scholarly journals Model-based dose reconstruction for CT dose estimation

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. e255-e263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingye Wu ◽  
Zhye Yin ◽  
Bruno De Man
2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (6Part23) ◽  
pp. 392-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Huang ◽  
A Faught ◽  
S Benhabib ◽  
R Cardan ◽  
I Brezovich ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (1090) ◽  
pp. 20180287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Ueda ◽  
Naamit K Gerber ◽  
Indra J Das

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 2052-2055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Lan Liao ◽  
Hui-Chuan Kao ◽  
Keh-Shih Chuang ◽  
Chih-Ping Chen ◽  
Hui-Yu Tsai

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
K. Stamoulis ◽  
K. G. Ioannides ◽  
H. Bakola ◽  
C. A. Papachristodoulou ◽  
L. M. Tsodoulos

Following a large-scale nuclear event, a quantitative estimate of the radiation dose to the general population necessitates the availability of adequate procedures for the assessment of doses. The main objectives of dose reconstruction, namely retrospective dosimetry can be synoptically stated as in the following: a) To guide the provision of proper protection for the population that had been exposed to radiation, b) To provide assuring information to the worrying public and c) To provide input data for epidemiological studies. Amongst the methods used for dose estimation are the Thermoluminescence (TL) and the Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL). Methods based on TL and OSL have the advantage that they allow the measurement of the integrated absorbed dose. When the irradiation comes from external sources, materials found within the perimeter of the accident area such as bricks, tiles and pottery and certain household chemicals, can be used. The absorbed dose may be evaluated many years after the accident.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6Part15) ◽  
pp. 3185-3185
Author(s):  
M Chao ◽  
J Penagaricano ◽  
Y Yan ◽  
E Moros ◽  
K Gardner ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 2740-2751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno De Man ◽  
Mingye Wu ◽  
Paul FitzGerald ◽  
Mannudeep Kalra ◽  
Zhye Yin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document