scholarly journals Biomarker‐driven phenotyping in Parkinson's disease: A translational missing link in disease‐modifying clinical trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto J. Espay ◽  
Michael A. Schwarzschild ◽  
Caroline M. Tanner ◽  
Hubert H. Fernandez ◽  
David K. Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Missing Link ◽  
Disease Modifying

scholarly journals A Preclinical Systematic Review of Ginsenoside-Rg1 in Experimental Parkinson’s Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Song ◽  
Meng-Bei Xu ◽  
Xiao-Li Zhou ◽  
Dao-pei Zhang ◽  
Shu-ling Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Quality Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Rotarod Test ◽  
Neuroprotective Effects ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Antioxidant Stress ◽  
Th Mrna

To date, no drug has been proven to be neuroprotective or disease-modifying for Parkinson’s disease (PD) in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to assess preclinical evidence of Ginsenosides-Rg1 (G-Rg1), a potential neuroprotectant, for experimental PD and its possible mechanisms. Eligible studies were identified by searching six electronic databases from their inception to August 2016. Twenty-five eligible studies involving 516 animals were identified. The quality score of these studies ranged from 3 to 7. Compared with the control group, two out of the 12 studies of MPTP-induced PD showed significant effects of G-Rg1 for improving the rotarod test (P<0.01), two studies for improving the swim-score values (P<0.01), six studies for improving the level of TH protein expression (P<0.01), and two studies for increasing the expression of TH mRNA in the substantia nigra of mice (P<0.01). The studies reported that G-Rg1 exerted potential neuroprotective effects on PD model through different mechanisms as antineuroinflammatory activities (n=10), antioxidant stress (n=3), and antiapoptosis (n=11). In conclusion, G-Rg1 exerted potential neuroprotective functions against PD largely by antineuroinflammatory, antioxidative, and antiapoptotic effects. G-Rg1 as a promising neuroprotectant for PD needs further confirmation by clinical trials.

scholarly journals Emulated Clinical Trials from Longitudinal Real-World Data Efficiently Identify Candidates for Neurological Disease Modification: Examples from Parkinson’s Disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphna Laifenfeld ◽  
Chen Yanover ◽  
Michal Ozery-Flato ◽  
Oded Shaham ◽  
Michal Rozen-Zvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data ◽  
Healthcare Data ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Disease Modifying

AbstractReal-world healthcare data hold the potential to identify therapeutic solutions for progressive diseases by efficiently pinpointing safe and efficacious repurposing drug candidates. This approach circumvents key early clinical development challenges, particularly relevant for neurological diseases, concordant with the vision of the 21stCentury Cures Act. However, to-date, these data have been utilized mainly for confirmatory purposes rather than as drug discovery engines. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of real-world data in identifying drug repurposing candidates for disease-modifying effects, specifically candidate marketed drugs that exhibit beneficial effects on Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression. We performed an observational study in cohorts of ascertained PD patients extracted from two large medical databases, Explorys SuperMart (N=88,867) and IBM MarketScan Research Databases (N=106,395); and applied two conceptually different, well-established causal inference methods to estimate the effect of hundreds of drugs on delaying dementia onset as a proxy for slowing PD progression. Using this approach, we identified two drugs that manifested significant beneficial effects on PD progression in both datasets: rasagiline, narrowly indicated for PD motor symptoms; and zolpidem, a psycholeptic. Each confers its effects through distinct mechanisms, which we explored via a comparison of estimated effects within the drug classification ontology. We conclude that analysis of observational healthcare data, emulating otherwise costly, large, and lengthy clinical trials, can highlight promising repurposing candidates, to be validated in prospective registration trials, for common, late-onset progressive diseases for which disease-modifying therapeutic solutions are scarce.

