on asparagine is comparable based on in vitro measurements. This report includes initial analyses from the phase 2/3 open-label, multicenter, confirmatory pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety study (NCT04145531) of JZP458 in patients with ALL/LBL who developed hypersensitivity or silent inactivation to a long-acting E. coli-derived asparaginase. Methods: For eligible patients, each remaining course of long-acting E. coli-derived asparaginase was substituted by six doses of intramuscular (IM) JZP458 on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday (M/W/F) schedule. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was evaluated by the proportion of patients with the last 72-hr (primary endpoint) and last 48-hr (key secondary endpoint) nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) level ≥0.1 IU/mL during the first treatment course. Cohort 1a started with 25 mg/m 2 IM JZP458 (M/W/F) and Cohort 1b explored a higher dose of 37.5 mg/m 2 IM M/W/F. A preliminary population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model using Cohort 1a and 1b data predicted that a regimen of 25 mg/m 2 (M/W) and 50 mg/m 2 (F) would be optimal to support M/W/F dosing and Cohort 1c was initiated using this regimen. Results: This initial report (data cutoff of Jan 11, 2021) provides data from 102 study patients enrolled in Cohort 1a (n=33, 51.5% male), 1b (n=53, out of 87 patients enrolled, 62.3% male), and 1c (n=16, out of 52 patients enrolled, 50.0 % male). The median (range) number of courses received in Cohorts 1a, 1b, and 1c as of the data cutoff was 4 (1, 14), 3 (1, 12), and 1 (1, 2), respectively, and 53% of patients were ongoing in treatment. The mean serum asparaginase activity (SAA) levels (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for evaluable patients in Cohorts 1a, 1b, and 1c at 48 hrs were 0.4489 IU/mL (0.3720, 0.5258), 0.8376 IU/mL (0.6813, 0.9939), and 0.5085 IU/mL (0.3261, 0.6908); and at 72 hrs were 0.1543 IU/mL (0.1162, 0.1924), 0.3000IU/mL (0.2269, 0.3730), and 0.3579 IU/mL (0.2184, 0.4974). The proportion of patients achieving NSAA ≥0.1 IU/mL at 48 and 72 hr time points are presented in Table 1. PPK modeling and simulation analysis suggested that JZP458 given IM as 25 mg/m 2 on M/W and 50 mg/m 2 on F was expected to achieve NSAA levels ≥0.1 IU/mL in 99.8% of patients (95% CI: 99.6%, 100%) at 48 hours and 97.3% of patients (95% CI: 96.5%, 98.0%) at 72 hours. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of causality, occurred in 73/102 (72%) patients. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are shown in Table 2. These ADRs are consistent with the safety profile observed with other asparaginases. Conclusions: The JZP458 IM dosing regimen of 25 mg/m 2 M and W, and 50 mg/m 2 F demonstrates a positive benefit:risk profile, achieving SAA levels ≥0.1 IU/mL in &gt;90% of patients studied at both 48- and 72-hrs and a safety profile that is consistent with what has been observed in published literature on asparaginases. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Maese: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Loh: MediSix therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Aoki: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zanette: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Agarwal: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Silverman: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Choi: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Silverman: Takeda, Servier, Syndax, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raetz: Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: DSMB member. Rau: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Servier Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: Spouse is employee and stock holder.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2134-2134
Author(s):  
Wanda Salzer ◽  
Barbara Asselin ◽  
Jeffrey Supko ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Nicole Kaiser ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2134 Introduction: L-asparaginase is a vital component of multi-agent chemotherapy for children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the United States, there are 2 asparaginase preparations approved by the Food and Drug Administration, native E. coli (Elspar®) and PEG-asparaginase (Oncaspar®). PEG-asparaginase is the most commonly utilized asparaginase product due to its longer half-life and decreased immunogenicity. However, the incidence of clinical allergy to PEG-asparaginase approaches 20%, with repeated administration. Due to cross reactivity with native E. coli asparaginase, there is no FDA-approved preparation available for patients who develop clinical allergy to PEG-asparaginase. A third preparation, Erwinia asparaginase (Erwinase®), derived from Erwinia chrysanthemi, is not commercially available in the United States. The optimal dosing of Erwinase® necessary to obtain nadir asparaginase activity > 0.1 IU/mL similar to that obtained after conventional dosing of PEG-asparaginase is unknown. Patients and Methods: We hypothesized that substitution of Erwinase® 25,000 IU/m2 × 6 doses intramuscularly (IM) on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule in children and young adults with ALL would provide a 48 hour nadir serum asparaginase activity ≥ 0.1 IU/mL, and effectively deplete plasma asparagine, a surrogate marker of asparaginase activity. Eligible patients