scholarly journals Prognostic factors for response to treatment by corticosteroid injection or surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome (palms study): A prospective multicenter cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Jerosch‐Herold ◽  
Lee Shepstone ◽  
Julie Houghton ◽  
Edward C. F. Wilson ◽  
Julian Blake
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Multicenter Cohort ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Prognostic factors in carpal tunnel syndrome treated with a corticosteroid injection

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 763-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Meys ◽  
Sam Thissen ◽  
Stan Rozeman ◽  
Roy Beekman
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

The long-term follow-up of treatment with corticosteroid injections in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. When are multiple injections indicated?

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 634-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Berger ◽  
M. Vermeulen ◽  
J. H. T. M. Koelman ◽  
I. N. van Schaik ◽  
Y. B. W. E. M. Roos
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Corticosteroid Injections

The objective of this prospective study was to investigate the long-term effect of one or more local corticosteroid injections in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and whether a good response can be predicted. Follow-up visits took place at 3 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after the first corticosteroid injection. Thirty of the 120 patients (25%) had a good outcome with a single injection, 11 additional patients (9%) needed a second injection, and five patients (4%) needed a third injection to reach a good outcome after 1 year. Of patients with an initial good treatment response, 28 (52%) had a good outcome after 1 year compared with 18 (27 %) who had an initially moderate or no response to treatment. One-third of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome had a long-term beneficial effect from corticosteroid injection, especially when they had a good initial response.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Local Corticosteroid in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
Anis Ahmed ◽  
Md Rafiqul Islam ◽  
Hasan Zahidur Rahman ◽  
Md Moniruzzaman Bhuiyan ◽  
Sukumar Majumder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Steroid ◽  
Steroid Group ◽  
Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Local Steroid Injection

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common health problem in Bangladesh especially among women. It causes significant morbidity and reduces work output in affected patients. There are few treatment options available like oral steroid, steroid injection, UST, surgical treatment etc. Considering the cost, time and consequence of surgery, short term nonsurgical management is desirable e.g. local steroid injection in the affected limb. Therefore a comparative analysis is necessary to understand the efficacy of local steroid injection.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: 60 idiopathic CTS patients divided into two groups by randomization. One group received Inj. Triamcinolone 30 mg close to carpal tunnel and other group received oral steroids. Efficacies of treatmemt were compared in between groups.Result: The mean age of two groups were 37.5 ± 10.5 and 37.0 ± 10.24 years respectively (p = 0.272) and Majority of the patients in both treatment groups (76.7% in local steroid and 80% in oral steroid groups, p = 0.754) were female. Relief from tingling sensation and nocturnal awakening was higher in the steroid injection receivers (100% and 86.7% respectively) than that in the oral steroid receivers (6.9% and 3.4% respectively) during evaluation of outcome at the end of 3 month. End point treatment shows that none but SNAP at wrist in the local steroid group improved significantly better than that in the oral steroid group (16.2 ± 10.5 vs. 12.4 ± 6.3, p =0.039). No major side effects occurred in local steroid group except depigmentation in injected area 3 (10%) cases.Conclusion: It may be concluded that local steroid injection is an effective treatment of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. But long-term efficacy of steroid injection remains uncertain.Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2012; Vol. 28 (1): 10-15

Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel L Ashworth ◽  
Jeremy D P Bland ◽  
Kristine M Chapman ◽  
Gaetan Tardif ◽  
Loai Albarqouni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Local Corticosteroid Injection

Cochrane corner: local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 911-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Stark ◽  
R. Amirfeyz
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Local Corticosteroid Injection

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a clinical syndrome manifested by signs and symptoms of irritation of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel in the wrist. Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome has been studied but its effectiveness is unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome versus placebo injection or other non-surgical interventions. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials register (searched May 2006), MEDLINE (searched January 1966 to May 2006), EMBASE (searched January 1980 to May 2006) and CINAHL (searched January 1982 to May 2006). Selection criteria: Randomized or quasi-randomized studies. Data collection and analysis: Three authors independently selected the trials and rated their overall quality. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each trial and summary relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were also calculated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document