A multicenter, randomized trial comparing pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment with native tissue and synthetic mesh: A 5‐year follow‐up study

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 1002-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone dos Reis B. Silveira ◽  
Antomio PF. Auge ◽  
Zsuzsanna IK. Jarmy‐Dibella ◽  
Paulo FR. Margarido ◽  
Silvia Carramao ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sissel H. Oversand ◽  
Anne Cathrine Staff ◽  
Anny E. Spydslaug ◽  
Rune Svenningsen ◽  
Ellen Borstad

2004 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 758-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunilla Tegerstedt ◽  
Margareta Hammarström

Author(s):  
Sapna Puri ◽  
Rohini Jaggi ◽  
Isha Sunil

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is common in women and 7-9% undergo surgical repair. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy is the most durable operation for vault prolapse and Nulliparous prolapse respectively. The objectives of this study were to describe Anatomic and symptomatic outcomes up to 5 years after abdominal sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy.Methods: This study was conducted in ASCOMS hospital for a cohort of patients who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) or sacrohysteropexy (ASH) in 2 years (2013-2015) and follow up done for a period of 5 years from 2015-2019. These patients were evaluated for subjective and objective outcomes following ASC and ASH. women completed questionnaires and were examined in gynaecology clinic. Prospective follow up study using standarised examination with pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and questionnairesResults: In the present study, there was low incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as long term complications were significantly low. The anatomical cure rate and patient satisfaction rate was both 100%.Conclusions: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse and sacrohysteropexy for Nulliparous prolapse is safe and effective method and is considered gold standard for treatment of Apical compartment prolapse.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone dos Reis Brandão da Silveira ◽  
Jorge Milhem Haddad ◽  
Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jármy-Di Bella ◽  
Fernanda Nastri ◽  
Miriam Goncalves Markos Kawabata ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-219
Author(s):  
Yugo Sawada ◽  
Yasuhide Kitagawa ◽  
Tokumasa Hayashi ◽  
Shino Tokiwa ◽  
Mika Nagae ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rui Wang ◽  
Krista Reagan ◽  
Sarah Boyd ◽  
Paul Tulikangas

Objective: To evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy using autologous rectus fascia to provide more data regarding non-mesh alternatives in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Design: Cohort study with retrospective and prospective data. Setting: A single academic medical center. Population: Women who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy using autologous rectus fascia between January 2010 and December 2019 Methods: Patients were recruited for a follow-up visit including completing the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) exam. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Main Outcome Measures: Composite failure, anatomic failure, symptomatic failure, and retreatment. Results: During the study period, 132 women underwent sacrocolpopexy using autologous rectus fascia. Median follow-up time was 2.2 years. Survival analysis showed that composite failure was 0.8% (CI 0.1-5.9%) at 12 months, 3.5% (CI 1.1-10.7%) at 2 years, 13.2% (CI 7.0-24.3%) at 3 years, and 28.3% (CI 17.0-44.8%) at 5 years. Anatomic failure was 0% at 12 months, 1.4% (CI 0.2-9.2%) at 2 years, 3.1% (CI 0.8-12.0%) at 3 years, and 6.8% (CI 2.0-22.0%) at 5 years. Symptomatic failure rate was 0% at 12 months, 1.3% (CI 0.2-9.0%) at 2 years, 2.9% (CI 0.7-11.3%) at 3 years, and 13.1% (CI 5.3-30.3%) at 5 years. Retreatment rate was 0.8% (CI 0.1-5.9%) at 12 months and 2 years, 9.4% (CI 4.2-20.3%) at 3 years, and 13.0% (CI 6.0-27.2%) at 5 years. Conclusions: Autologous rectus fascia sacrocolpopexy may be considered a safe and effective alternative for patients who desire to avoid synthetic mesh.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1455-1462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Jacquetin ◽  
Brigitte Fatton ◽  
Claude Rosenthal ◽  
Henri Clavé ◽  
Philippe Debodinance ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1679-1686 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Jacquetin ◽  
P. Hinoul ◽  
J. Gauld ◽  
B. Fatton ◽  
C. Rosenthal ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document