Digital subtraction angiography in selection of the vascularized greater trochanter bone grafting for treatment of osteonecrosis of femoral head

Microsurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 656-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewei Zhao ◽  
Yu Xiaobing ◽  
Tienan Wang ◽  
Benjie Wang ◽  
Baoyi Liu ◽  
...  
1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 212-214
Author(s):  
S. Nishi ◽  
N. Hashimoto ◽  
T. Todaka ◽  
A. Nomura

There are various methods for measuring an affected vascular size during embolization or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Metallic balls, electrodes, grids, coins on the skin were simple and useful in this sense, but not stable and exact for measuring. A 0.014 “or 0.016” microguide wire with 5 gold markers in the tip is newly developed and used clinically (a scaler guide). One marker measures 1 mm in length. There is a distance of 4 mm between two neighboring markers. A microcatheter is navigated using a standard microguide wire into the vessels of the lesion. Bilateral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is performed after exchange of a microguide wire with a scaler guide. Magnification ratio between distance measured by DSA and real distance from markers is calculated. Thereafter, the size of the vessels will be measured. With this method, the size of vessels was measured in patients with aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation or stenotic lesion. Selection of coils or PTA balloons could be made easily and effectively. Interventions were more safely performed with this new scaler guide.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
QiZhong Lai ◽  
Kaishen Cai ◽  
Tianye Lin ◽  
Peng Yang ◽  
Binglang Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Core decompression bone grafting usually is used hip-preserving approach for osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH). Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an adjuvant therapy, combined with core decompression bone grafting for ONFH. However, it remains controversial. Therefore, its efficacy was systematically evaluated and meta-analysis in this study.Methods: Literature on core decompression bone grafting for ONFH was retrieved in CNKI, Wan Fang, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from inception to March 2021. Review Manager 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software were used for data synthesis.Results: A total of 10 RCTs were included. The results showed at final follow-up that, Harris hip score was significantly difference in the treatment group, adjuvant therapy with PRP (group A) better than the control group (group B), MD=7.53 [95%CI (5.29,9.77)],P < 0.00001. There was MD=-0.71[95%CI (-0.96, -0.46)], P < 0.00001, of visual analog scale (VAS) of hip pain between the two groups. The excellent and good rate of function of hip was 1.42-fold higher in group A than that in group B, RR=1.42, 95%CI (1.25,1.62), P<0.00001. The progression and total hip arthroplasty were showed improvements, RR=0.37,95%CI (0.21,0.65), P=0.0006 and RR=0.39,95%CI (0.18,0.85), P=0.02, respectively. Begg's and Egger's tests did not indicate publication bias.Conclusion: It was shown that the use of PRP combined with core decompression bone grafting improved the symptoms better than core decompression bone grafting only, and might delay progression and total hip arthroplasty. However, as the study’s limitations, it needed to be fully verified by more large-sample multicenter prospective clinical studies.


2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1004-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junhwan Kim ◽  
Martin R. Prince ◽  
Ramin Zabih ◽  
Jeff Bezanson ◽  
Richard Watts ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Rong Zeng ◽  
Sheng He ◽  
Wen-Jun Feng ◽  
Fei-long Li ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document