Promising disease-modifying therapies for Parkinson’s disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (520) ◽  
pp. eaba1659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valina L. Dawson ◽  
Ted M. Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
New Agents ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapy ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapies ◽  
Disease Modifying

To date, there is no disease-modifying therapy for Parkinson’s disease; however, promising new agents have advanced into clinical trials.

scholarly journals Emulated Clinical Trials from Longitudinal Real-World Data Efficiently Identify Candidates for Neurological Disease Modification: Examples from Parkinson’s Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphna Laifenfeld ◽  
Chen Yanover ◽  
Michal Ozery-Flato ◽  
Oded Shaham ◽  
Michal Rosen-Zvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data ◽  
Healthcare Data ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Disease Modifying

Real-world healthcare data hold the potential to identify therapeutic solutions for progressive diseases by efficiently pinpointing safe and efficacious repurposing drug candidates. This approach circumvents key early clinical development challenges, particularly relevant for neurological diseases, concordant with the vision of the 21st Century Cures Act. However, to-date, these data have been utilized mainly for confirmatory purposes rather than as drug discovery engines. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of real-world data in identifying drug repurposing candidates for disease-modifying effects, specifically candidate marketed drugs that exhibit beneficial effects on Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression. We performed an observational study in cohorts of ascertained PD patients extracted from two large medical databases, Explorys SuperMart (N = 88,867) and IBM MarketScan Research Databases (N = 106,395); and applied two conceptually different, well-established causal inference methods to estimate the effect of hundreds of drugs on delaying dementia onset as a proxy for slowing PD progression. Using this approach, we identified two drugs that manifested significant beneficial effects on PD progression in both datasets: rasagiline, narrowly indicated for PD motor symptoms; and zolpidem, a psycholeptic. Each confers its effects through distinct mechanisms, which we explored via a comparison of estimated effects within the drug classification ontology. We conclude that analysis of observational healthcare data, emulating otherwise costly, large, and lengthy clinical trials, can highlight promising repurposing candidates, to be validated in prospective registration trials, beneficial against common, late-onset progressive diseases for which disease-modifying therapeutic solutions are scarce.

scholarly journals Disease modifying treatment trials in Parkinson’s disease: how to balance expectations and interests of patients, physicians and industry partners?

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Berg ◽  
K. Eggert ◽  
B. Haslinger ◽  
J. Kassubek ◽  
B. Mollenhauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Great Expectations ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
New Treatments ◽  
Disease Modifying Treatment

Abstract Background The advent of therapeutic strategies designed to modify the disease course in Parkinson’s disease has raised great expectations in the currently conducted clinical trials. However, we see ethical challenges in the cooperation of industry and clinical partners, specifically evident in the way recruitment is performed. We here discuss the different positions and challenges of all involved to set the stage for a study and recruitment culture taking into account the expectations of all: (i) patients and their caregivers, ready to take the considerable burden of clinical trials in hope for the development of disease-modifying treatments; (ii) physicians and study nurses, obligated to the patients’ well-being and benefit who accompany and supervise patients closely as basis for the performance of elaborate clinical trials (iii) industrial partners, investing years of efforts and finances to develop new treatments. Conclusions We conclude that the current competitive race for enrollment in clinical studies in PD is challenging the primary goal to ensure patients’ benefit and formulate requests to the industrial partners to encounter these concerns.

scholarly journals Exenatide once weekly over 2 years as a potential disease-modifying treatment for Parkinson’s disease: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial: The ‘Exenatide-PD3’ study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e047993
Author(s):  
Nirosen Vijiaratnam ◽  
Christine Girges ◽  
Grace Auld ◽  
Marisa Chau ◽  
Kate Maclagan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Link Type ◽  
South Central ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

IntroductionParkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder with substantial morbidity. No disease-modifying treatments currently exist. The glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide has been associated in single-centre studies with reduced motor deterioration over 1 year. The aim of this multicentre UK trial is to confirm whether these previous positive results are maintained in a larger number of participants over 2 years and if effects accumulate with prolonged drug exposure.Methods and analysisThis is a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of exenatide at a dose of 2 mg weekly in 200 participants with mild to moderate PD. Treatment duration is 96 weeks. Randomisation is 1:1, drug to placebo. Assessments are performed at baseline, week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96 weeks.The primary outcome is the comparison of Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part 3 motor subscore in the practically defined OFF medication state at 96 weeks between participants according to treatment allocation. Secondary outcomes will compare the change between groups among other motor, non-motor and cognitive scores. The primary outcome will be reported using descriptive statistics and comparisons between treatment groups using a mixed model, adjusting for baseline scores. Secondary outcomes will be summarised between treatment groups using summary statistics and appropriate statistical tests to assess for significant differences.Ethics and disseminationThis trial has been approved by the South Central-Berkshire Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific meetings and to patients in lay-summary format.Trial registration numbersNCT04232969, ISRCTN14552789.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document