scholarly journals NSCD discrete element method for modelling masonry structures

2005 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Chetouane ◽  
F. Dubois ◽  
M. Vinches ◽  
C. Bohatier
2020 ◽  
Vol 216 ◽  
pp. 110721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Masi ◽  
Ioannis Stefanou ◽  
Victor Maffi-Berthier ◽  
Paolo Vannucci

Author(s):  
Brahim Chetouane ◽  
Claude Bohatier ◽  
Marc Vinches

The aim of this paper is to provide answers to some questions of the archaeologists and leaders of cultural heritage agencies in charge of structures affected by structural problems and instabilities with emphasis on the Arles roman aqueduct in the South of France. The modeling is performed with NSCD discrete element method. The 3D geometric decomposition of the two structures is realistic and is obtained by a conversion from (DXF) CAO format to LMGC90 discrete element code which is dealing with the NSCD method. A comparison with continuous modeling shows the unique possibilities of discrete modeling to account for observed failure phenomena on the real structures.


TAPPI Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Daniel Varney ◽  
Douglas Bousfield

Cracking at the fold is a serious issue for many grades of coated paper and coated board. Some recent work has suggested methods to minimize this problem by using two or more coating layers of different properties. A discrete element method (DEM) has been used to model deformation events for single layer coating systems such as in-plain and out-of-plain tension, three-point bending, and a novel moving force picking simulation, but nothing has been reported related to multiple coating layers. In this paper, a DEM model has been expanded to predict the three-point bending response of a two-layer system. The main factors evaluated include the use of different binder systems in each layer and the ratio of the bottom and top layer weights. As in the past, the properties of the binder and the binder concentration are input parameters. The model can predict crack formation that is a function of these two sets of factors. In addition, the model can predict the flexural modulus, the maximum flexural stress, and the strain-at-failure. The predictions are qualitatively compared with experimental results reported in the literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document