on COG study AALL07P2 were >1 to <30 years of age, concurrently enrolled on a frontline COG ALL treatment study, and had documented ≥ grade 2 allergy (NCI Common Terminology Criteria 3.0) to PEG-asparaginase. Results: A total of 55 eligible/evaluable patients were enrolled from February 2008 to April 2010. Blood samples were obtained at scheduled time points during Erwinase® therapy and assayed for serum asparaginase activity and asparagine concentration in plasma. Nadir serum asparaginase activity ≥ 0.1 IU/mL was achieved in 49/53 patients (92.5%) at 48 hours after dosing and in 46/52 patients (88.5%) at 72 hours after dosing. Plasma asparagine was significantly depleted (<1.0 μM) in all 49 patients for whom samples were satisfactorily obtained. Grade 2–3 allergic reaction and grade 1–2 hyperglycemia related to Erwinase® were reported in 5 and 3 patients, respectively. There were no reports of hemorrhage, thrombosis, pancreatitis, or death. Conclusion: Erwinase® as administered using the AALL07P2 regimen was well tolerated and achieved nadir serum asparaginase activity at both 48 and 72 hours after dosing that was similar to that achieved with PEG-asparaginase. We conclude that following allergy to PEG-asparaginase, Erwinase® 25,000 IU/m2 × 6 doses IM on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule can be substituted for a single dose of PEG-asparaginase. Disclosures: Supko: EUSA Pharma: Research Funding. Plourde: EUSA Pharma: Employment. Winick: EUSA Pharma: EUSA Advisory Board.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2634-2634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wing H. Tong ◽  
Rob Pieters ◽  
Gertjan Kaspers ◽  
Maroeska D.W.M. te Loo ◽  
Marc Bierings ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose A prospective drug monitoring study was performed to analyse the efficacy of very prolonged use of PEGasparaginase and Erwiniaasparaginase by assessing asparaginase activity, asparagine, glutamine levels and asparaginase antibodies in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Patients and Methods Children received 15 PEGasparaginase infusions (2,500 IU/m2 every other week) according to the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG)-ALL-10 medium risk intensification protocol after having received native E.coli asparaginase (5,000 IU/m2 every 3 days, 8 doses in total) in the induction course. In case of an allergy to or silent inactivation of PEGasparaginase, Erwinia asparaginase (20,000 IU/m22x-3x per week) was given. All asparaginase preparations were administered intravenously in one hour. Serum asparaginase activity, asparagine, glutamine levels and asparaginase antibodies were measured. Results 89 patients were enrolled in two centers to monitor the PEGasparaginase courses. 62/89 (70%) patients without clinical allergy to and without silent inactivation of PEGasparaginase had serum mean trough activity levels of 899 U/L which were much higher than requested. 20/89 (22%) of the patients showed an allergy and 7/89 (8%) silent inactivation in intensification. All 20 allergic patients (grade 1-4 Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events) showed PEGasparaginase activity levels of zero. This was not due to the fact that the PEGasparaginase infusion was stopped, as 18 patients showed their allergic reactions at the second dose whereas the serum asparaginase activity level after the first full dose already appeared to be zero in all 18 cases. Moreover, in 4 patients with grade 1 allergy, the second full PEGasparaginase dose was given with pre-treatment of clemastine and hydrocortisone, also resulting in unmeasurable serum activity levels of PEGasparaginase. 59 children from 7 centers with allergy to or silent inactivation of PEGasparaginase who were switched to Erwinia asparaginase were enrolled to monitor the Erwiniaasparaginase courses. Only 2/59 (3%) of the patients developed an allergy to Erwinia asparaginase. No patients with silent inactivation of Erwinia asparaginase were seen. Of the non-allergic Erwinia asparaginase patients, 55/57 (96%) had at least one serum Erwinia asparaginase trough activity level ≥ 100 U/L and 57/57 (100%) ≥ 50 U/L. In 65% and 85% of all samples had serum trough activity levels ≥ 100 U/L and ≥ 50 U/L, respectively. In 33% of patients, the administration frequency could be reduced from 3 times to 2 times per week based upon serum Erwinia asparaginase activity levels ≥ 100 U/L at 72 hours. Serum asparagine level was strongly depleted, but not always completely depleted in Erwinia asparaginase treated patients in contrast to PEGasparaginase. Serum glutamine level was slightly lowered by Erwiniaasparaginase, but no glutamine depletion was observed with both compounds. The presence of serum asparaginase antibodies is related to allergy to and silent inactivation of asparaginase, but predicting asparaginase allergy or silent inactivation is clinically not applicable because of the low specificity, 64% (95%-CI: 43%-82%). Conclusion The use of native E.coli asparaginase in induction leads to 22% allergy and 8% silent inactivation rates of PEGasparaginase in intensification. Therefore, PEGasparaginase should be used upfront already in the induction course instead of native E.coli asparaginase. The dose of PEGasparaginase of 2,500 IU/m2 can be lowered. Switching to Erwinia asparaginase in case of allergy to or silent inactivation of PEGasparaginase leads to effective asparaginase activity levels in the majority of patients. Measuring serum asparaginase activity levels to monitor efficacy of asparaginase is preferred over serum asparagine levels and serum asparaginase antibodies. Therapeutic drug monitoring has now been implemented to individualize PEGasparaginase and Erwinia asparaginase dose and to detect silent inactivation in the current DCOG-ALL-11 protocol. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Haematologica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  
