scholarly journals Technical Note: A method for quality assurance of landmark sets for use in evaluation of deformable image registration accuracy of lung parenchyma

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 766-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Guy ◽  
Elisabeth Weiss ◽  
Nuzhat Jan ◽  
Gary E. Christensen ◽  
Geoffrey D. Hugo
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Cazoulat ◽  
Brian M Anderson ◽  
Molly M McCulloch ◽  
Bastien Rigaud ◽  
Eugene J Koay ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Mee ◽  
Kate Stewart ◽  
Marika Lathouras ◽  
Helen Truong ◽  
Catriona Hargrave

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 3023-3031
Author(s):  
Hisamichi Takagi ◽  
Noriyuki Kadoya ◽  
Tomohiro Kajikawa ◽  
Shohei Tanaka ◽  
Yoshiki Takayama ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideharu Miura ◽  
Shuichi Ozawa ◽  
Minoru Nakao ◽  
Kengo Furukawa ◽  
Yoshiko Doi ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Kubota ◽  
Masahiko Okamoto ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Shintaro Shiba ◽  
Shohei Okazaki ◽  
...  

We aimed to clarify the accuracy of rigid image registration and deformable image registration (DIR) in carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for pancreatic cancer. Six patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated with passive irradiation CIRT were enrolled. Three registration patterns were evaluated: treatment planning computed tomography images (TPCT) to CT images acquired in the treatment room (IRCT) in the supine position, TPCT to IRCT in the prone position, and TPCT in the supine position to the prone position. After warping the contours of the original CT images to the destination CT images using deformation matrices from the registration, the warped delineated contours on the destination CT images were compared with the original ones using mean displacement to agreement (MDA). Four contours (clinical target volume (CTV), gross tumor volume (GTV), stomach, duodenum) and four registration algorithms (rigid image registration [RIR], intensity-based DIR [iDIR], contour-based DIR [cDIR], and a hybrid iDIR-cDIR ([hDIR]) were evaluated. The means ± standard deviation of the MDAs of all contours for RIR, iDIR, cDIR, and hDIR were 3.40 ± 3.30, 2.2 1± 2.48, 1.46 ± 1.49, and 1.46 ± 1.37 mm, respectively. There were significant differences between RIR and iDIR, and between RIR/iDIR and cDIR/hDIR. For the pancreatic cancer patient images, cDIR and hDIR had better accuracy than RIR and iDIR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 015006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornel Zachiu ◽  
Baudouin Denis de Senneville ◽  
Bas W Raaymakers ◽  
Mario Ries

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haksoo Kim ◽  
Samuel B. Park ◽  
James I. Monroe ◽  
Bryan J. Traughber ◽  
Yiran Zheng ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 2412-2415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiezhi Zhang ◽  
Nigel P. Orton ◽  
T. Rockwell Mackie ◽  
Bhudatt R. Paliwal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document