Investigating online recognition for blood donor retention: an experiential donor value approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Chell ◽  
Gary Mortimer
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-75
Author(s):  
Swati Sharma ◽  
Gita Negi ◽  
Rashi A Gulati ◽  
Rekha Bhandari ◽  
Vibha Gupta ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delroy L. Paulhus ◽  
David R. Shaffer ◽  
Leslie L. Downing

Author(s):  
Dr. Rahul Rajvanshi ◽  
Dr. Farzana Kothari ◽  
Dr. Milind Dighe ◽  
Dr. Jhalak Patel

Background: Voluntary donors normally tolerate blood donation very well, but, occasionally, adverse reactions of variable severity may occur during or at the end of the collection. The occurrence of adverse reactions to blood donation significantly hampers donor retention and negatively impacts on the universal availability of adequate numbers of blood donor units.  Objective: To analyze the spectrum and prevalence of adverse reactions in blood donors in a tertiary care hospital-based blood bank in SSG Hospital, Vadodara.  Materials and Methods: The details of blood donors who presented for donation from January 2107 to April 2019 period were retrieved from the departmental archives for analysis. These included type of donor, type and frequency of adverse reactions to blood donation. Results: The prevalence of adverse reactions to blood donation was (315/35027) 0.9%; this occurred more frequently in first time donors compared to repeat blood donors. Presyncopal reactions were the most frequent adverse reaction encountered among the donors 52.38% (165/315). Conclusion: Presyncopal reactions are common adverse reactions in our blood donor set; this has implications on transfusion safety and blood donor retention. Keywords: Presyncopal reactions, adverse donor reactions, blood donor


Transfusion ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 1778-1786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadian S. Sinclair ◽  
Tavis S. Campbell ◽  
Patricia M. Carey ◽  
Eric Langevin ◽  
Brent Bowser ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2296
Author(s):  
Anna Lange-Consiglio ◽  
Rosangela Garlappi ◽  
Chiara Spelta ◽  
Antonella Idda ◽  
Stefano Comazzi ◽  
...  

Platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of bovine mastitis, with an action comparable to that of antibiotics. Autologous treatment is feasible in experimental conditions but is difficult to apply in field conditions, particularly in acute mastitis. The ideal scenario would be to have heterologous PRP stored on every farm so that it is readily available when needed. In this paper, we analysed data collected during bovine mastitis treatment with heterologous PRP produced by casual donor cows on several farms. We tried to identify parameters which might be useful to identify the most suitable cows to be used as blood donors, to obtain the highest yield of PRP. Variables considered for each animal were the age, the parity, the date of the last parturition, the season of blood collection, the site of blood collection (jugular or mammary vein) and the reproductive status e.g., pregnant or not pregnant. There were statistically significant differences for all the variables considered from the 135 blood cows, except for the blood collection season. The highest yield of PRP was associated with nonpregnancy blood collection within three months of parturition, parity 3 or 4, and blood collection from the mammary vein.


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 102495
Author(s):  
Tjeerd W. Piersma ◽  
René Bekkers ◽  
Wim de Kort ◽  
Eva-Maria Merz
Keyword(s):  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Anja Dörschug ◽  
Julian Schwanbeck ◽  
Andreas Hahn ◽  
Anke Hillebrecht ◽  
Sabine Blaschke ◽  
...  

Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic identification of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Depending on the assessed immunoglobulin subclass, recorded sensitivity ranged from 17.0% to 81.9% with best results for immunoglobulin G. Specificity with blood donor sera ranged from 90.2% to 100%, with sera from EBV patients it ranged from 84.3% to 100%. Agreement from fair to nearly perfect was recorded depending on the immunoglobulin class between the assays, the with best results being found for immunoglobulin G. Only for this immunoglobulin class was the association between later sample acquisition times (about three weeks after first positive PCR results) and positive serological results in COVID-19 patients confirmed. In conclusion, acceptable and comparable reliability for the assessed immunoglobulin G-specific assays could be shown, while there is still room for improvement regarding the reliability of the assays targeting the other immunoglobulin classes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document