The simultaneous sponsorship of rival teams: Beyond ingroup favoritism and outgroup animosity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen Bee ◽  
Vassilis Dalakas ◽  
Johnny Chen
Keyword(s):  
Ingroup Favoritism

Communication breeds ingroup favoritism

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Gustafsson ◽  
Sverker Sikstrom ◽  
Torun Lindholm
Keyword(s):  
Ingroup Favoritism

scholarly journals Investigating the Evolution of Ingroup Favoritism Using a Minimal Group Interaction Paradigm: The Effects of Inter- and Intragroup Interdependence

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e0165974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Durrheim ◽  
Michael Quayle ◽  
Colin G. Tredoux ◽  
Kim Titlestad ◽  
Larry Tooke
Keyword(s):  
Group Interaction ◽  
Minimal Group ◽  
Ingroup Favoritism

scholarly journals The role of the group type and the characteristics of self-attitude in students’ social perception

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-69
Author(s):  
M.V. Baleva
Keyword(s):  
Social Perception ◽  
Social Groups ◽  
Social Perceptions ◽  
Group Type ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Mediating Factor ◽  
Self Acceptance ◽  
Ingroup Favoritism

The article deals with the problem of disparate studies in social perceptions of different types of groups, which impede the understanding of its fundamental mechanisms. Different types of social groups appear in the research as stimulus descriptions of their artificial analogues, singled out according to ethnic, ideological and stratification criteria. As a mediating factor of social perception, the features of subject’s self-attitude (self-acceptance and self-rejection) are considered. The study involved 307 females and 109 males from 17 to 22 years old (M = 18.92, SD = 0.93). It was found that perceiving of different types of social groups determines the varying degrees of stereotyping and bias intensity. Both of these phenomena are most observable for the groups identified by stratification criterion. Ingroup favoritism is also more conspicuous for the subject’s “ideological” ingroup in comparison with the groups of different types. It was also shown that self-attitude plays a facilitating role in the manifestations of ingroup favoritism: both self-acceptance and self-rejection contribute to the growth of perceptional bias, but do not “participate” in outgroup stereotyping.

The Contribution of Face Familiarity to Ingroup Favoritism and Stereotyping

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Zebrowitz ◽  
P. Matthew Bronstad ◽  
Hoon Koo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Ingroup Favoritism

What Drives Ethnic Homophily? A Relational Approach on How Ethnic Identification Moderates Preferences for Same-Ethnic Friends

2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 394-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Leszczensky ◽  
Sebastian Pink
Keyword(s):  
Panel Data ◽  
Social Identity ◽  
Ethnic Identification ◽  
Friendship Networks ◽  
Relational Approach ◽  
Individual Preferences ◽  
School Based ◽  
Ingroup Identification ◽  
Ingroup Favoritism

Individual preferences for same-ethnic friends contribute to persistent segregation of adolescents’ friendship networks. Yet, we know surprisingly little about the mechanisms behind ethnic homophily. Prior research suggests that ethnic homophily is ubiquitous, but a social identity perspective indicates that strong ingroup identification drives ingroup favoritism. Combining a social identity perspective with a relational approach, we ask whether the presumed increased homophily of high identifiers extends to all ingroup members, or whether it is conditional on the strength of same-ethnics’ identification. We propose that the strength of ethnic identification affects not only how much individuals desire same-ethnic friends, but also how attractive they are as potential friends to others. Fitting stochastic actor-oriented models to German adolescent school-based network panel data, we find that ethnic homophily is driven by an interplay of peers’ ethnic identification: high identifiers befriend same-ethnic peers who share their strong ethnic identification, while excluding same-ethnic low identifiers. Low identifiers, in turn, tend to avoid befriending inter-ethnic high identifiers. Our relational approach reveals that ethnic homophily is hardly ubiquitous but requires strong identification of both parties of a (potential) friendship.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document