Urethral bulking agents for female stress urinary incontinence

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 887-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadiya M. Hussain ◽  
Rhiannon Bray
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Female Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Bulking Agents ◽  
Urethral Bulking Agents ◽  
Urethral Bulking

scholarly journals Urethral Bulking Agents in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 84-93
Author(s):  
V. F. Bezhenar ◽  
B. V. Arakelyan ◽  
V. A. Krutova ◽  
O. V. Tarabanova ◽  
A. A. Khachetsukova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Considerable Effect ◽  
Female Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Bulking Agents ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Urethral Bulking Agents ◽  
Urethral Bulking ◽  
High Level

Aim. The article presents information on modern urethral bulking agents used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).Materials and methods. The authors reviewed the current scientifi c literature on the topic (original articles, monographs, meta-analyses), whose relevance lies in the increasing interest of both clinicians and patients in the minimally invasive treatment of SUI.Results. On the basis of available information on the use of urethral bulking agents, regulatory bodies prohibited the use of substances that did not meet the requirements of safety and effi cacy. Substances approved for clinical use are safe and show considerable effect, which makes them a suitable alternative to the surgical treatment of SUI.Conclusions. This kind of treatment is characterised by a low rate of serious complications and a suffi ciently high level of patients’ satisfaction with the results, despite its lower objective cure rate. Further research in this area involves a search for the “ideal” urethral bulking agent, as well as the use of cell technologies.

Stress Urinary Incontinence I: Nonsurgical Management

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svjetlana Lozo ◽  
Sylvia M Botros
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pharmacologic Therapy ◽  
Bulking Agents ◽  
Urethral Bulking Agents ◽  
Nonsurgical Management ◽  
Urethral Bulking

Conservative management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is generally offered as first-line treatment. Such treatment options include behavioral therapy, pelvic floor muscle therapy, vaginal devices, pharmacologic therapy, and urethral bulking agents. Weight loss management is an example of an effective behavioral strategy in obese patients. Pelvic floor physical therapy alone or under the supervision of skilled providers can significantly improve SUI; however, long-term effects are harder to maintain. Pessaries, vaginal cones, and vaginal inserts have been widely used for treatment of SUI and are beneficial in patients who are motivated to use them. Currently in the United States, there is no FDA-approved medication for the treatment of SUI. Conversely, the European Union has approved and used duloxetine. Urethral bulking agents are indicated for patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency and sometimes used in patients who are not able to undergo surgical procedures for SUI or who have failed said procedures. Three materials are currently FDA approved for urethral bulking in the United States. Many options exist for the nonsurgical management of SUI. This review contains 5 tables and 47 references  Key words:  Stress Urinary Incontinence, conservative treatment, urethral bulking, pelvic floor exercises, incontinence pessaries.  

Bulking agents for minimally invasive correction of stress urinary incontinence in women

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 115-124
Author(s):  
Maria M. Zhevlakova ◽  
Elena I. Rusina
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Fibrous Tissue ◽  
Crosslinking Agent ◽  
Optimal Choice ◽  
Bulking Agents ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Urethral Bulking Agents ◽  
Urethral Bulking

BACKGROUND:The study is relevant due to the widespread prevalence of stress urinary incontinence in women and the search for minimally invasive and safe treatment methods. AIM:The aim of this study was to present data based on modern evidence-based information on the effectiveness of urethral bulking agents and their safety in stress urinary incontinence treatment in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A review of the literature (original articles, systematic reviews) on the use of urethral bulking agents for stress urinary incontinence treatment in women was carried out. RESULTS:Urethral bulking agents for stress urinary incontinence treatment are effective due to the creation of additional bulk in the paraurethral area without fibrosis or because of inflammation followed by fibrous tissue formation. The efficacy and complications depend on the properties of the used urethral bulking agents. Since the performed studies are heterogeneous and the methods for evaluating the use of bulking fillers in stress urinary incontinence treatment vary, it is difficult to comparatively characterize urethral bulking agents to determine the most effective one. The search is being conducted for an ideal proper filler, which should be biocompatible and non-immunogenic and maintain a long-term therapeutic effect. CONCLUSIONS:Urethral bulking injections are an alternative therapy for women with stress urinary incontinence who are informed about its short-term effect and are expecting to avoid the risk of possible complications after surgery. Promising is to be regarded as the use of new urethral bulking agents based on hyaluronic acid with an optimal choice of concentration, degree of crosslinking and type of crosslinking agent to ensure maximum duration of action and minimum side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document