Occurrence and Co‐Occurrence Patterns of Gar in River–Floodplain Habitats: Methods to Leverage Species Coexistence to Benefit Distributional Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 622-637
Author(s):  
David A. Schumann ◽  
Michael E. Colvin ◽  
Leandro E. Miranda ◽  
D. Todd Jones‐Farrand
Hydrobiologia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 804 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Maria Lemke ◽  
James R. Herkert ◽  
Jeffery W. Walk ◽  
K. Douglas Blodgett

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon G McNickle ◽  
Morgan V Ritzi ◽  
Kliffi M.S. Blackstone ◽  
John J Couture ◽  
Taylor Nelson ◽  
...  

Understanding drivers of species coexistence is a central challenge in ecology. Coexistence cannot be observed directly, and while species co-occurrence in time and space is necessary for coexistence, it is not sufficient to prove coexistence. Species exclusion from a region is potentially observable, but can take decades to occur, and still might occur stochastically. Thus, ecologists generally use theory to identify indirect observations that are indicative of mechanisms driving coexistence or exclusion. Various methods have been developed to indirectly infer coexistence, each of which requires different data, and none of which are usually conclusive on their own. Here, we demonstrate agreement using three different approaches examining coexistence of multiple hardwood species. First, in an experimental planting of three mature tree species we found no relationship between productivity and species diversity, which could be due to a lack of niche differences among species. Second, we used modern coexistence theory to calculate niche and fitness differences for each pair of species, which confirmed the lack of niche differences among species, and showed high fitness differences that could create a neutral distribution of species in nature. Third, we used the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Inventory and Analysis data to examine co-occurrence patterns of our species across thousands of natural forest stands and found that indeed, these three species were distributed randomly throughout the USA. Given that these independent methods agree, we take this as strong evidence about a lack of coexistence.


2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmundo C. Drago ◽  
Karl M. Wantzen ◽  
Aldo R. Paira

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 10249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela E. Echevarría ◽  
Nirson González

The co-occurrence patterns of fish communities in the littorals of three lagoons of the Orinoco River floodplain in Venezuela were studied during four hydrological phases: low, rising, high and falling waters, from 2008–2009, using null models.  The analyses were made separately for each floodplain lake and for each habitat type within them.  During low waters only one lake showed a segregated pattern in beaches covered with leaf litter, whereas in the other floodplain lakes the communities were randomly assembled in all habitats during the four hydrological phases.  Despite the absence of a significant overall structure, several significantly aggregated and segregated species pairs were observed in the three lakes.  The temporal variation might be the main factor responsible for the co-occurrence patterns observed in these floodplain lakes due to the periodic reshuffling of littoral habitats. 


Wetlands ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 847-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Ostojić ◽  
Joana Rosado ◽  
Marko Miliša ◽  
Manuela Morais ◽  
Klement Tockner

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 716 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred W. B. Van den Brink ◽  
Gerard Van der Velde ◽  
Sander Wijnhoven

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document