scholarly journals Two Decades of Advancement in Flathead Catfish Research

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham F. Montague ◽  
Daniel E. Shoup
Keyword(s):  
Flathead Catfish

scholarly journals Evaluation of Stomach Tubes and Gastric Lavage for Sampling Diets from Blue Catfish and Flathead Catfish

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 258-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Scott Waters ◽  
Thomas J. Kwak ◽  
Joshua B. Arnott ◽  
William E. Pine
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Lavage ◽  
Blue Catfish ◽  
Flathead Catfish

Conservation, Ecology, and Management of Catfish: The Second International Symposium

2011 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Population Dynamics ◽  
Channel Catfish ◽  
Mississippi River ◽  
Upper Mississippi River ◽  
Catch Per Unit Effort ◽  
Blue Catfish ◽  
Resource Monitoring ◽  
Flathead Catfish ◽  
Unit Effort ◽  
Catch Rates

<em>Abstract</em>.—Using Long Term Resource Monitoring Program data collected from impounded (Pool 26) and unimpounded (Open River) reaches of the upper Mississippi River, we investigated population dynamics of flathead catfish <em>Pylodictis olivaris</em>, channel catfish <em>Ictalurus punctatus</em>, and blue catfish <em>I. furcatus</em> from random sites located in side channel border (SCB) and main channel border (MCB) habitats. Objectives were to (1) compare trends (1993–2007) of three catfishes collected in Pool 26 and Open River reaches of the upper Mississippi River, and (2) provide needed information to managers on population dynamics through time using a binary gear approach of active (i.e., daytime electrofishing) and passive gears (hoopnetting). Active gears resulted in a higher catch per unit effort (CPUE) of all catfishes in each habitat–reach combination as compared to passive gears. Passive gears resulted in negligible catches of blue catfish and flathead catfishes (e.g., mean of <1 fish/net night). Catch per unit effort using active gear resulted in a greater number of channel catfish captured in Pool 26 compared to the Open River, with Open River SCB habitat having the lowest CPUE in most years. Blue catfish in the Open River had a higher CPUE using active gear as compared to Pool 26, with the Open River MCB having the greatest CPUE. Flathead catfish had a higher CPUE in MCB habitat compared to SCB habitat, with the Open River MCB having the highest CPUE in most years. However, declining trends in flathead catfish appears to be occurring in Open River habitats while trends in flathead catfish appear to be slightly increasing in Pool 26. The most common length-classes captured were substock and stock-sized fish regardless of habitat, species, or reach. Trends for channel catfish were easily determined due to high catch rates; however, more monitoring and enhanced sampling is needed to accurately assess flathead catfish and blue catfish trends and to accurately determine demographics for all three species.

Conservation, Ecology, and Management of Catfish: The Second International Symposium

2011 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ictalurus Punctatus ◽  
Channel Catfish ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Growth Data ◽  
Blue Catfish ◽  
Brown Bullhead ◽  
Black Bullhead ◽  
Flathead Catfish ◽  
The North ◽  
Shared Environmental Factor

<em>Abstract</em>.—Growth rates are a core characteristic of catfish populations that are of increasing research interest. However, few studies have synthesized growth data across catfish populations and species to examine large-scale drivers of catfish growth. Here, a metaanalysis of growth was conducted for channel catfish <em>Ictalurus punctatus</em>, blue catfish <em>I. furcatus</em>, flathead catfish <em>Pylodictis olivaris</em>, brown bullhead <em>Ameiurus nebulosus</em>, and black bullhead <em>A. melas</em>, and relationships were documented between growth and climate variables, hydrologic habitats (lentic versus lotic), and latitudinal countergradients (a tendency for faster subannual growth in the north). Blue catfish, black bullhead, and brown bullhead growth correlated significantly and positively with temperature metrics. Blue catfish, flat-head catfish, and brown bullhead growth also correlated significantly and positively with sunshine fraction, wind speed, and evapotranspiration. Channel catfi sh growth did not correlate to any climate metrics. After removal of growth effects related to climate, blue catfish and brown bullhead had significantly faster growth in lotic than lentic habitats. Channel catfish and black bullhead had faster growth in lentic than lotic habitats. Flathead catfish showed no difference in growth between hydrologic habitat types. After standardizing growth by postsexual maturation age and the thermal opportunity for growth, significant and highly predictive countergradient growth relationships (mean <em>r </em><sup>2 </sup> = 0.47) were found for all five species across sites (i.e., faster temperature-standardized growth in more northerly populations). Slopes of these relationships did not differ among species, suggesting similar responses to latitude. There may be a genetic basis for countergradient growth in catfishes that developed over evolutionary scales via selection by a shared environmental factor. Catfish growth is variable within and among species but can be intensely shaped by all three primary factors evaluated in this study.

