Outcomes of three sling procedures at the time of abdominal sacral colpopexy

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 482-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan W. Tubre ◽  
Priya Padmanabhan ◽  
Clifton F. Frilot ◽  
Wesley Porta ◽  
Alex Gomelsky
Keyword(s):  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

scholarly journals Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy In Treatment Of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: By Less Invasive Method

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
Nahar Nurun ◽  
Molina Rani Kundu ◽  
Naher Akterun
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Invasive Method ◽  
The Impact

Objective: To assess the outcomes of abdominal sacral colpopexy in less invasive method. Study design: It was a prospective study conducted in Comilla Medical College Hospital and Comilla General Hospital during the period from 2005 to 2009.Method: Thirty women with vaginal vault prolapse were selected by inclusion and exclusion criteria in a consecutive, exhaustive method. Primary outcome measurements were included subjective, objective and patient-determined success rate. Secondary outcome included the impact on bowel, bladder, sexual function and quality of life. Result: Result shows that, vault prolapse is mostly associated with older patients, age more than sixty (66.7%), para >5 (60%) and menopausal women (66.7%). Vault prolapse was mostly associated with cystocele (93.3%), stress incontinence (76.7%) and more common following abdominal hysterectomy (70%). During operation the dissection was less (3-4cm). Average operating time was 54.33/min; average estimated blood loss was 49.17/ml. One patient required blood transfusion, one developed haematoma during surgery, no gut injury or haemodynamic instability developed. Post operatively, no internal haemorrhage, 4 patient developed fever (13.3%), wound infection one (3.3%), UTI 4 patients (13.3%), no voiding difficulty or thromboembolism and one patient developed mesh rejection (3.3%). After one year follow-up success rate was 96.7%. Conclusion: Abdominal sacral colpopexy is a safe and effective method for correction of vaginal vault prolapse. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjog.v25i1.13723 Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2010; Vol. 25(1) : 3-8

OPEN ABDOMINAL SACRAL COLPOPEXY

2008 ◽  
pp. 724-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi Chiung Grace Chen ◽  
Marie Fidela R. Paraiso
Keyword(s):  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy for Posthysterectomy Vaginal Vault Descensus

1995 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 719-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda K. Podratz ◽  
Verna R. Ferguson ◽  
Raymond A. Lee Hoverman ◽  
Richard E. Symmonds
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

Vaginal Mesh Erosion After Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 410-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony G. Visco ◽  
Alison C. Weidner ◽  
Matthew D. Barber ◽  
Evan R. Myers ◽  
Geoffrey W. Cundiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mesh Erosion ◽  
Vaginal Mesh ◽  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy with Mersilene Mesh

2002 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Leonardo ◽  
G. Gentili ◽  
F. Leonardo
Keyword(s):  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

Entero Mesh Vaginal Fistula Secondary to Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

2004 ◽  
Vol 103 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 1035-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Hopkins ◽  
Christopher Rooney
Keyword(s):  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Vaginal Fistula ◽  
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

Safety of Combined Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Sigmoid Resection With Suture Rectopexy

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon VanderPas Lamb ◽  
Jason Massengill ◽  
Michael J. Sheridan ◽  
Lawrence E. Stern ◽  
Walter von Pechmann
Keyword(s):  
Sigmoid Resection ◽  
Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy ◽  
Suture Rectopexy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document