scholarly journals Patient/parent perspectives on genomic tumor profiling of pediatric solid tumors: The Individualized Cancer Therapy (iCat) experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 1974-1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Marron ◽  
Steven G. DuBois ◽  
Julia Glade Bender ◽  
AeRang Kim ◽  
Brian D. Crompton ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Marron ◽  
Angel M. Cronin ◽  
Steven G. DuBois ◽  
Julia Glade-Bender ◽  
AeRang Kim ◽  
...  

Purpose Increasing use of genomic tumor profiling may blur the line between research and clinical care. We aimed to describe perspectives of research participants about the purpose of genomic tumor profiling research in pediatric oncology. Methods We surveyed 45 participants (response rate, 85%) in a pilot study of genomic profiling in pediatric solid tumors at four academic cancer centers after the return of sequencing results. We defined understanding according to a one-item (basic) definition (recognition that the primary purpose was not to improve the patient’s treatment) and a four-item (comprehensive) definition (primary purpose was not to improve patient’s treatment; primary purpose was to improve treatment of future patients; there may not be direct medical benefit; most likely result of participation was not increased likelihood of cure). Results Sixty-eight percent of respondents (30 of 44 respondents) demonstrated basic understanding of the study purpose; 55% (24 of 44 respondents) demonstrated comprehensive understanding. Understanding was more frequently seen in those with higher education and greater genetic knowledge according to basic (81% v 50% [ P = .05]; and 82% v 46% [ P = .03], respectively) and comprehensive (73% v 28% [ P = .01]; 71% v 23% [ P = .01]) definitions. Ninety-three percent of respondents who believed the primary purpose was to improve the patient’s care simultaneously stated that the research also aimed to benefit future patients. Conclusion Most participants in pediatric tumor profiling research understand that the primary goal of this research is to improve care for future patients, but many express dual goals when they participate in sequencing research. Some populations demonstrate increased rates of misunderstanding. Nuanced participant views suggest that additional work is needed to assess and improve participant understanding, particularly as tumor sequencing moves beyond research and into clinical practice.


Author(s):  
Lin Xiao ◽  
Harrison Yeung ◽  
Michelle Haber ◽  
Murray D. Norris ◽  
Klaartje Somers

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2796
Author(s):  
Aicha E. Quamine ◽  
Mallery R. Olsen ◽  
Monica M. Cho ◽  
Christian M. Capitini

Treatment of metastatic pediatric solid tumors remain a significant challenge, particularly in relapsed and refractory settings. Standard treatment has included surgical resection, radiation, chemotherapy, and, in the case of neuroblastoma, immunotherapy. Despite such intensive therapy, cancer recurrence is common, and most tumors become refractory to prior therapy, leaving patients with few conventional treatment options. Natural killer (NK) cells are non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted lymphocytes that boast several complex killing mechanisms but at an added advantage of not causing graft-versus-host disease, making use of allogeneic NK cells a potential therapeutic option. On top of their killing capacity, NK cells also produce several cytokines and growth factors that act as key regulators of the adaptive immune system, positioning themselves as ideal effector cells for stimulating heavily pretreated immune systems. Despite this promise, clinical efficacy of adoptive NK cell therapy to date has been inconsistent, prompting a detailed understanding of the biological pathways within NK cells that can be leveraged to develop “next generation” NK cell therapies. Here, we review advances in current approaches to optimizing the NK cell antitumor response including combination with other immunotherapies, cytokines, checkpoint inhibition, and engineering NK cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) for the treatment of pediatric solid tumors.


Cancer ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 644-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Garrett ◽  
Christine E. Fuller ◽  
Victor M. Santana ◽  
Stephen J. Shochat ◽  
Fredric A. Hoffer

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana C. Baiu ◽  
Ian R. Marsh ◽  
Alexander E. Boruch ◽  
Ankita Shahi ◽  
Saswati Bhattacharya ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. e26613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navin Pinto ◽  
Julie R. Park ◽  
Erin Murphy ◽  
Jennifer Yearley ◽  
Terri McClanahan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document