Flow cytometric analysis as an additional predictive tool of treatment response in children with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. e26478
Author(s):  
Haruko Shima ◽  
Nobutaka Kiyokawa ◽  
Masashi Miharu ◽  
Akihiko Tanizawa ◽  
Hidemitsu Kurosawa ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Nur OGUZ DAVUTOGLU ◽  
Eren GUNDUZ ◽  
Fatih YAMAN ◽  
Serap ARSLAN ◽  
Oğuz ÇİLİNGİR ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 680-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kar Fai Chow ◽  
Deborah W. Sevilla ◽  
Adriana I. Colovai ◽  
Govind Bhagat ◽  
Bachir Alobeid

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3084-3084
Author(s):  
Noriyoshi Iriyama ◽  
Tomoiku Takaku ◽  
Eriko Sato ◽  
Maho Ishikawa ◽  
Tomonori Nakazato ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aim: Therapy-related chronic myeloid leukemia (TR-CML), which is defined as CML that developed after exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, rarely exists in clinical practice, although its incidence rates are relatively lower than those of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes, accounting for 1.2-30.4% of secondary leukemias. The clinical behavior of TR-CML, including patient outcome, is reportedly not different from that of de novo CML before the era of imatinib treatment. While the recent advancement of CML treatment by the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has dramatically improved treatment outcomes in patients with CML, little is known about the treatment response and outcomes in patients with TR-CML treated with TKI. In this regard, we investigated the clinical entity of TR-CML in the era of TKIs, including treatment response to TKI and prognosis, in patients enrolled to the CML Cooperative Study Group. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients enrolled in the CML Cooperative Study to identify patients diagnosed with TR-CML. This study included patients aged >15 years who were diagnosed with CML in the chronic phase between April 2001 and January 2016, and treated with any TKIs as initial therapy and followed up for at least 3 months. The study was approved by the research ethics board of each institution and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. A major molecular response (MMR) was defined as ≤0.1% on the International Scale (IS) or 100 copies of the BCR-ABL1 transcript/μg RNA in a transcription-mediated amplification and hybridization protection assay. A deep molecular response (DMR) was defined ≤0.0032% in the IS. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the period from the date of initial treatment with TKI to the date of onset of the first adverse event (loss of treatment efficacy, progression to the accelerated or blastic phase, or any cause of death) or the last follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed by using EZR. Results and Discussion: We identified 308 patients with newly diagnosed CML in the chronic phase, including 11 (3.6%) with TR-CML and 297 with de novo CML. Regarding the primary cancer, 2 of the 11 patients had breast cancer and the remaining 9 had prostate cancer, pharyngeal cancer, mesothelioma, lung cancer, colon cancer, ureter cancer, acute leukemia, gastric cancer, or bladder cancer, respectively. Eight cases were treated with chemotherapy, 2 were treated with radiotherapy, and the remaining case was treated with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The results of a cytogenetic analysis by G-banding were exclusive t(9;22)(q34;q11) in all the patients. The median time to diagnosis of CML from the initiation of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was 7 years (range, 1.2-33 years). No significant differences in patient age, sex, white blood cell count, hemoglobin level, platelet count, or European Treatment and Outcome Study risk were observed between the TR-CML and de novo CML groups. Among the patients whose cytogenetic and/or molecular responses were assessable, all had excellent treatment response to TKI. Seven patients unexpectedly reached MMR within 6 months after TKI initiation. Finally, 8 patients attained DMR or undetectable leukemia in the bone marrow and the remaining 3 attained MMR. The 5-year EFS of the patients in the de novo CML group was 90%. None of the patients in the TR-CML group experienced any adverse event. In conclusion, in the present study, we revealed that patients with TR-CML could attain a good clinical course with TKI therapy. Detailed investigations of TR-CML may provide new insights into the CML biology. Disclosures Iriyama: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Takaku:Bristol: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Nakazato:Mundipharma KK: Research Funding. Fujita:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,LTD: Honoraria. Tokuhira:Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd: Honoraria; Pfizer Co., Ltd: Honoraria; Eizai Co., Ltd: Honoraria. Kawaguchi:Novartis: Honoraria.


