Peroneal nerve lesion after sural nerve graft harvest: An unusual complication?case report

Microsurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinrich M. Schubert ◽  
Gottfried Wechselberger ◽  
Heribert Hussl ◽  
Thomas Schoeller
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 306
Author(s):  
Jeong-Hyun Cheon ◽  
Jae-Ho Chung ◽  
Eul-Sik Yoon ◽  
Byung-Il Lee ◽  
Seung-Ha Park

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3823
Author(s):  
Karl Schwaiger ◽  
Selim Abed ◽  
Elisabeth Russe ◽  
Fabian Koeninger ◽  
Julia Wimbauer ◽  
...  

Background: Proximal radial nerve lesions located between the brachial plexus and its division into the superficial and deep branches are rare but severe injuries. The majority of these lesions occur in association with humerus fractures, directly during trauma or later during osteosynthesis for fracture treatment. Diagnostics and surgical interventions are often delayed. The best type of surgical treatment and the outcome to be expected often is uncertain. Methods: Twelve patients with proximal radial nerve lesions due to trauma or prior surgery were included in this study and underwent neurolysis (n = 6) and sural nerve graft interposition (n = 6). Retrospective analysis of the collected patient data was performed and the postoperative course was systematically evaluated. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and the LSUHS (Louisiana State University Health Sciences) scores were used to determine regeneration after surgery. Comparison between the patients’ and calculated normative DASH scores was performed. Results: All patients had a traumatically or iatrogenically induced proximal radial nerve lesion and underwent secondary treatments. The average time from radial nerve lesion occurrence to surgical intervention was approximately four months (1.5–10 months). Eight patients (66.67%) had a humeral fracture. During follow up, no statistically significant difference between the calculated normative and the patients’ DASH scores was observed. The LSUHS scores were at least satisfactory. Conclusions: Neurolysis or sural nerve graft interposition performed within a specific period of time are the primary treatment options for radial nerve lesions. They should be performed depending on the lesion type. Regeneration to a satisfactory degree was observed in all patients, and the majority achieved full recovery of sensory and motor functions. This was the first study to highlight the efficiency of neurolysis and sural nerve graft interposition as secondary treatment interventions, especially for radial nerve lesions.


Author(s):  
Si-Gyun Roh ◽  
Jae Young Chun ◽  
Nae-Ho Lee ◽  
Jin Yong Shin ◽  
Jong-Lim Kim

Injury of peripheral nerve may require reconstruction for motor and sensory function recovery. However, when the nerve defect is long, especially in the lower extremities, reconstruction with successful function recovery proved to be difficult. We documented a case of bilateral vascularized sural nerve graft repair of a large and long sciatic nerve defect following malignant tumor resection on posterior thigh. Although we were unable to achieve satisfactory outcomes in motor function recovery, we did accomplish some sensory function recovery.


2019 ◽  
pp. 393-402
Author(s):  
Michael Klebuc

Microneurovascular muscle flaps can be effectively employed to reanimate the paralyzed mid-face. This chapter explores the indications and contraindications for free muscle flap smile restoration. Various sources of innervation are examined including the motor nerve to masseter and cross-face nerve grafts, as are different muscle flap donor sites. A detailed description of facial nerve exploration, sural nerve graft harvest, and the cross-face nerve graft procedure are provided. Single and two-staged facial reanimation procedures utilizing free gracilis muscle flaps are also described in detail, including technical nuances, postoperative care, and physical therapy. The technique is well suited for individuals whose native muscles of facial expression have failed to develop in utero, undergone irreversible atrophy, sustained significant trauma, or have been sacrificed during oncologic resection.


2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 1711-1713
Author(s):  
P.R. Sharma ◽  
A. Rosich-Medina ◽  
M.C. Swan ◽  
P.H. Gillespie ◽  
J.N. Skepper ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document