The efficacy of in-and-out catheterization as a way of trial without catheterization strategy for treatment of acute urinary retention induced by benign prostate hyperplasia: Variables predicting success outcome

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Hwii Ko ◽  
Jin Wook Kim ◽  
Sung Gu Kang ◽  
Hoon Ah Jang ◽  
Seok Ho Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Benign Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Predicting Success ◽  
Benign Prostate

scholarly journals MP35-15 CLINICAL FEATURES OF HYDRONEPHROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH BENIGN PROSTATE HYPERPLASIA AND ACUTE URINARY RETENTION

2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Heng Lu ◽  
Howard Hong-Hao Wu ◽  
Yu-Hua Fan ◽  
Chih-Chieh Lin ◽  
Yi-Hsiu Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Benign Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Benign Prostate

Holmium laser enucleation of prostate for patients with acute urinary retention due to benign prostate hyperplasia: Efficacy and safety

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pu Li(Former Corresponding Author) ◽  
Jun Tao ◽  
Chengming Wang ◽  
Min Tang ◽  
Xiaoxin Meng(New Corresponding Author)
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Benign Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Holmium Laser ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Urinary Flow ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Laser Enucleation ◽  
Benign Prostate ◽  
Holmium Laser Enucleation

Abstract Background Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in older men, and part of patients develop acute urinary retention (AUR) at the time of initial treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) for patients with BPH in setting of AUR. Methods The clinical data of 88 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP surgery in our center were retrospectively analyzed. AUR existed in 34 patients and the other 54 patients had no AUR. The general information, prostate volume, urodynamic parameters and intraoperative parameters were recoeded and compared. The outcome were recorded and analysed including the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life score (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-voiding residual (PVR). Results In both groups, the preoperative parameters were equivalent except for the white blood cell in urinalysis. All the HoLEP procedures were smoothly carried out. The intr- and post-operative complications were low in both groups and no difference were detected. All the patients were followed up for at least 6 months. IPSS, QoL, Qmax and PVR were all improved in both groups. No statistical differences were obtained in these parameters between groups. Conclusion s HoLEP could be a safe and effective treatment for BPH patients either with or without AUR. The efficacy was immediate and sustained during the short-term follow-up session in both groups.

Efficacy of Doxazosin in the Treatment of Acute Urinary Retention due to Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

2008 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Prieto ◽  
Jesús Romero ◽  
Cristóbal López ◽  
Manuel Ortiz ◽  
Juan Jose Pacheco
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Benign Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Benign Prostate

scholarly journals IPP AS PREDICTIVE FACTOR FOR ACUTE URINARY RETENTION IN BPH PATIENTS

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taufiq Nur Budaya ◽  
Basuki B. Purnomo ◽  
Besut Daryanto ◽  
Kurnia Penta Seputra ◽  
Paksi Satyagraha
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Predictive Factor ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Benign Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D ◽  
Benign Prostate

Objective: To demonstrate usefulness of Intra Prostatic Protrusion (IPP) as Predictive Factor for Acute Urinary Retention (AUR) in Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) Patients. Material & methods: Cross sectional retrospective study of case records from January to July 2012 of BPH patients at Saiful Anwar General Hospital (SAGH) Malang was carried out. The data were collected from the Medical Record Division in SAGH Malang. We noted age, prostate volume, IPP, IPSS and urinary retention status. The patients were classified by IPP degree < 5 mm (group A), 5-10 mm (group B), 10 -15mm (group C), > 15mm (group D) and we compared all parameters that we noticed. Results: Eighty patients, mean age was 66.32 years were enrolled. Transabdominal ultrasound determined the mean IPP was 13.5 mm, and prostatic volume 95 cc. IPP values were distributed as follows: group A 10 (12.5%), group B 25 (31.25%), group C 24 (30%), group D 21 (26.25%), with AUR incidence in group A 20%, group B 36%, group C 79%, and group D 81%. The IPP showed a significant correlation with urinary retention (r = 0.8, p < 0.05, OR = 15) and IPSS (r = 0.6, p < 0.05). Conclusion: IPP can be used as predictive factor for the incidence of acute urinary retention in BPH Patients.Keywords: Intra Prostatic Protrusion, Acute Urinary Retention, Benign Prostate Hyperplasia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document