scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators of clinical trial enrollment in a network of community‐based pediatric oncology clinics

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Russo ◽  
Linda Stout ◽  
Toni House ◽  
Victor M. Santana
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment

scholarly journals Strategies to facilitate shared decision-making about pediatric oncology clinical trial enrollment: A systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 1157-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eden G. Robertson ◽  
Claire E. Wakefield ◽  
Christina Signorelli ◽  
Richard J. Cohn ◽  
Andrea Patenaude ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Oncology Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment

scholarly journals The Development of Delta: Using Agile to Develop a Decision Aid for Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial Enrollment (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eden G Robertson ◽  
Claire E Wakefield ◽  
Richard J Cohn ◽  
Tracey O'Brien ◽  
David S Ziegler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Oncology Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment

scholarly journals Psychosocial Barriers and Facilitators to Clinical Trial Enrollment and Adherence for Adolescents With Cancer

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 133 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S123-S130 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Buchanan ◽  
R. Block ◽  
A. W. Smith ◽  
E. Tai
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Psychosocial Barriers ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment

scholarly journals Exploring barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment in the context of sickle cell anemia and hydroxyurea

2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 1333-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Lebensburger ◽  
Robert F. Sidonio ◽  
Michael R. DeBaun ◽  
Monika M. Safford ◽  
Thomas H. Howard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Sickle Cell Anemia ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment

scholarly journals Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: Identifying opportunities for intervention

Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Siembida ◽  
Holli A. Loomans‐Kropp ◽  
Neha Trivedi ◽  
Ann O’Mara ◽  
Lillian Sung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment

Clinical trial enrollment expansion to the community.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Judith Kostka ◽  
Jessica A. Zerillo ◽  
Andrea Kruse ◽  
Natalie Faye Sinclair ◽  
Maureen Patrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Training Session ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Pareto Chart ◽  
Main Campus ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment

112 Background: Oncology patients at community cancer practices generally do not access clinical trials to the same degree as patients at academic medical centers. Collaborations between research and clinical teams across academic hospitals and their affiliated community sites may help to improve this disparity. Methods: To improve clinical trial enrollment, a multidisciplinary team of research and clinical staff from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute main campus and a community-based satellite site implemented a program to enhance identification of breast cancer patients eligible for clinical trials. The team constructed a process map, cause and effect diagram and collected diagnostic data, which was displayed with a Pareto chart. Process control charts were used to track data over time. Interventions included: (1) a web-based tool to pre-screen patients for community and main campus trials, (2) a training session for clinicians on trial communication skills, (3) designated clinician visits for follow-up trial discussions, and (4) research nurse telephone calls after the initial consultation. Results: Before the program (7/14-10/14), research staff screened 83% of new breast cancer patients for clinical trials, which increased to 97% after the program (11/14-9/15) (p < 0.001). There was not a significant change in trials presented to eligible patients or enrollment in trials. Conclusions: The proportion of patients identified for clinical trials increased and there was numeric improvement in the proportion of eligible patients presented trials. There was an increase in clinical trial enrollment that did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to the low sample size. These results suggest that the interventions would benefit from further modification and use. The project demonstrates the challenges and opportunities inherent in growing successful clinical trial programs in community-based satellite sites. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document