scholarly journals Objective physical activity and weight loss in adults: The step-up randomized clinical trial

Obesity ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 2284-2292 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Jakicic ◽  
Deborah F. Tate ◽  
Wei Lang ◽  
Kelliann K. Davis ◽  
Kristen Polzien ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
EIICHI YOSHIMURA ◽  
Eri Tajiri ◽  
Ryota Michiwaki ◽  
Naoyuki Matsumoto ◽  
Yoichi Hatamoto ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Some studies on weight loss promotion using smartphone applications (smartphone app) including mobile applications have shown a weight loss effect, but not an increase in physical activity, and they have not been rigorously examined for longer periods. OBJECTIVE To assess whether the use of a smartphone app will increase physical activity and reduce body weight. METHODS In this parallel randomized clinical trial, participants recruited between April 2018 and June 2019 were randomized in equal proportions to a smartphone app group (n=55) or control group (n=54). The intention-to-treat approach was used to analyze the data from December 2019 through November 2021. Before the intervention, an hour-long lecture on weight loss instruction and increasing physical activity was conducted once for both groups. Participants in both groups were instructed to weigh themselves immediately after waking up at least once daily from the start of the intervention. Monthly e-mails were sent advising the participants on how to lose weight and increase physical activity in order to maintain or increase motivation in both groups. Participants in the smartphone app group were instructed to launch the app at least once a day to check their step count and rank. The primary outcome was daily accelerometer-measured physical activity (step count) and secondary outcomes was body weight. RESULTS The 109 participants had a mean (standard deviation) age of 47 (8) years. At baseline, the mean (standard deviation) daily total steps were 7259 (3256) for the smartphone app and 8243 (2815) for control groups, respectively. After the 32-week intervention period, the step count per wear time was significantly higher in the smartphone app group than in the control group [average difference (95%CI): 65 (30 to 101) vs. -9 (-56 to 39), p=0.042]. The weight loss was -2.2 kg (-3.1%) in the smartphone app group and -2.2 kg (-3.1%) in the control group, with no significant difference between the groups. During the intervention period, the step count per wear time on Saturdays [615 (545 to 684) vs. 554 (483 to 624), p=0.006] and Sundays [623 (553 to 694) vs. 556 (485 to 627), p=0.004] was significantly higher in the smartphone app group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS In this trial, the smartphone app group showed increased physical activity, especially on weekends. However, this increased physical activity did not lead to weight loss. CLINICALTRIAL UMIN000033397 https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&action=brows&recptno=R000037956&type=summary&language=J


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-471
Author(s):  
Lingli Cai ◽  
Jun Yin ◽  
Xiaojing Ma ◽  
Yifei Mo ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maj Siercke ◽  
Sanne Pagh Moller ◽  
Lau Caspar Thygesen ◽  
Henrik Sillesen ◽  
Dorthe Overgaard

Aim: This study aimed to explore how qualitative data about rehabilitation for patients with intermittent claudication do provide an enhanced understanding of the quantitative experimental results. Background: The study was a randomized clinical trial comparing a rehabilitation intervention with usual care. A statistically significant difference between rehabilitation and usual care was found in walking distance, physical activity, quality of life and diet. The findings from the quantitative and qualitative analyses were analysed separately on their own tradition. In this study, mixed methods address whether the qualitative results could help explain the quantitative results and bring forward additional information. Design: Complex mixed-method intervention design with a convergent questionnaire variant. Methods: From April 2017- May 2019, patients diagnosed with intermittent claudication were included in a randomized clinical trial (N=118). In addition, qualitative interview informants from the intervention group were sampled from the quantitative study population for a survey (N=43) and focus group interviews (N=10). Interviews were conducted from April 2018-August 2019. Results: Integrated analyses identified how improvement in walking distance, physical activity, diet and quality of life was affected by team spirit, pedometer, education and fun exercise in a local setting. Quantitative and qualitative findings primarily confirmed and expanded each other; however, two discordant results were also evident. Conclusion: Our study adds empirical evidence regarding how a mixed-methods study can be used to obtain a more nuanced understanding of complex healthcare problems. The study provides new knowledge concerning how to set up a rehabilitation programme for patients with intermittent claudication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document