scholarly journals Does the mutual recognition agreement on nursing services accelerate nurse migration in member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations?

Nursing Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1187-1196
Author(s):  
Sudo Kyoko ◽  
Kazuko Naruse ◽  
Boonyanurak Puangrat
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Southeast Asian ◽  
Nurse Migration ◽  
Nursing Services ◽  
Mutual Recognition Agreement

Study on Supervision Mode of Floating Nuclear Power Plant With Small Modular Reactor

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wan ◽  
Guiyong Li ◽  
Min Rui ◽  
Yongkang Liu ◽  
Jue Yang
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Nuclear Safety ◽  
Small Modular Reactor ◽  
License Application ◽  
Mutual Recognition Agreement ◽  
Nuclear Installation

A floating nuclear power plant (FNPP) with small modular reactor (SMR) is a combination of a civilian nuclear infrastructure and an offshore installation, which is defined as a floating nuclear facility. The article draws the lessons from studying of the engineer combination like Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) under the regulation of several government departments. It puts forward recommendations for license application and government regulation as follows in consideration with current license application for nuclear power plant and ship survey. A FNPP shall follow the requirements of construction, fueling and operation for civil nuclear installation combined with ship survey. Application is submitted to nuclear safety regulator for construction permit, while the design drawings shall be submitted to department of ship survey which checks the drawings whether meet the requirements of ship survey, considering some nuclear safety needs. The result of ship survey shall be represented in the safety analysis reports. The construction and important devices manufacturing shall be under the supervision of nuclear installation regulators and ship survey departments. In conclusion, National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) and Maritime Safety Administration of the People’s Republic of China (MSA) shall establish united supervisory system for SMR on sea in China. It is suggested that NNSA is in charge of the overall safety of a FNPP, while MSA is responsible of the ship survey. The operator shall undertake obligation of a FNPP and evaluate the ship cooperating with experienced agency. It is suggested that government departments build the mutual recognition agreement of safety review. It is better to solve the vague questions by coordination.

scholarly journals AKUNTAN DAN ERA KETERBUKAAN ARUS LALU LINTAS JASA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Vidia Gati
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Skilled Labour ◽  
Mutual Recognition Agreement

Profesi akuntan adalah salah satu profesi yang mendapatkan sertifikasi dari negara negara ASEAN berdasarkan Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA sehingga nantinya akan memudahkan lintas profesi diantara Negara tersebut. Adanya gap antara jumlah akuntan yang tersedia dan yang dibutuhkan akan menimbulkan persoalan yaitu serbuan tenaga kerja asing di masa arus lalu lintas jasa benar benar terbuka. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia sudah melakukan berbagai aktifitas untuk mempersiapkan masa tersebut, namun hendaknya perhitungan realistis perlu dikedepankan mengingat struktur sumber daya manusia di Indonesia didominasi oleh low skilled labour sehingga opsi menunda pemberlakuannya mungkin dapat diperhitungkan untuk memberi kesempatan anak bangsa mencapai posisi strategis daripada posisi sebagai buruh di negeri sendiri.

Regional Cooperation in Southeast Asian Higher Education

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Hirosato
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Regional Cooperation ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Student Mobility ◽  
Southeast Asian ◽  
Credit Transfer ◽  
Intergovernmental Cooperation ◽  
Interregional Cooperation

The launch of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Community in December 2015 is expected to accelerate structural transformation in Southeast Asia. It is also an initiative that shifts the landscape of higher education in Southeast Asia, which needs to meet the challenges posed by the process of regionalization of higher education. Based on the review of theoretical and conceptual works on regionalization in higher education, a broader scope of regional cooperation in higher education in Southeast Asia is suggested. Such broader scope is enable to survey the main actors (stakeholders) engaged in regional cooperation in higher education in Southeast Asia at multiple levels of cooperation: universities/higher education institutions (HEIs); government/intergovernmental cooperation; and intra-/interregional cooperation. Furthermore, two priority areas for harmonization in higher education, namely, quality assurance (QA) and credit transfer, are highlighted as particular forms of regional cooperation. Both internal and external QA systems are explained. In particular, the Academic Credit Transfer Framework for Asia (ACTFA) is introduced, which would serve as a main framework for credit transfer for Southeast Asia, by embracing credit transfer system/scheme which exist in Southeast Asia. In lieu of conclusion, main actors (stakeholders) including their mechanisms to engage in regional cooperation in higher education are summarized according to functions such as capacity building, credit transfer, grading, student mobility, mutual recognition, qualification framework, and quality assurance. Future directions in regional cooperation are suggested to pave the way towards the creation of a “common space” in higher education in Southeast Asia, or eventually the Southeast Asian Higher Education Area (SEAHEA), by developing and adapting common rules, standards, guidelines, and frameworks to be applicable to Southeast Asia.

The Study on Selecting Qualification Items and Preparing Strategies for Mutual Recognition Agreement

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-131
Author(s):  
Myung-Hun Lee ◽  
◽  
Soon-Hae Kang ◽  
Seung-Il Na ◽  
Su-Bong Uh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Mutual Recognition Agreement

scholarly journals International Athletic Training and Therapy: Comparing Partners in the Mutual Recognition Agreement

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-254
Author(s):  
Eva M. Frank ◽  
Siobhán O'Connor ◽  
Glen Bergeron ◽  
Greg Gardner
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
The United States ◽  
Academic Education ◽  
Certification Exams ◽  
Mutual Recognition Agreement ◽  
Mutual Recognition Arrangement ◽  
Therapy Education

Context The globalization of athletic training and therapy is advancing and professionals have more opportunities to transition to international working environments. Objective To compare the American, Canadian, and Irish athletic training and therapy education, accreditation, and certification processes. Background The Mutual Recognition Arrangement recognized the equivalency of athletic training and therapy in the United States, Canada, and Ireland, and thereby provides an avenue for nationally credentialed professionals to obtain equivalent credentials in one of the aforementioned countries. Synthesis As a comparison, this article demonstrated that there was a commonality among countries, but also highlighted the unique jurisdictional differences that our members should be aware of should they want to transition to partner countries. Results We performed a comparative analysis of the education, accreditation, and certification processes among the United States, Canada, and Ireland. Specific differences were noted among supervision methods, clinical education methods, and certification exams. All of these are grounded in the Mutual Recognition Agreement. Recommendation(s) We recommend that the Mutual Recognition Agreement be held as a basis for future partnerships with other countries. Conclusion(s) This article provided an overview and highlighted the similarities among academic education, domains, and content areas covered under the Mutual Recognition Agreement among athletic training and therapy programs in the United States, Canada, and Ireland. The education programs, accreditation procedures, and certification systems, although differing in structure, were consistent in delivering content that aligns with the Mutual Recognition Agreement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document