External electrical stimulation compared with intravaginal electrical stimulation for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: A randomized controlled noninferiority trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1834-1843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Dmochowski ◽  
Catherine M. Lynch ◽  
Mitchell Efros ◽  
Linda Cardozo
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Noninferiority Trial ◽  
Intravaginal Electrical Stimulation

scholarly journals The effect of intravaginal electrical stimulation on the quality of life and changes in function and anatomy of pelvic floor in women with stress urinary incontinence

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
Carneiro Erica ◽  
Araùjo Nazete ◽  
Cader Samaria ◽  
Fonseca Aluizio ◽  
Bittencourt Leila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Pelvic Floor Muscles ◽  
Detrusor Muscle ◽  
Intravaginal Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Urine Loss

Abstract Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI), according to the Committee of the International Continence Society Standards, is defined as any involuntary urine loss associated to exertion conditions. This urine loss can be called Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and when the detrusor muscle becomes inactive Material and methods: The goal of this study was verifying intravaginal electrical stimulation effects on bladder floor mobility, pelvic floor muscles´ width, their contraction ability and the quality of life of 40 women whose age ranged from 35 to 55 and who were diagnosed with Stress Urinary Incontinence disorder. They were split into two groups: Geletro (underwent 16 perineal electrical stimulation sessions) and control group, Gc (no intervention). The variables were respectively evaluated by the following instruments: transvaginal ultrassonography (Toshiba trademark), Phenix electromyographic biofeedback and King´s Health Questionnaire. Results: The results were bladder floor mobility reduction (Δ% = -9,13%, p=0,0930), width increase on pelvic floor muscles (Δ% = 11,64%, p= 0,2924), both not significant, muscle strength increase due to biofeedback (Δ% =60,49%, p= 0,0001) and to AFA* (Δ% = 24,53%, p=0,0001), and significant decrease of all questionnaire scores: DOM 1 (Δ% = -50,00%, p = 0,000), DOM 2 (Δ% = -55,14%, p= 0,005), DOM 3 (Δ% =-74,98 %, p= 0,002), DOM 4 (Δ% = -73,87%, p= 0,002), DOM 5 (Δ% = -68,91%, p= 0,001), DOM 6 (Δ% = -85,90%, p= 0,000), DOM 7 (Δ% = -72,48%, p= 0,014), DOM 8 (Δ% =-71,88 %, p= 0,030), DOM 9Δ% =-73,29 %, p= 0,023) Conclusions: The Geletro group in comparison to the Gc which showed that intravaginal electrical stimulation improved the pelvic floor anatomically and functionally and also the quality of life of Geletro group. Stress Urinary Incontinence improvement could only be subjectively demonstrated.

Randomized controlled trial comparing TVT-O and TVT-S for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year results

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1343-1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Maria H. M. Bianchi-Ferraro ◽  
Zsuzsanna I. K. Jarmy-DiBella ◽  
Rodrigo de Aquino Castro ◽  
Maria Augusta T. Bortolini ◽  
Marair G. F. Sartori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document