scholarly journals Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1342-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan D. Uren ◽  
Nikki Cotterill ◽  
Sophie E. Parke ◽  
Paul Abrams
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Equivalence

Psychometric Equivalence of Standard and Prorated Boston Naming Test Scores

Assessment ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 107319112098392
Author(s):  
Danielle Zimmerman ◽  
J. Attridge ◽  
Summer Rolin ◽  
Jeremy Davis
Keyword(s):  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Concordance Correlation ◽  
Physical Medicine ◽  
Boston Naming Test ◽  
Item Score ◽  
Perfect Agreement ◽  
Psychometric Equivalence ◽  
Equivalence Tests ◽  
Naming Test

This study compared prorated Boston Naming Test (BNT-P; omitting the noose item) and standard administration (BNT-S) scores in physical medicine and rehabilitation patients ( N = 480). The sample was 34% female and 91% White with average age and education of 46 ( SD = 15) and 14 ( SD = 3) years, respectively. BNT-P was calculated by summing correct responses excluding item 48 and estimating the 60-item score with cross multiplication and division. BNT-P and BNT-S scores were compared via concordance correlation (CC) coefficients; reflected and log transformed data were examined with equivalence tests. BNT-P and BNT-S scores showed almost perfect agreement (CC = .99). Transformed scores demonstrated equivalence (±1.1 points). Raw and scaled score differences were 0 in 88% and 96% of cases, respectively. Race and ethnicity accounted for item 48 outcomes while controlling for age and education. Findings support the utility of prorated BNT scores in rehabilitation patients.

The Personal Wellbeing Index: Psychometric Equivalence for Adults and School Children

2011 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 913-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian J. Tomyn ◽  
Matthew D. Fuller Tyszkiewicz ◽  
Robert A. Cummins
Keyword(s):  
School Children ◽  
Personal Wellbeing Index ◽  
Psychometric Equivalence ◽  
Wellbeing Index ◽  
Personal Wellbeing

Online administration of questionnaires assessing psychological, physical, and sexual aggression: Establishing psychometric equivalence.

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Brock ◽  
Robin A. Barry ◽  
Erika Lawrence ◽  
Jaci Rolffs ◽  
Jodi Cerretani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Aggression ◽  
Psychometric Equivalence

The Psychometric Equivalence of Two Alternate Forms of the Controlled Oral Word Association Test

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Ross ◽  
Ashley E. Furr ◽  
Sara E. Carter ◽  
Marc Weinberg
Keyword(s):  
Word Association ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Psychometric Equivalence ◽  
Word Association Test ◽  
Alternate Forms

Psychometric Equivalence of Recorded Spondaic Words as Test Items

1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 516-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Bilger ◽  
Melanie L. Matthies ◽  
Ted A. Meyer ◽  
Scott K. Griffiths
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Equivalence ◽  
Test Items

scholarly journals Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Giromini ◽  
Claudia Pignolo ◽  
Gerald Young ◽  
Eric Y. Drogin ◽  
Alessandro Zennaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Scores ◽  
Symptom Validity ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Validity Test ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Psychometric Equivalence ◽  
Remote Testing ◽  
Inventory Of Problems ◽  
Symptom Validity Test ◽  
Paper And Pencil

AbstractWhile the psychometric equivalence of computerized versus paper-and-pencil administration formats has been documented for some tests, so far very few studies have focused on the comparability and validity of test scores obtained via in-person versus remote administrations, and none of them have researched a symptom validity test (SVT). To contribute to fill this gap in the literature, we investigated the scores of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) generated by various administration formats. More specifically, Study 1 evaluated the equivalence of scores from nonclinical individuals administered the IOP-29 remotely (n = 146) versus in-person via computer (n = 140) versus in-person via paper-and-pencil format (n = 140). Study 2 reviewed published IOP-29 studies conducted using remote/online versus in-person, paper-and-pencil test administrations to determine if remote testing could adversely influence the validity of IOP-29 test results. Taken together, our findings suggest that the effectiveness of the IOP-29 is preserved when alternating between face-to-face and online/remote formats.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document