Preparing childhood cancer survivors for transition to adult care: The young adult perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. e26544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha N. Frederick ◽  
Sharon L. Bober ◽  
Lexie Berwick ◽  
Mary Tower ◽  
Lisa B. Kenney
Author(s):  
Giulia Zucchetti ◽  
Simona Bellini ◽  
Marina Bertolotti ◽  
Eleonora Biasin ◽  
Enrico Brignardello ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundTo provide successful transfer from childhood to adult-oriented healthcare is one of the priorities of survivorship care plans.PurposeThis study describes adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors’ conditions at the moment of the transition to adult care deepening their biological, psychological, social and assistant state and their associations with socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.MethodsA biopsychosocial check-list in four health domains (biological, psychological, social and assistant) was filled in by healthcare professionals (oncologists, psychologists, social workers and nurses) through qualitative interviews and clinical observations of 79 survivors (58% boys; Mage= 20 years old) at the moment of the transition from the Pediatric Oncology Unit to the Transition Unit of the Childhood Cancer Survivors.ResultsAt the moment of transition, 38% of survivors showed a positive condition in all the four health domains without any kind of impairment. Biological (37%) and psychological areas (44%) were found to be those with major incidence of impairments. Association phenomena were found between psychological and social condition (p < 0.05) and between social and assistant condition (p < 0.05). Biological condition was also significantly associated with the type of cancer (χ = 6,2414, p < 0.05).ConclusionAlthough many survivors entered in adult care system without any impairment, the biopsychosocial approach highlighted that there is a presence of impairments in at least one of the main health domains.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Quillen ◽  
Holli Bradley ◽  
Christina Calamaro

The aim of this study was to identify and describe barriers of young adult childhood cancer survivors transitioning to adult health care within 5 years of leaving a pediatric oncology practice. Several barriers have been identified in the literature, but other obstacles as to why this vulnerable population may be avoiding health care are unknown. This is a descriptive pilot study of a convenience sample of childhood cancer survivors, currently 20 to 25 years of age, who were diagnosed at less than 21 years of age. The Transition to Adult Care Survey assessing survivor barriers is an online survey consisting of 15 questions, with a drop-down menu for answers and 2 open-ended questions. The survey was accessible by smartphone or computer. Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe variables of interest. Our population consisted of 48 childhood cancer survivors. Their mean age was 23.21 years. Only 74% reported following through with annual preventive screening, and 57% reported that they consider themselves at risk for further medical problems as a result of their cancer treatment. Lack of knowledge of the importance of health screening may be a potential barrier to consistent follow-up care.


Author(s):  
L. M. E. van Erp ◽  
H. Maurice-Stam ◽  
L. C. M. Kremer ◽  
W. J. E. Tissing ◽  
H. J. H. van der Pal ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to increase our understanding of the psychosocial well-being of young adult childhood cancer survivors (YACCS) as well as the positive and negative impacts of cancer. Methods YACCS (aged 18–30, diagnosed ≤ 18, time since diagnosis ≥ 5 years) cross-sectionally filled out the “Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Young Adults” (PedsQL-YA), “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” (HADS), and “Checklist Individual Strengths” (CIS-20R) to measure fatigue and survivor-specific “Impact of Cancer - Childhood Survivors” (IOC-CS), which measures the long-term impact of childhood cancer in several domains. Descriptive statistics (IOC-CS), logistic regression (HADS, CIS-20R), and ANOVA (PedsQL-YA, HADS, CIS-20R) were performed. Associations between positive and negative impacts of childhood cancer and psychosocial outcomes were examined with linear regression analyses. Results YACCS (N = 151, 61.6% female, mean age 24.1 ± 3.6, mean time since diagnosis 13.6 ± 3.8) reported lower HRQOL (− .4 ≤ d ≤ − .5, p ≤ .001) and more anxiety (d = .4, p ≤ .001), depression (d = .4, p ≤ .01), and fatigue (.3 ≤ d ≤ .5, p ≤ .001) than young adults from the general Dutch population. They were at an increased risk of experiencing (sub)clinical anxiety (OR = 1.8, p = .017). YACCS reported more impact on scales representing a positive rather than negative impact of CC. Various domains of impact of childhood cancer were related to psychosocial outcomes, especially “Life Challenges” (HRQOL β = − .18, anxiety β = .36, depression β = .29) and “Body & Health” (HRQOL β = .27, anxiety β = − .25, depression β = − .26, fatigue β = − .47). Conclusion YACCS are vulnerable to psychosocial difficulties, but they also experience positive long-term impacts of childhood cancer. Positive and negative impacts of childhood cancer were associated with psychosocial outcomes in YACCS. Screening of psychosocial outcomes and offering targeted interventions are necessary to optimize psychosocial long-term follow-up care for YACCS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beeshman S. Nandakumar ◽  
◽  
Joanna E. Fardell ◽  
Claire E. Wakefield ◽  
Christina Signorelli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24180-e24180
Author(s):  
Jenna Sopfe ◽  
Rebekah Marsh ◽  
Leslie C. Appiah ◽  
James L. Klosky ◽  
Pamela N Peterson ◽  
...  

e24180 Background: Up to half of adolescent and young adult (AYA) childhood cancer survivors (CCS) experience sexual dysfunction (SD) as a result cancer or its treatment. SD in CCS is under-recognized, with low levels of routine screening due to barriers such as discomfort, time, and awareness. This study explores solutions to these barriers by describing AYA CCS preferences for implementation of screening for SD and evaluating the utility of a validated adult screening tool (PROMIS SexFS Brief) in this population. Methods: 16 AYA CCS (aged 15-24 years) completed semi-structured interviews followed by questionnaire completion. Interviews explored patients’ prior experiences with SD screening, along with preferences for screening type (e.g., discussion, screening tool), delivery modality, and timing. Patients then completed the PROMIS SexFS Brief while verbalizing their thoughts and providing open-ended responses to each item. Transcribed interviews were inductively coded and analyzed, guided by content analysis methodology. Results: This analysis represents 2/3 of planned interviews, and all will be completed by April 1, 2020. Interviews were performed with 11 females and 5 males (median age 21). Preliminary analysis demonstrates that participants had minimal experience with SD conversations, but had preferences regarding by whom, how, and when screening/education should occur. Who: Participants felt providers should have preexisting rapport with their patients; preferences existed for provider role and sex/age. How: A combination of written materials and in-person conversations was preferred. Several acknowledged a desire to have a “warning” that the conversation would happen, such as through a questionnaire. Participants did not have a preference regarding delivery modality (paper vs. online). The PROMIS SexFS Brief appeared to demonstrate content validity and acceptability in AYA CCS. When: Participants wanted education and screening to occur regularly throughout cancer therapy and survivorship. SD conversations should be tailored developmentally to the patient. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a theme throughout interviews of the importance of patient/provider rapport. Further, while AYA CCS prefer in-person conversations about SD, conversations should be preceded by written information or a questionnaire to increase patient preparedness/comfort. Preliminary findings suggest that the PROMIS SexFS Brief is a promising tool for screening SD in this population; further studies evaluating use in clinical settings is warranted.


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. e26354 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Fardell ◽  
C. E. Wakefield ◽  
C. Signorelli ◽  
R. Hill ◽  
J. Skeen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa B. Kenney ◽  
Patrice Melvin ◽  
Laurie N. Fishman ◽  
Joanne O'Sullivan-Oliveira ◽  
Gregory S. Sawicki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document