Conservation, Ecology, and Management of Catfish: The Second International Symposium

2011 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Symposium ◽  
Size Structure ◽  
Pylodictis Olivaris ◽  
Social Event ◽  
Conservation Ecology ◽  
Party Size ◽  
Catch And Release ◽  
Flathead Catfish ◽  
Creel Survey ◽  
Total Effort

<em>Abstract</em>.—Hand grabbing for catfish has been practiced in Mississippi for many years; however, few studies have addressed this fishing technique. Ross Barnett Reservoir is a<em> Abstract</em>.—Hand grabbing for catfish has been practiced in Mississippi for many years; however, few studies have addressed this fishing technique. Ross Barnett Reservoir is a 13,360-ha impoundment located in central Mississippi that supports a substantial hand grabbing fishery. A roving creel survey was conducted during the 2007 and 2008 Mississippi hand grabbing season (May 1–July 15). Objectives were to estimate catch, harvest, and effort of hand grabbers and to solicit information concerning techniques used by these anglers. A total of 37 parties was interviewed, consisting of 150 total anglers. Seventy percent of the parties interviewed targeted flathead catfish <em>Pylodictis olivaris</em>. Ninety-five percent of the parties used a probe, and all parties fished boxes located at depths of 1–2 m. Average party size was four anglers, indicating that hand grabbing is a social event. For 2007 and 2008, anglers spent an estimated 4,424 and 5,259 h hand grabbing, respectively. An estimated 3,313 and 2,589 catfish were harvested in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Based on size structure of harvested catfish, hand grabbing anglers at Ross Barnett Reservoir do not appear to be size-selective. Most anglers were harvest-oriented, with catch-and-release estimates making up only 12% and 9%, respectively. Future creel surveys should be directed at the total effort allocated toward catfishing, in an effort to determine the effect of hand grabbing on Ross Barnett Reservoir.

Conservation, Ecology, and Management of Catfish: The Second International Symposium

2011 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Site Fidelity ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Population Abundance ◽  
Conservation Ecology ◽  
Temporary Emigration ◽  
Minnesota River ◽  
Flathead Catfish ◽  
High Site

<em>Abstract</em>.—The flathead catfish <em>Pylodictis olivaris</em> is one of the most important game fishes in the lower Minnesota River, providing a high-quality angling fishery. Information on flathead catfish movements and site fidelity in the Minnesota River at the reach scale is needed before fisheries managers consider options such as reach-specific fishing regulations. In addition, this information is necessary to determine if estimates of population abundance are feasible and what study design is most appropriate. Therefore, 18 radio- and acoustic-tagged adult flathead catfish were manually located in the lower Minnesota River during late summer and fall in 2008 and 2009. Most fish remained within about 2 km of their capture locations during daylight hours in August–September 2008. However, 17% of the fish emigrated from the 9.3-km study reach before the end of September, and all emigrated by the end of October. Fourteen (78%) of the original 18 fish survived and were present in the study reach again during August–September 2009. High site fidelity could result in heterogeneous vulnerability to late-summer angling among river reaches if some individual fish consistently return to areas frequented by anglers and others return to more remote and relatively inaccessible areas. Due to high survival and late-summer site fidelity, the potential exists for high recapture probabilities with repeated late-summer mark–recapture sampling in the same study reach; however, there is evidence that temporary emigration could be an important issue in long-term studies.

Conservation, Ecology, and Management of Catfish: The Second International Symposium

2011 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Symposium ◽  
Body Condition ◽  
Relative Abundance ◽  
Habitat Restoration ◽  
Missouri River ◽  
Natural State ◽  
Pylodictis Olivaris ◽  
Conservation Ecology ◽  
Flathead Catfish ◽  
Growth Increments

<em>Abstract</em>.—An assessment of the flathead catfish <em>Pylodictis olivaris</em> population in the Missouri River bordering Nebraska was conducted between 1997 through 2008. The Missouri River was divided into four sections based on physical and geomorphologic uniqueness (upper unchannelized, lower unchannelized, upper channelized, and lower channelized). Two sections were sampled annually, and each section was sampled on alternate years. Boat electrofishing collected 12,846 fish in 83.5 h from 701 sampling stations. Most flathead catfish sampled (98%) were less than 510 mm total length (quality length), with significantly more fish captured in channelized than unchannelized reach. Fish from channelized sections also had higher mean total lengths and larger growth increments but were in poorer body condition than those from unchannelized sections. Low relative abundance of flathead catfish in the upper unchannelized section and scarcity of large individuals were attributed to poor habitat conditions. Habitat restoration along with restoring natural riverine processes would return the river to a more natural state and would not only benefit flathead catfish, but other native Missouri River fishes as well.

scholarly journals Population dynamics of introduced flathead catfish in Lake Mitchell, South Dakota

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
David O. Lucchesi ◽  
Matthew D. Wagner ◽  
Tanner M. Stevens ◽  
B. D. S. Graeb
Keyword(s):  
Population Dynamics ◽  
South Dakota ◽  
Flathead Catfish
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document