2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 899-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil K. Tripathi ◽  
Rupesh Chaturvedi ◽  
Rizwan Ahmad ◽  
Mohd Asim ◽  
Kamal K. Sawlani ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1239-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hana Klamova ◽  
Daniela Zackova ◽  
Edgar Faber ◽  
Katerina Steinerova ◽  
Michal Karas ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1239 Background. Imatinib (IM), a selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a treatment of choice for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) in chronic phase (CP) as it was shown in the IRIS trial. The treatment strategy and response evaluation is based on NCCN or ELN guidelines. Only limited “real life” data of IM impact on pts outcome as well as ELN (European LeukemiaNet) recommendations applicability in daily practice has been published. In the Czech as well as in the Slovak Republic (15 million inhabitants), the treatment of CML patients is centralized in overall 13 centers, capable carrying on both the treatment and laboratory monitoring. There are two CML prospective projects CAMELIA and INFINITY focused on CML pts analysis. Aims. To analyze the treatment response and long-term outcome in consecutive, unselected patients with CP-CML treated with IM and to evaluate the prognostic role of ELN 2006 and 2009 response evaluation. To analyze molecular response in more detail. Methods. Altogether 458 consecutively included patients in INFINITY (152 pts) and CAMELIA projects (306 pts) were assessed. For the treatment response evaluation the ELN 2006 and ELN 2009 definitions were used. We assessed rates and the cumulative incidences of complete hematologic responses (CHR), complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR), major (MMoR) and complete molecular responses (CMoR). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the start of IM to death from any cause, overall survival CML-related death (OSCML), transformation-free survival (TFS) as survival without evidence of AP or BP or death from any cause, progression-free survival (PFS) as survival without evidence of AP or BP, loss of CHR, MCyR, increasing white blood cell count or death fron any cause while on IM treatment and event-free survival (EFS) –events defined as a progression (the same as in PFS, as described above), loss of CCyR, failure to achieve CHR at 6 months, MCyR at 12 months and CCyR at 18 months, or intolerance of IM as the cause its discontinution. The patient survival according to MMoR achievement and the cumulative incidence of MMoR according to different BCR-ABL ratio within the first 3 months of IM therapy was analysed. Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence methods and log rank test were used for survival statistic analysis. Results. A total of 458 patients (median age 52 year;17-81) treated with IM between 2003–2009 were analysed.The median follow-up was 33.1 months (1.4-82.1). At 2 and 4 years the cumulative incidence of CHR was 90.9% and 94.7%, CCyR 64.9% and 76%, MMR 52.4% and 68.1% and CMR 24.5% and 43%, respectively. In 4 years estimated OS was 91.1%, OSCML 96.6%, TFS 93.9%, PFS 83.2% and EFS 66%. According to ELN 2006 criteria the optimal response (OR) by 6 months (defined as PCyR) and by 12 months (defined as CCyR) resp. had significant impact on PFS (p=0.04 and p<0.001 resp.). The optimal reponse by 3 months (defined as CHR) had significant impact on TFS (p<0.001). According to actualized criteria in ELN 2009, the new definition of optimal response in the 3rd month - at least minor cytogenetic response (mCyR), did not show any prognostic impact on PFS. The achievement of MMoR was correlated with the significant improvement in PFS in the 3rd month (p=0.039) as well as in the 12th month (p<0.049). There was significant improvement in EFS for patients in MMoR in all timepoints (p<0.003, <0.001, <0.001, <0.005). The BCR-ABL ratio lower than 1% within the first 3 months was associated with MMoR achievement in higher number of patients in comparison to patients with higher BCR-ABL levels (p<0.001) Conclusion. The excellent and long-lasting efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of CP-CML in non-selected group of patients treated in the defined region was confirmed. Our results are comparable to those achieved in IRIS trial. Response criteria and their predictive role defined by ELN 2006 and 2009 seems to be helpful at some time points, but the ELN 2009 modification does not seem to represent significant improvement compared to ELN 2006. On the other hand based on the present analysis the earlier incorporation of molecular response into the evaluation scheme may be beneficial. Supported by: CELL-The Czech Leukemia Study Group for Life, Project INFINITY; Project CAMELIA. Disclosures: Faber: BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document