scholarly journals Dose escalation of intravenous irinotecan using oral cefpodoxime: A phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. McGregor ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
Kristine R. Crews ◽  
Michael Tagen ◽  
Amy Wozniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Pediatric Patients

Low-dose metronomic topotecan and pazopanib in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: A C17 Canadian phase I trial (TOPAZ).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10020-10020
Author(s):  
Arif Manji ◽  
Daniel A. Morgenstern ◽  
Yvan Samson ◽  
Rebecca Deyell ◽  
Donna Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Relapsed Disease

10020 Background: Low-dose metronomic topotecan (mTP) represents a novel approach to chemotherapy delivery which, in preclinical models, may work synergistically with pazopanib (PZ) in targeting angiogenesis. This study was designed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mTP/PZ in pediatric patients with solid tumors, while describing the safety and toxicity of this regimen. Methods: A phase I dose-escalation, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of mTP/PZ was conducted at ten sites across Canada, enrolling pediatric patients aged 2-21 years with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Patients were treated with oral mTP and PZ suspension daily without interruption in 28-day cycles, with dose escalation in accordance with the rolling-six design. Five dose levels (0.12/125, 0.16/125, 0.22/125, 0.22/160, and 0.3/160 mg/m2/day of mTP/PZ) were evaluated. PK studies were performed on day 1 and at steady state, and PD studies included circulating angiogenic factors VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGF, endoglin and placental growth factor. Results: Thirty patients (pts) were enrolled, of whom 26 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with median age 12 years (3-20). The most common diagnoses included osteosarcoma (8), neuroblastoma (NB, 7), Ewing sarcoma/PNET (4), and rhabdomyosarcoma (4). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) related to protocol therapy were neutropenia (18%), thrombocytopenia (11%), lymphocytopenia (11%), AST elevation (11%), and lipase elevation (11%). Only 2 cycle-1 DLTs were observed on study, both at the 0.3/160 mg/m2 mTP/PZ dose level (2/5 pts) comprising persistent grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 ALT elevation. No AEs experienced beyond cycle-1 required treatment discontinuation. Best response was stable disease in 10/25 pts (40%) for a median duration of 6.4 months (1.7-45.1). One patient with refractory NB achieved stable disease for 45 months and continued on mTP/PZ via compassionate access after study closure. PK and PD results are pending at this time. Conclusions: The combination of oral mTP and PZ is safe and tolerable in pediatric patients with solid tumors, with a RP2D of mTP 0.22 mg/m2/day and PZ suspension 160 mg/m2/day. Ten patients achieved stable disease for a median of 6 months. The lack of objective responses suggests that this combination is likely of limited benefit for relapsed disease, but may play a role as maintenance therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02303028.

Phase I study of bortezomib and oxaliplatin (BOX) in solid tumors: Improved neurotoxicity (NT) profile with lower bortezomib (B) dose

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12007-12007
Author(s):  
R. A. Kosloff ◽  
J. Wright ◽  
P. Ivy ◽  
J. Escalon ◽  
B. Norwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Platinum Agents

12007 Background: B inhibits proteasome function and may be synergistic in causing apoptotic death with platinum agents. We were interested in combining B with OX but concerned with dose limiting (DL) NT based on our prior B phase I study [Hamilton et al., JCO 2005]: therefore this Phase I dose-escalation study (alternating increases of B and OX) focusing on NT was planned. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic solid tumors, PS 0–2, platinum or taxane naive, no peripheral neuropathy and adequate organ function, received B (D1, 4, 15, 18) and OX (D1, 15) every 28 days in a dose escalation design (see table ). Baseline and monthly assessments were performed by an independent neurologist. Results: 27 (18 gastrointestinal, 3 melanoma, 3 ovarian, 3 others) were accrued; pt characteristics: 14 male/13 female; median age 55 years (range 35–75); 2 median cycles (range 1–10). NT was not DL because it did not occur within the first cycle. Late and limiting NT was observed in levels 2–5 after 2–9 cycles, but serial neurologic evaluations showed reversible NT. With an amended new dose level to lower B to 1.0 mg/m2 (level 6) to avoid late NT, NT was not observed. Of 22 evaluable pts, there were 3 partial responses (ampullary, GE junction, biliary), 6 stable disease, and 13 disease progression by RECIST criteria. Conclusions: biweekly BOX is tolerable at B 1.0 mg/m2 and OX 85 mg/m2 with no DL NT. Additional observations on late NT are ongoing. This suggests B is a major contributor to NT observed in dose levels 2–5 and may potentiate the effects of OX. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Daily administration of MGCD265 to patients with solid tumors in a dose-escalation phase I study (study 265-101).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3106-3106
Author(s):  
M. A. Drouin ◽  
C. K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
H. E. Uronis ◽  
R. E. Martell ◽  
J. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Daily Administration

