scholarly journals Practice patterns of palliative radiation therapy in pediatric oncology patients in an international pediatric research consortium

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. e26589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avani Dholakia Rao ◽  
Qinyu Chen ◽  
Ralph P. Ermoian ◽  
Sara R. Alcorn ◽  
Maria Luisa S. Figueiredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Pediatric Research ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Palliative Radiation ◽  
International Pediatric ◽  
Palliative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Research Consortium

Clinical practice patterns for advanced breast cancer patients on CDK4/6 inhibitors receiving palliative radiation therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Neda Stjepanovic ◽  
Sonal Gandhi ◽  
William Tran ◽  
Alia Thawer ◽  
Ellen Warner
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Concurrent Administration ◽  
Palliative Radiation ◽  
Palliative Radiation Therapy

269 Background: Patients with hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) often require palliative radiation therapy (RT) while receiving systemic treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding whether concurrent administration of CDK4/6i and RT increases RT or hematologic toxicity and there are currently no formal guidelines for this realm. A Canadian national survey was conducted to evaluate local practice patterns of CDK4/6i management during palliative RT. Methods: An anonymized online survey was distributed to 162 Canadian breast cancer health care professionals between November 2020 and January 2021. The survey collected provider demographics and questions regarding practice, experiences and opinions on CDK4/6i management during palliative RT for ABC. Results: The survey was completed by 76 (47%) of the invited participants: 40% were medical oncologists, 26% radiation oncologists, 16% pharmacists and 18% nurses, physician assistants or radiation therapists. Nine provinces were represented. The respondents' clinical practice settings were predominantly at an academic/cancer centre (84%), while 16% of clinicians were based at a community setting. Interrupting the CDK4/6i during RT was recommended always by 21% of respondents, sometimes by 46% and never by 9%, while 24% had no opinion. The majority of opinions were based on personal experience (55%), colleagues’ practice (37%), medical literature (33%) and experience with chemotherapy agents (18%). Unexpected RT toxicity observed in patients on concomitant CDK4/6i was reported by 9% of respondents and prolonged cytopenias by 15%. Among responders who always or sometimes interrupt CDK4/6i during palliative RT, the timeframe to hold CDK4/6i prior to RT was 4-7 days 45%, 1-3 days 32%, 8-14 days 13% and 10% were unsure. Responses were similar for the timeframe used to resume the drug after RT. The majority (94%) thought that advising the patient on what to do with the CDK4/6i during RT was the role of the Medical Oncologist, while 48% also thought it was the role of the Radiation Oncologist. 23% of respondents though the patient should always be reassessed prior to restarting the CDK4/6i; 45% said sometimes, and 29% said not necessary. 82% of respondents indicated a standardized protocol or guideline would be valuable in this setting. Conclusions: Two thirds of Canadian breast cancer specialists sometimes or routinely interrupt CDK4/6i treatment during RT with 15% having observed increased toxicity with concurrent administration. Consensus guidelines for the management of CDK4/6i and RT are necessary to reduce treatment variability and improve the quality and safety of care for these patients.

scholarly journals Safety and clinical activity of intratumoral MEDI9197 alone and in combination with durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Siu ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
Shilpa Gupta ◽  
Aurélien Marabelle ◽  
Antonio Jimeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Palliative Radiation ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Palliative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundMEDI9197 is an intratumorally administered toll-like receptor 7 and 8 agonist. In mice, MEDI9197 modulated antitumor immune responses, inhibited tumor growth and increased survival. This first-time-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated MEDI9197 with or without the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced solid tumors.Patients and methodsEligible patients had at least one cutaneous, subcutaneous, or deep-seated lesion suitable for intratumoral (IT) injection. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. Patients received IT MEDI9197 0.005–0.055 mg with or without RT (part 1), or IT MEDI9197 0.005 or 0.012 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous with or without RT (part 3), in 4-week cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1. Exploratory endpoints included tumor and peripheral biomarkers that correlate with biological activity or predict response.ResultsFrom November 2015 to March 2018, part 1 enrolled 35 patients and part 3 enrolled 17 patients; five in part 1 and 2 in part 3 received RT. The maximum tolerated dose of MEDI9197 monotherapy was 0.037 mg, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cytokine release syndrome in two patients (one grade 3, one grade 4) and 0.012 mg in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg with DLT of MEDI9197-related hemorrhagic shock in one patient (grade 5) following liver metastasis rupture after two cycles of MEDI9197. Across parts 1 and 3, the most frequent MEDI9197-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fever (56%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (21%). The most frequent MEDI9197-related grade ≥3 events were decreased lymphocytes (15%), neutrophils (10%), and white cell counts (10%). MEDI9197 increased tumoral CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells, inducing type 1 and 2 interferons and Th1 response. There were no objective clinical responses; 10 patients in part 1 and 3 patients in part 3 had stable disease ≥8 weeks.ConclusionIT MEDI9197 was feasible for subcutaneous/cutaneous lesions but AEs precluded its use in deep-seated lesions. Although no patients responded, MEDI9197 induced systemic and intratumoral immune activation, indicating potential value in combination regimens in other patient populations.Trial registration numberNCT02556463.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document