scholarly journals Retracted: First report of Talaromyces pinophilus causing postharvest rot of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris ) in Minnesota, USA

2021 ◽  
Plant Disease ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (12) ◽  
pp. 3278-3278 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. R. Khan ◽  
M. E. Haque ◽  
R. Brueggeman ◽  
S. Zhong ◽  
M. Z. R. Bhuiyan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Rosenzweig ◽  
L.E. Hanson ◽  
D. Pratt ◽  
J. Stewart ◽  
P. Somohano

Plant Disease ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Fizal Khan ◽  
Md. Ehsanul Haque ◽  
Peter Hakk ◽  
Md. Ziaur Rahman Bhuyian ◽  
Yangxi Liu ◽  
...  

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is a globally important crop for sugar. In May 2019, sugar beet seedlings were observed with wilting, lodging and a few were dead in Glendive (46.970170, -104.838204), Montana. Symptoms appeared near the soil line as the stem (hypocotyl) turned dark brown to black with characteristic thread-like infections which resembled Pythium damping-off. It affected approximately 10% of the growing seedlings. Diseased sugar beet root tissues were excised with a sterile scalpel and small pieces (10 mm²) were surface sterilized with 70 % ethanol for 30 seconds, rinsed twice with autoclaved water, air-dried and transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA) media amended with pimaricin-vancomycin-PCNB (Conway, 1985). Four plates were incubated at 25° C in the dark (Masago et al., 1977) and two weeks later white, dense colony was observed (Zhang et al., 2018). The terminal smooth, globose oogonia (average 18.5 µm in diameter) and antheridia (average 14.5 × 9.5 µm) extended below the oogonium were observed via VWR N. A. 0.30 microscope. The morphological features of the four isolates were consistent with Pythium ultimum Trow (Watanabe, 2002). Genomic DNAs (NORGEN BIOTEK CORP, Fungi DNA Isolation Kit #26200) of four isolates were used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the ITS6-ITS7 primers (Taheri et al., 2017). Subsequently, PCR products were flushed by E.Z.N.A ®Cycle Pure Kit, OMEGA and four samples were sent for Sanger sequencing to GenScript (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ). The sequences were identical and submitted to GenBank, NCBI (accession no. MN398593). The NCBI Blast analysis showed 100% sequence homology to Pythium ultimum with the following GenBank accessions; KF181451.1, KF181449.1 and AY598657.2. Pathogenicity test was done on sugar beet with the same isolates in the greenhouse. Two week old, pythium culture was mixed with vermiculite and perlite mixer (PRO-MIX FLX) in the plastic trays (24´´ x 15´´× 3˝), (22 °C, 75% Relaive Humidity). Sterile water (500 ml/each tray) was added in the mixer to provide sufficient moisture. Twenty seeds of cv. Hilleshog 4302 were sown in the tray, and the trays were replicated thrice with inoculated and mock treatments. Plants were watered as needed to maintain adequate soil moisture conducive for plant growth and disease development. Seven days after sowing, 50% and 100% germination was observed in the inoculated and control treatments, respectively. At the beginning of the second week, 30% post-emergence damping-off was observed in the inoculated treatments. Diseased seedlings were gently pulled out from the pots where similar symptoms were observed in the sugar beet seedlings as described previously. No incidence of disease was observed in mock-treated seedlings. Consistent reisolation of Pythium ultimum was morphologically and molecularly confirmed from the diseased seedlings, thus fulfilling Koch’s postulates. Pythium spp identification is prerequisite to develop effective management of pre and post-emergence damping-off. Pythium ultimum was previously reported in Nebraska to cause sugar beet seed rot and pre-emergence damping-off (Harvenson 2006). To our knowledge, this is the first report of Pythium ultimum causing damping-off on sugar beet in the Sidney factory district in Montana.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.W. Kirk ◽  
L.E. Hanson ◽  
G.D. Franc ◽  
W.L. Stump ◽  
E. Gachango ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 1258-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. R. Khan ◽  
M. Z. R. Bhuiyan ◽  
K. Chittem ◽  
F. Shahoveisi ◽  
M. E. Haque ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 596-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Harveson

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants exhibiting dull green and chlorotic foliage were first observed in a field near Dalton, NE, in late July 1999. Root symptoms included distal tip rot with internal, yellow-brown, water-soaked tissues. Isolations on MBV medium (1) consistently yielded Aphanomyces cochlioides Drechs. Water cultures produced primary zoospores that encysted at the tips of sporangiophores, followed by release of secondary zoospores within 12 h. Seedlings inoculated with zoospores began to die 2 weeks after emergence in a greenhouse. Symptoms on hypocotyls began as water-soaked lesions that turned black and thread-like. The causal agent was reisolated from infected seedlings, completing Koch's postulates. The disease was subsequently found in more than 15 separate fields, representing 5 of 11 sugar beet-growing counties in Nebraska and 1 county in Wyoming. In October, plants from the same fields were observed with stunted, distorted roots and superficial, scabby lesions associated with latent A. cochlioides infection. The pathogen could not be isolated from this stage but was confirmed by observing mature oospores within thin, stained sections under a microscope. The sections were additionally mixed with sterile potting soil and planted in the greenhouse with sugar beets. Several weeks after emergence, seedlings began to die, and the pathogen was reisolated. This represents the first report of Aphanomyces root rot and its spread in the Central High Plains. It also confirms that the described latent symptoms on sugar beet are caused by A. cochlioides. Reference: (1). W. F. Pfender et al. Plant Dis. 68:845, 1984.


2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasu Thilagavathi ◽  
Rajendran Ramjegathesh ◽  
Lingan Rajendran ◽  
Sundarasu Sivakumar ◽  
Gandhi Karthikeyan ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (11) ◽  
pp. 2334-2334 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Arabiat ◽  
A. K. Chanda ◽  
K. Chittem ◽  
M. F. R. Khan

Plant Disease ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 580-580
Author(s):  
M. F. R. Khan ◽  
M. E. Haque ◽  
M. Bloomquist ◽  
M. Z. R. Bhuiyan ◽  
R. Brueggeman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document