A first-in-human phase I study of CZ48, a lactone ring protected oral camptothecin, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2578-2578
Author(s):  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
Montaser F. Shaheen ◽  
John Sarantopoulos ◽  
Steven Weitman ◽  
Beppino C. Giovanella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

2578 Background: CZ48, the 20-O-propionate ester of camptothecin (CPT), is a prodrug of CPT first described by Cao et al. in 1998. The side-chain is enzymatically cleaved in tissues. This gives rise to CPT, a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Methods: An open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CZ48 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Initial dosing started qd po 80mg/m2, advancing to 2560mg/m2 for 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. Dosing was restarted in cohorts of 3 patients tid po at 18mg/m2 and escalated to 1g/m2on a 5 days on, 2 days off schedule for 28 days. Patients were prescreened by measuring CPT levels in plasma following a single pilot dose of CZ48. Dose was doubled until occurrence of at least Grade 2 adverse event, at which time 3+3 patient cohorts with a dose escalation of 33%-100% were implemented. DLT in 2/6 patients defined the MTD as the preceding DLT dose. PK parameters were measured prior to dosing, days 1-5, and day 28 of Cycle 1. Results: Poor absorption led to initial qd dosing reaching 2560mg/m2 with no signs of DLT. Subsequent tid dosing showed improved plasma levels and arrival at DLT. 34 patients were treated across 8 dose levels from 18 to 1000 mg/m2. The most frequent study-related adverse effects were cystitis, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue. Grade IV toxicities observed were febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Preliminary PK data in the qd dosing showed poor correlation between dose and Cmax or AUC, while PK in tid patients showed slightly improved correlation between dose and both CZ48 AUC (Pearson's correlation coefficient ϱ=0.476, p<0.01) and CZ48 Cmax(ϱ =0.51, p<0.01). Evidence of clinical activity with stable disease ≥ 6 months was observed in 2 heavily pre-treated colon and one breast cancer patient. Conclusions: The MTD of tid po CZ48 administered 5 days on, 2 days off of 28-day cycle is between 750 mg/m2 and 576 mg/m2. Overall toxicity is relatively mild, with DLT being cystitis and myelosuppression. Even with tid dosing, PK values correlate poorly to dose. A new formulation with 3-5 fold higher preclinical absorption values is being considered for introduction into the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT00947739.

A phase I study of panobinostat in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors, including CNS tumors.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10061-10061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul James Wood ◽  
Robyn Strong ◽  
Grant A. McArthur ◽  
Michael Michael ◽  
Elizabeth Algar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Cns Tumors

Cefixime Allows Greater Dose Escalation of Oral Irinotecan: A Phase I Study in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne L. Furman ◽  
Kristine R. Crews ◽  
Catherine Billups ◽  
Jianrong Wu ◽  
Amar J. Gajjar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Severe Diarrhea ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PurposeIrinotecan is active against a variety of malignancies; however, severe diarrhea limits its usefulness. In our phase I study, the intravenous formulation of irinotecan was administered orally daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (repeated every 21 days) to children with refractory solid tumors. Our objectives were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of oral irinotecan and to evaluate whether coadministration of cefixime (8 mg/kg/d beginning 5 days before irinotecan and continuing throughout the course) ameliorates irinotecan-induced diarrhea.Patients and MethodsIn separate cohorts, irinotecan doses were escalated from 15 to 45 mg/m2/d without cefixime and then from 45 to 60 and 75 mg/m2/d with cefixime.ResultsWithout cefixime, diarrhea was dose limiting at irinotecan 45 mg/m2/d. Myelotoxicity was not significant at any dose. The MTD was 40 mg/m2/d without cefixime but 60 mg/m2/d with cefixime. Systemic exposure to SN-38 at the MTD was significantly higher with cefixime than without cefixime (mean SN-38 area under the curve: 19.5 ng×h/mL; standard deviation [SD], 6.8 ng × h/mL v 10.4 ng × h/mL; SD, 4.3 ng × h/mL, respectively; P = .030).ConclusionCefixime administered with oral irinotecan is well tolerated in children and allows greater dose escalation of irinotecan. Because diarrhea is a major adverse effect of both intravenous and oral irinotecan, further evaluation of the use of cefixime to ameliorate this adverse effect is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document