Association between emergency department length of stay and patient outcomes: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Burgess ◽  
Gillian Ray‐Barruel ◽  
Kathryn Kynoch
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Outcomes

scholarly journals Interventions to reduce emergency department consultation time: A systematic review of the literature

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-64
Author(s):  
Weiwei Beckerleg ◽  
Krista Wooller ◽  
Delvina Hasimjia
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Decision Time ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Consultation Process ◽  
Admission Process ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTObjectivesOvercrowding in the emergency department (ED) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Studies have shown that consultation to decision time, defined as the time when a consultation has been accepted by a specialty service to the time when disposition decision is made, is one important contributor to the overall length of stay in the ED.The primary objective of this review is to evaluate the impact of workflow interventions on consultation to decision time and ED length of stay in patients referred to consultant services in teaching centres, and to identify barriers to reducing consultation to decision time.MethodsThis systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted to identify relevant studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL databases. Study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were carried out by two independent reviewers.ResultsA total of nine full text articles were included in the review. All studies reported a decrease in consultation to decision time post intervention, and two studies reported cost savings. Interventions studied included short messaging service (SMS) messaging, education with audit and feedback, standardization of the admission process, implementation of institutional guideline, modification of the consultation process, and staffing schedules. Overall study quality was fair to poor.ConclusionsThe limited evidence suggests that audit and feedback in the form of SMS messaging, direct consultation to senior physicians, and standardization of the admission process may be the most effective and feasible interventions. Additional high-quality studies are required to explore sustainable interventions aimed at reducing consultation to decision time.

scholarly journals MP05: Diagnostic accuracy of point of care ultrasound in undifferentiated hypotension presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S43-S44 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Richardson ◽  
O. Loubani ◽  
P. Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Full Article ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Strong Conclusion

Introduction: Undifferentiated hypotension remains one of the most life-threatening presentations to emergency departments (ED) around the world. An accurate and rapid initial assessment is essential, as shock carries a high mortality with multiple unique etiologies and management plans. Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) has emerged as a promising tool to improve these diagnostic and management challenges, yet its reliability in this setting remains unclear. Methods: We performed a systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to June 8, 2018. Databases were reviewed by two independent researchers and all languages were included. The methodological quality of included studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Our primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of PoCUS in hypotension, with secondary outcomes including patient outcomes and changes to management. Results: Our literature search revealed 5345 articles after duplicates were removed, leaving 235 articles for full article review. Following full article review, 9 studies remained and were included in the systematic review. There were 2 randomized control trials, 6 prospective cohort trials, and 1 retrospective cohort trial. For our primary outcome of diagnostic accuracy, eight studies were included; we extracted Kappa values ranging from 0.70 to 0.971, pooled sensitivity ranging from 69% to 88%, and pooled specificity ranging from 88% to 96%. Four studies reported on management change including results reporting shorter time to disposition, change in diagnostic test ordering (18% to 31%), change in consultation (13.6%), change in admission location (12%) and change in management plan (25% to 40%). Only one study reported on patient outcomes, which revealed no survival or length of stay benefit. Conclusion: When assessing for the diagnostic accuracy of PoCUS in the setting of undifferentiated hypotension presenting to the emergency department, we found fair consistency between PoCUS and final diagnosis with high Kappa values, fair to good pooled sensitivities, and good to excellent specificities. There was no strong evidence indicating improved outcomes. However, the large amount of heterogeneity amongst studies has limited our ability to make a strong conclusion except that future research should focus on a uniform study design and patient focused outcomes.

scholarly journals Impact of AKI care bundles on kidney and patient outcomes in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah A. I. Schaubroeck ◽  
Diana Vargas ◽  
Wim Vandenberghe ◽  
Eric A. J. Hoste
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Care Bundles ◽  
Bundle Compliance

Abstract Background A bundle of preventive measures can be taken to avoid acute kidney injury (AKI) or progression of AKI. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the compliance to AKI care bundles in hospitalized patients and its impact on kidney and patient outcomes. Methods Randomized controlled trials, observational and interventional studies were included. Studied outcomes were care bundle compliance, occurrence of AKI and moderate-severe AKI, use of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), kidney recovery, mortality (ICU, in-hospital and 30-day) and length-of-stay (ICU, hospital). The search engines PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were used (January 1, 2012 - June 30, 2021). Meta-analysis was performed with the Mantel Haenszel test (risk ratio) and inverse variance (mean difference). Bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RCT) and the NIH study quality tool (non-RCT). Results We included 23 papers of which 13 were used for quantitative analysis (4 RCT and 9 non-randomized studies with 25,776 patients and 30,276 AKI episodes). Six were performed in ICU setting. The number of trials pooled per outcome was low. There was a high variability in care bundle compliance (8 to 100%). Moderate-severe AKI was less frequent after bundle implementation [RR 0.78, 95%CI 0.62–0.97]. AKI occurrence and KRT use did not differ between the groups [resp RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.76–1.05; RR 0.67, 95%CI 0.38–1.19]. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was lower in AKI patients exposed to a care bundle [resp RR 0.81, 95%CI 0.73–0.90, RR 0.95 95%CI 0.90–0.99]; this could not be confirmed by randomized trials. Hospital length-of-stay was similar in both groups [MD -0.65, 95%CI -1.40,0.09]. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that implementation of AKI care bundles in hospitalized patients reduces moderate-severe AKI. This result is mainly driven by studies performed in ICU setting. Lack of data and heterogeneity in study design impede drawing firm conclusions about patient outcomes. Moreover, compliance to AKI care bundles in hospitalized patients is highly variable. Additional research in targeted patient groups at risk for moderate-severe AKI with correct and complete implementation of a feasible, well-tailored AKI care bundle is warranted. (CRD42020207523).

scholarly journals Has the implementation of time-based-targets for emergency department length-of-stay influenced the quality of care for patients? A systematic review of qualitative literature

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Walker ◽  
Bridget Honan ◽  
Daniel Haustead ◽  
David Mountain ◽  
Vinay Gangathimmaiah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Qualitative Literature

abstractBackgroundTime-based-targets for emergency department length-of-stay were introduced in England in 2000; followed by Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and Australia after emergency department crowding was associated with poor quality of care and increased mortality.ObjectivesThe aim of the systematic review was to evaluate qualitative literature to investigate how implementing time-based-targets for emergency department length-of-stay has influenced the quality of care of patients.MethodsSystematic review of qualitative studies that described knowledge, attitudes to or experiences regarding a time-based-target for emergency department length-of-stay. Searches were conducted in Cochrane library, Medline, Embase, CInAHL, Emerald, ABI/Inform, and Informit. Individual studies were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Individual study findings underwent thematic analysis. Confidence in findings was assessed using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach.ResultsThe review included thirteen studies from four countries, incorporating 617 interviews. Themes identified were: quality of care, access block and overcrowding, patient experience, staff morale and workload, intrahospital and interdepartmental relationships, clinical education and training, gaming, and enablers and barriers to achieving targets. The confidence in findings is moderate or high for most themes. More patient and junior doctor perspectives are needed.ConclusionsEmergency time-based-targets have impacted on the quality of emergency patient care. The impact can be both positive and negative and successful implementation depends on whole hospital resourcing and engagement with targets.FundingThe Australasian College for Emergency Medicine provided administrative support for the study, no funding was received.RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42019107755 (prospective)

Emergency Department Length of Stay and Other Factors Contributing to Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patient Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolle W. Davis ◽  
Tiffany O. Sheehan ◽  
Brian C. Peach ◽  
Margaret Ansell ◽  
Jeannie P. Cimiotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Patient Outcomes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document