The Impact of Attribute Importance in the Effects of Option Framing on Choice: Budget Range and Justification as Moderators of Loss Aversion

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 726-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
SEHOON PARK ◽  
MOON-YONG KIM
Keyword(s):  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Attribute Importance ◽  
The Impact

Market Reactions to a High-Quality Auditor and Managerial Preference for Audit Quality

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 131-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Hurley ◽  
Brian W. Mayhew
Keyword(s):  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Quality Competition ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Market Reactions ◽  
Comprehensive Theory ◽  
Audit Reports ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Quality Theory

SUMMARY We insert an automated high-quality (HQ) auditor into established experimental audit markets to test the impact of high-quality competition on other auditors' supply of and managers' demand for audit quality. Theory predicts that managers will demand high levels of audit quality to avoid investors' price-protecting behavior. This demand should result in the HQ auditor dominating the market and increase other auditors' audit quality provision to compete with the HQ auditor. However, we find that the HQ auditor does not dominate the market—despite holding audit costs constant and investors placing a premium on HQ auditor reports. We also find that adding an HQ auditor results in other auditors lowering audit quality. Additional analyses indicate some managers demand lower audit quality to avoid negative audit reports, consistent with loss aversion as a potential explanation. Our findings indicate a need to develop a more comprehensive theory of the demand for auditing. Data Availability: The laboratory market data used in this study are available from the authors upon request.

Frustrated Customers: The Effect of Unexpected Emotional Cues on Yelp Reviews

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Josh Matti
Keyword(s):  
Loss Aversion ◽  
National Basketball Association ◽  
Emotional Cues ◽  
Consumer Services ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Phoenix ◽  
Reference Dependent Preferences

This paper explores how emotional cues from unexpected sports outcomes impact consumers’ perception of their experience at local businesses. Using nearly 1 million Yelp reviews from the Phoenix area, I empirically test for the presence of loss aversion and reference-dependent preferences in reviewer behavior. Consistent with loss aversion, unexpected losses lead to worse reviews while there is no effect for unexpected wins. The impact of unexpected losses is concentrated in home games, with no effect for away games. The results also reflect reference-dependent preferences since wins and losses in games predicted to be close do not impact reviewer behavior. Consumer services that cater to National Basketball Association fans (e.g., sports bars) experience pronounced effects.

scholarly journals Loss aversion, overconfidence of investors and their impact on market performance evidence from the US stock markets

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (50) ◽  
pp. 451-478
Author(s):  
Ahmed Bouteska ◽  
Boutheina Regaieg
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Market Performance ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Service Firms ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The current study aims to investigate the impacts of two behavioral biases, namely, loss aversion and overconfidence on the performance of US companies. First, the impact of loss aversion on the economic performance of companies was assessed. Second, the impact of overconfidence on market performance was discussed. Design/methodology/approach This study used around 6,777 quarterly observations on the population of US-insured industrial and services companies over the 2006-2016 period. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression in two panel data models were used to test the hypotheses formulated for the study. Findings It was documented that the loss-aversion bias negatively affects the economic performance of companies and this is achieved for both sectors. In contrast, the findings suggest that overconfidence positively affects market performance of industrial firms but negatively affects market performance in service firms. Further robust evidence was found that overconfidence bias seems to be dominant, and hence, investors may tend to be more overconfident rather than more loss-averse. Originality/value This research can be extended by focusing on the following question: What is the impact of the contradictory (positive and negative) effects of an investor's loss aversion and overconfidence on the US company performance in case of realization of a stock market crisis or stock market crash?

scholarly journals The Impact of Corporate Performance on Mental Accounting and Loss Aversion in Financial Decisions

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 259
Author(s):  
Mona Hassabelrasoul Mohammad ◽  
Dalal Mohamed Ebrahim Mohamed ◽  
Elsaid Abd Elazim Tolba Elsharkawi
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Real Estate ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Mental Accounting ◽  
Organization Performance ◽  
Financial Decisions ◽  
Real Estate Company ◽  
The Impact

This study investigates the effect of the organization performance on two psychological biases, mental accounting and aversion to loss, on financial decisions to both investors and managers. To achieve this, two experiments are conducted. The first experiment consists of 40 graduate students as investors, while the second one consists of 40 accountants in a real estate company as managers. The results of the study indicate that the performance of companies impacts both mental accounting and aversion to loss of investors, whereas the performance of companies affects the mental accounting of managers in making their financial decisions but does not affect the aversion to loss.

The Impact of Consumer Loss Aversion on Returns Policies and Supply Chain Coordination

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulay Samatli-Pac ◽  
Wenjing Shen ◽  
Xinxin Hu
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Expected Profit ◽  
Lower Price ◽  
Optimal Pricing ◽  
Optimal Price ◽  
Product Return ◽  
Returns Policy ◽  
The Impact

Product return is a common after-sale service. Existing literature has assumed loss neutral consumers, while in practice consumers are often more sensitive to utility losses than gains, i.e., customers are often loss averse. In this paper, we study the impact of such loss aversion on the retailer's optimal pricing and returns policies. We analyze three scenarios where the seller offers no refund, full refund and partial refund for the returned products. Under each scenario, the seller determines the optimal price, quantity, and refund amount (under partial refund case) in order to maximize the expected profit. Our results demonstrate that consumer loss aversion leads a no-refund retailer to charge lower price and order smaller quantity, has no impact on a full-refund retailer, and results in a more lenient returns policy for a partial-refund retailer. We also find contracts that coordinate supply chains selling to loss averse consumers. Therefore, this article sheds some lights on how the management of returns policies should be adapted when consumers are loss averse.

