scholarly journals Identification of Very Low‐Risk Subgroups of Patients with Primary Mediastinal Large B‐Cell Lymphoma Treated with R‐CHOP

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos ◽  
Michail Michail ◽  
Sotirios Papageorgiou ◽  
Georgia Kourti ◽  
Maria K. Angelopoulou ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3258-3258
Author(s):  
Inigo Espinosa ◽  
Javier Briones ◽  
Ramon Bordes ◽  
Salut Brunet ◽  
Rodrigo Martino ◽  
...  

Abstract The protein kinase C (PKC) superfamily includes conventional PKCs (alfa, beta 1, beta 2, and gamma) and PKC-mu. PKC plays an important role in the activation and survival of B cells. Recent studies using cDNA microarrays found that PKC-beta was overexpressed in refractary diffused large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The purpose of this study is to analyze the clinical significance of PKC-beta 2 protein expression in a homogeneous series of patients with DLBCL. Seventy-six patients with primary DLBCL consecutively diagnosed between 1991 and 2002 were studied. The median age of patients was 58 years (range, 11–18 years), 30 women and 46 men. Advanced stage (III/IV) was observed in 36 cases (47%). Of 71 patients with available date, 36 (50%) presented with high serum lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. The distribution according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) (n = 71) was as follows: low risk, 32 cases (43%); low/intermediate risk, 17 cases (23%); high/intermediate risk, 8 cases (11%); and high risk, 14 cases (19%). All patients received an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from 76 DLBCL tumors were immunostained with a monoclonal antibody against PKC-beta 2 protein. Tumors were considered positive for PKC-beta 2 if 5% o more of the tumor cells expressed the protein. The main clinical features (B symptoms, Ann Arbor stage, bulky disease, bone marrow disease, high LDH, IPI, and ECOG) of patients within the PKC-positive group were similar to those within the PKC-negative group. Twenty-six cases (34%) were positive for PKC-beta 2 protein. Within the patients whose tumors were PKC-positive, only 8 of 26 (31%) had a complete clinical remission, while that was achieved in the majority (31 of 50; 62%) of the PKC-negative patients (p = 0.015). Patients with PKC-positive tumors had a lower five-year disease free survival (DFS) (30% vs. 60%; p = 0.03) than the PKC-beta 2 negative group. Moreover, patients with low IPI whose tumors expressed PKC-beta 2 protein had an inferior five-year DFS (39% vs. 80%; p = 0.0046). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent adverse prognostic value of PKC expression (OR = 3.7 [95%CI, 1.4–9.9]; p = 0.007) in patients with DLBCL and low IPI. These results indicate that PKC-beta 2 expression on DLBCL predicts for a low response rate to chemotherapy and unfavorable clinical outcome, specially in those patients with low IPI.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19068-e19068
Author(s):  
Branimir Spassov ◽  
Donka Vassileva ◽  
Svetoslav Nikolov ◽  
Georgi Mihaylov ◽  
Georgi Balatzenko ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rika Kihara ◽  
Tomoyuki Watanabe ◽  
Takahiro Yano ◽  
Naokuni Uike ◽  
Seiichi Okamura ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2733-2733
Author(s):  
Pengpeng Xu ◽  
Huijuan Zhong ◽  
Weili Zhao

Abstract Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphomas with a relapse/refractory rate of 30-40% under the current standard Rituximab plus cyclophophamide, adrimycin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP21) treatment. As mechanism of action, Rituximab can target the B-cell receptor (BCR) and NF-ĸB signaling pathways, of which activating gene mutations are most frequently identified in activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype of DLBCL and associated with increased disease relapse of the patients. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of additional two cycles of Rituximab maintenance (RM) in DLBCL and its relation with mutational status involved in BCR/NF-ĸB cascade. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 534 de novo DLBCL patients after 6 cycles of R-CHOP21 regimen in our institution from December 1998 to December 2012. Among 413 patients achieved complete response (CR), 211 patients received additional 2 cycles of RM in a intent-to-treat manner and 202 patients underwent observation (OBS). The remaining 121 patients were primarly refractory to R-CHOP regimen. All the patients were classified according to IPI and NCCN-IPI as previously described. Immunohistochemistry for germinal center B-cell (GCB) or non-GCB subgroups were determined by Hans classification. The mutational status of BCR/NF-ĸB-associated genes (mainly as CD79A, CD79B, MYD88, and CARD11) were detected in tumor samples of 124 patients (48 cases, 43 cases and 33 cases in the RM, OBS and Refractory group, respectively). Results: No significant difference of clincial and biological characteristics were found between the RM and OBS group, including age, gender, Ann Arbor stage, ECOG score, number of extranodal involvements, serum lactic dehydrogenase level, B symptoms, IPI and NCCN-IPI risk group, and GCB/non-GCB ratio. With a median follow-up of 36.5 months, the 3-year progrssion free survival (PFS) was 79.9% and 73.6% (P=0.123), and the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 91.0% and 87.4% (P=0.149) in RM and OBS group, respectively. According to NCCN-IPI, remarkable improvement of 3-year PFS and OS was observed in low-risk patients of the RM group (100% and 100%), comparing with those of the OBS group (82.5% and 88.2%, P=0.003 and 0.027 respectively, Figure 1). Similarly, male patients with low-risk IPI could also benefit from additional 2 cycles of Rituximab with a 3-year PFS of 100% in RM vs 84.4% in OBS (P=0.006). Overall, BCR/NF-ĸB mutations were detected in 46/124 patients (37.1%), including 20/48 (41.7%), 13/43(30.2%) and 13/33 (39.4%) patients in RM, OBS and Refractory group, respectively. However, MYD88 mutations were more frequently observed in the Refractory group than in the RM/OBS group (18/33 vs 6/91, P<0.001, Table 1). Mutations are not prognostic indicators for PFS or OS in general, but interestingly, those mutation-bearing patients showed a tendency of improved disease prognosis in the RM group compared with that of the OBS group (3-year PFS 85.5% vs 70.0%, P=0.091, 3-year OS 94.7% vs 71.6%, P=0.059, Figure 2). Conclusion: Low-risk NCCI-IPI patients with DLBCL responded to R-CHOP regimen benefit from additional two cycles of RM. As a potential target of Rituximab, BCR/NF-ĸB-associated mutations reflected disease resistance to Rituximab. Whether prolonged administration of Rituximab could improve the prognosis of the patients with these mutations warrants further investigation. Table 1. The distribution of BCR/NF-κB-associated mutations in patients with DLBCL Mutated gene Refractory (N=33) CR (N=91) Additional 2R (N=48) Observation (N=43) P value CD79a 1 (3.0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0.595a CD79b 5 (15.1%) 10 (20.8%) 6 (13.9%) 0.750 a MYD88 18 (54.5%) 3 (6.0%) 3 (6.9%) <0.001b CARD11 1 (3.0%) 7 (14.0%) 4 (9.3%) 0.244a a: No significantly difference was found between Refractory group and CR group. b: Significantly difference was found between Refractory group and CR group (p<0.05). Figure 1. Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) curves of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients according to low-risk NCCN-IPI. Figure 1. Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) curves of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients according to low-risk NCCN-IPI. Figure 2. Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) curves of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with BCR/NF-ĸB-associated mutations. Figure 2. Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) curves of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with BCR/NF-ĸB-associated mutations. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1032-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Ketterer ◽  
B. Coiffier ◽  
C. Thieblemont ◽  
C. Fermé ◽  
J. Brière ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Møller ◽  
Niels T. Pedersen ◽  
Bjarne E. Christensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document