pp. 1716-1721 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Tong ◽  
R. Pieters ◽  
H. A. de Groot-Kruseman ◽  
W. C. J. Hop ◽  
J. Boos ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Lynda M. Vrooman ◽  
Yael Flamand ◽  
Victoria Koch ◽  
Melissa A. Burns ◽  
Sarah M. Cronholm ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hypersensitivity reactions with asparaginase occur frequently in pediatric patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The standard approach for pts with reaction to E.coli-derived asparaginase is to switch to Erwinia asparaginase, given concern that clinical reactions reflect presence of neutralizing antibodies; however, Erwinia requires more frequent dosing and is often unavailable. Therapeutic drug monitoring allows for discrimination between pts with pegaspargase hypersensitivity who have sub-therapeutic asparaginase activity and those still able to derive therapeutic benefit from pegaspargase. We prospectively piloted re-challenging pts with pegaspargase after initial Grade 2 hypersensitivity to this agent, with premedication at re-challenge and assessment of serum asparaginase activity (SAA). Methods: Pts aged 1 to &lt; 22 years with newly diagnosed ALL were eligible for DFCI 16-001. Pts received 1 dose of intravenous pegaspargase during Induction, and every 2 weeks for 15 total doses in Post-Induction phases, without routine premedication. Pts were monitored during/after pegaspargase for allergy, with CTCAE version 4.0 event grading. Those with ≥Grade 3 allergy discontinued pegaspargase and were switched to Erwinia. Those with Grade 2 allergic reaction were eligible for pegaspargase re-challenge with pre-medication (acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, and hydrocortisone, or per institutional standard) and slower infusion rate. If &lt; 50% of the intended dose had been administered when reaction occurred, re-challenge was within 1-7 days of initial reaction. If ≥ 50% of the intended dose had been given, re-challenge was at next planned pegaspargase dose. SAA was measured 1-hour, 7-days, and 14-days after the re-challenge infusion (if dose completed). If 1-hour or 7-day level ≥ 0.1 IU/mL, and 14-day level ≥ 0.025 IU/mL, SAA was considered adequate, and the pt continued to receive pegaspargase with premedication. Pts with an inadequate SAA level, or with new ≥ Grade 2 allergic reaction with the re-challenge dose were considered to have failed re-challenge and were changed to Erwinia (or enrolled on a clinical trial of recombinant crisantaspase, an alternative Erwinia preparation). Results: Between 3/2017- 7/2020, 317 eligible pts enrolled. Overall, 81 of 299 (27%) total evaluable pts experienced a first allergic reaction to pegaspargase, 68 pts with Grade 2 reaction, 13 with Grade ≥3. During Induction, 17 of 299 (6%) evaluable pts had allergic reaction to pegaspargase; all Grade 2. Of the 17 Grade 2 reactions, 13 pts (76%) underwent re-challenge in Induction, 9 (69%) re-challenges successful and 4 failed. Post-Induction, 64 of 241 evaluable pts (27%) had a first allergic reaction; 51 Grade 2 and 13 Grade ≥3. Thirty-six of 51 (71%) pts with Grade 2 allergy during Post-Induction underwent re-challenge, as did 1 additional pt with allergy during Induction who was re-challenged with first Post-Induction pegaspargase dose (per protocol guideline, due to receiving ≥50% of Induction dose). Among these re-challenges, 16 were successful, 21 failed. Overall, 25 of 50 (50%) pts who were re-challenged after Grade 2 reaction had a successful challenge and were able to continue pegaspargase. Among the 25 pts with failed re-challenge, 6 pts (24%) had inadequate SAA alone as cause of failure, 17 pts (68%) had an allergic reaction with the re-challenge dose, and 2 (8%) additional patients had both allergic reaction and documented inadequate SAA. Three pts who were successfully re-challenged had a subsequent allergic reaction to pegaspargase. Among the 22 pts who experienced another allergic reaction with pegaspargase (at re-challenge or subsequent dose), 19 pts (86%) experienced Grade 2, and 3 pts experienced Grade 3 reaction. Conclusion: Fifty percent of pts with a Grade 2 reaction to pegaspargase were able to tolerate and achieve adequate SAA when re-challenged with premedication. For those who did react with or after re-challenge, reactions were not more severe. The re-challenge approach limits premedication exposure only to a minority of pts with a history of prior reaction and substantially decreases the number of pts needing to switch to Erwinia asparaginase, which can be challenging to deliver due to administration schedule and drug shortage. Disclosures Place: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Institutional Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy. Silverman:Takeda: Other: advisory board; Servier: Other: advisory board; Syndax: Other: advisory board.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document