Vaginal mesh repair SYSTEMS for pelvic organ prolapse: Anatomical study comparing transobturator/trangluteal versus single incision techniques

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 1024-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Campagna ◽  
Giovanni Panico ◽  
Andrea Morciano ◽  
Pierre Gadonneix ◽  
Vincent Delmas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Anatomical Study ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Vaginal Mesh ◽  
Repair Systems ◽  
Vaginal Mesh Repair

Changes in urodynamic measurements and bladder neck position after single-incision trans-vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1629-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Hsuan Lau ◽  
Wen-Chu Huang ◽  
Yung-Wen Cheng ◽  
Hsuan Wang ◽  
Tsung-Hsien Su
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Bladder Neck ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Vaginal Mesh ◽  
Neck Position ◽  
Trans Vaginal Mesh

scholarly journals Outcomes of Single Incision Anchored Anterior Vaginal Mesh Repair for Recurrent Vaginal Prolapse

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 384-393
Author(s):  
Loganathan J ◽  
Fayyad AM
Keyword(s):  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Vaginal Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Mesh ◽  
Lightweight Mesh ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Medical Systems ◽  
Anterior Vaginal Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Mesh Repair

Objective: To report the safety and efficacy of single incision anchored anterior vaginal mesh repair for women with recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse.Methods: Retrospective study of women with recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse, Stage 2 or beyond, who underwent single incision anchored vaginal mesh repair with Anterior Elevate (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, USA) between June 2012 and October 2016. Pre-operatively, the Prolapse Quality-of-Life questionnaire (P-QOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12) were completed. Post-operatively, women completed the P-QOL, PISQ-12 and the global impression of improvement questionnaire (PGI-I). Preoperative POP-Q and post operative POP-Q examination at up to 24 months follow up were recorded. At average follow up of 36 months, participants were interviewed via telephone using questions from the P-QOL, PISQ and PGI-I.Results: 45 women had single incision anterior vaginal mesh kit repair for recurrent prolapse. Postoperatively, 85% of women reported cure of their prolapse symptoms. At 24 months, 80.0% had POP-Q stage 0 or 1 in the anterior compartment, and 93.8% achieved anatomical cure of apical prolapse (point C above 0). During structured telephone interview at mean follow up of 36 months, on PGI-I, 70% reported feeling ‘much better’ or ‘very much better’.Conclusion: Vaginal surgery using single incision lightweight mesh kits can be an effective approach for women with recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse, resulting in subjective and objective cure rates of over 80% with reasonable safety profile up to 60 months postoperatively.

Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: results of a cohort study

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 901-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Hsien Su ◽  
Hui-Hsuan Lau ◽  
Wen-Chu Huang ◽  
Ching-Hung Hsieh ◽  
Rhu-Chu Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document