Impact of tool profile on mechanical behavior and material flow in friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminum alloys

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 725-731
Author(s):  
O.P. Abolusoro ◽  
E.T. Akinlabi ◽  
S.V. Kailas
Keyword(s):  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Mechanical Behavior ◽  
Material Flow ◽  
Friction Stir ◽  
Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Tool Profile

scholarly journals Investigation into the Dissimilar Friction Stir Welding of AA5052 and AA6061 Aluminum Alloys Using Pin-Eccentric Stir Tool

Metals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Chen ◽  
He Wang ◽  
Huaying Li ◽  
Xiaoyu Wang ◽  
Hua Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Material Flow ◽  
Tensile Tests ◽  
Friction Stir ◽  
Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Dissimilar Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Average Grain Size ◽  
Dislocation Strengthening ◽  
Onion Ring

Friction stir welding with different pin-eccentric stir tools (the pin eccentricities were 0, 0.4, and 0.8 mm, respectively) was successfully utilized for joining dissimilar aluminum alloys AA5052 and AA6061, and the influences of pin eccentricity on the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of joints were investigated. The results showed that sound joints could be obtained by placing the hard AA6061 in the advancing side, while the welding heat input led to both the coarsening of strengthening precipitates and dynamic recrystallization and softening of the nugget zone (NZ). The application of pin eccentricity promoted the material flow in the NZ and enlarged the area of the “onion ring”. Furthermore, the average grain size and fraction of recrystallized grain in the NZ decreased as the pin eccentricity increased. All joints failed in the NZ during tensile tests, and the joint produced by the 0.8 mm-pin-eccentric stir tool performed the highest tensile strength due to the enhanced grain-boundary and dislocation strengthening.

Microstructural Characterization and Temperature Analysis in Friction Stir Welding of A383/5052 Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys

2007 ◽  
Vol 561-565 ◽  
pp. 279-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masafumi Kokubo ◽  
Shinichi Kazui ◽  
Takao Kaneuchi ◽  
Yoshimasa Takayama ◽  
Hajime Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
Heat Generation ◽  
Microstructural Characterization ◽  
Joint Line ◽  
Experimental Temperature ◽  
Temperature Analysis ◽  
Friction Stir ◽  
Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys

Microstructural characterization and temperature analysis have been performed in friction stir welding (FSW) of A383 and 5052 dissimilar aluminum alloys. Marked difference in microstructure was observed between joints with different arrangements of materials. The temperature at four points on each side of the joint line was measured during FSW in various conditions. In addition, an analytical model assumed that the work generated by the rotation of the tool led to the work for stirring materials and heat generation of the material and the tool. The temperature of the retreating side (RS) for the joint of the advancing side (AS):A383/RS:5052 was about 50K higher than that of AS, while the temperatures of AS and RS for the joint of AS:5052/RS:A383 were almost the same. The experimental temperature could be calculated reasonably by using the model with assumption of the work for stirring the material.

Evaluation of dissimilar joints properties of 5083-H12 and 6061-T6 aluminum alloys produced by tungsten inert gas and friction stir welding

2015 ◽  
Vol 231 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Ghaffarpour ◽  
Mohammad Kazemi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Mohammadi Sefat ◽  
Ahmad Aziz ◽  
Kamran Dehghani
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Traverse Speed ◽  
Inert Gas ◽  
Dissimilar Joints ◽  
Friction Stir ◽  
Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Welding Processes

In the present study, friction stir welding (FSW) and tungsten inert gas (TIG) techniques were used to join the dissimilar aluminum alloys of 5083-H12 and 6061-T6. The laboratory tests were designed using design of experiment (DOE) method. Variables for the FSW process were the rotational speed, traverse speed, shoulder diameter, and pin diameter. They changed in ranges of 700–2500 r/min, 25–400 mm/min, 10–14 mm, and 2–4 mm, respectively. In the case of TIG process, the variables were current intensity, traverse speed, and tilt angle. These parameters varied from 80 to 90 A, 200 to 400 mm/min, and 3° to 12°, respectively. The optimum amounts of parameters were obtained using response surface methodology (RSM). The RSM-based model was developed to predict ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the welds produced. In FSW, the difference between predicted and measured UTS was about 1.28% and in TIG it was 1.78%. The good agreement between experimental and predicted results indicates the high accuracy of the developed model. Mechanical properties and also the microstructure of the welds were compared after optimizing both welding processes using RSM. The results showed that the welds produced by FSW indicated a considerably higher quality and also improved mechanical properties compared to TIG. Properties of the joints obtained by FSW in single-sided joints were more desirable. In the double-sided welds obtained by FSW these differences were of an even higher significance.

A Numerical Simulation for Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys Joined by Friction Stir Welding

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 4519-4529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carter Hamilton ◽  
Mateusz Kopyściański ◽  
Aleksandra Węglowska ◽  
Stanisław Dymek ◽  
Adam Pietras
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Friction Stir ◽  
Dissimilar Aluminum Alloys
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document