scholarly journals 2252. Patient Preferences for Triazole Antifungals in the Treatment of Invasive Mold Infection: A Discrete Choice Experiment

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S770-S771
Author(s):  
Hardik Bhagat ◽  
Yanqing Xu ◽  
James Spalding ◽  
Yan Song ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Preferences ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Route Of Administration ◽  
Treatment Preference ◽  
Attribute Importance ◽  
Attribute Levels ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Invasive mold infections (IMIs) are an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.1 Pharmacological differences among the currently available mold-active triazoles make treatment selection complex.1 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess patient preferences for mold-active triazoles in IMI treatment. Methods Patients were included if they were aged ≥ 18 years with investigator-confirmed invasive aspergillosis or invasive mucormycosis; had received voriconazole, isavuconazonium sulfate or posaconazole within ≤ 1 week previously; and were outpatients for ≥ 3 weeks. Participants were presented with 14 choice cards, each with two hypothetical treatments with varying levels of attributes, and asked to select their preferred treatment. Preference weights for attribute levels were analyzed using conditional logit regression and used to calculate the impact of changes in attribute levels on patient choices; relative attribute importance (RAI); and patient willingness to pay (WTP; monthly out-of-pocket cost) for an attribute improvement. Results Of 50 participants, 52% were female and the mean age was 47.3 years; 40%, 40%, and 28% had used posaconazole, voriconazole and isavuconazonium sulfate, respectively (Figure 1). Route of administration (27% RAI), treatment duration (22% RAI), and chance of symptom relief after treatment (20% RAI) were the most important attributes for patients (Figure 2). The odds ratios for patients choosing oral suspension or tablets/capsules over IV infusion were 5.6 and 4.5, respectively (P < 0.001) (Figure 3); patients were willing to pay an additional $205/month or $180/month out of pocket for these respective routes of administration over IV (Figure 4). The odds ratio for patients choosing a 30-day over a 90-day treatment were 4.1 (P < 0.001) (Figure 3); this decrease in duration was valued by patients at $168/month (Figure 4). For a 50% vs. 30% chance of symptom relief, the odds ratio was 3.5 (P < 0.001) (Figure 3) and WTP was $147.89/month (Figure 4). Conclusion Patients considered route of administration, treatment duration and chance of symptom relief to be the most important IMI treatment attributes among mold-active triazoles. 1Jenks JD et al. (2019) Med Mycol 57:S168–S178 Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Loss Aversion and Market Liquidity in the Real Estate Market

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-249
Author(s):  
Sun Young Park
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Real Estate Market ◽  
Commercial Real Estate ◽  
Market Liquidity ◽  
The Real Estate ◽  
The Real Estate Market ◽  
Expectation Hypothesis ◽  
Property Sales ◽  
The Impact

The most commonly observed risk averse behavior in the commercial real estate market is loss aversion on the part of investors; i.e., investors are more sensitive to prospective losses than to prospective gains. This observation leads to the natural question : Does the market rationally anticipate investors' loss aversion? If not, then does loss aversion become stronger in a relatively illiquid market? The answer to these questions provides strategically important implications to institutional investors. We propose to explore the impact of loss aversion on the commercial real estate market by testing two competing hypotheses : (1) the rational market expectation hypothesis and (2) the liquidity spiral hypothesis. The rational market expectation hypothesis holds that the market rationally anticipates investors' behavioral loss aversion. As a result, the interaction between lagged market liquidity and loss aversion does not have an impact on the probability of property sales. On the other hand, the liquidity spiral hypothesis holds that the interaction between market liquidity and loss aversion has an impact on the probability of property sales due to the self-fulfilling feedback effect between loss aversion and market liquidity. In the context of REITs' property transactions, we find partial evidence for the liquidity spiral hypothesis : private market liquidity and stock market liquidity each has an additional impact on the sale probability of property.

Herding and loss aversion in stock markets: mediating role of fear of missing out (FOMO) in retail investors

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpi Gupta ◽  
Monica Shrivastava
Keyword(s):  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Herd Behavior ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fear Of Missing Out ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Retail Investors ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe study aims to understand the impact of loss aversion and herding on investment decision of retail investors. The study further evaluates the mediating role of fear of missing out (FOMO) in retail investors on these relationships.Design/methodology/approachThe study employed questionnaire survey to collect data from retail investors of Indian stock market. Total 323 data were collected. The collected data were examined using SmartPLS. Factor analysis and partial least square structural equation modeling were employed for fulfilling the objectives of the study.FindingsThe results of the study revealed that investment decisions of retail investors are significantly influenced by loss aversion, herd behavior as well as FOMO. Assessing the impact of herd behavior and loss aversion on investment decision in presence and absence of FOMO exposed that FOMO partially mediates these relations. The mediation was complementary in nature as the presence of FOMO increased the influence of loss aversion and herd behavior on retail investor's investment decisions.Practical implicationsBehavioral predispositions are accountable for numerous irregularities in stock markets. Thus, it is quite substantial to realize the stimulus of these partialities on investment decisions. The outcomes of this study would help financial planners and investors to keep in mind the different ways their decision outcomes could be biased and try to ignore them.Originality/valueThough there have been many studies conducted on behavioral biases and their impact on investment decisions, there are very few studies that have taken into account the FOMO factor in investment, in context of the behavioral biases. Theoretically, FOMO has been linked with herd behavior and greed of earning more, but there are very few empirical supports to this fact. Thus, this study is an attempt to fill this gap by examining the role of FOMO on investment decisions and the different biases associated with it.

Behavioral Aspects of Commodity Markets

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Nofsinger
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Futures Markets ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
The Public ◽  
Behavioral Biases ◽  
Market Makers ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
Momentum Investing ◽  
The Impact

Are behavioral biases prevalent in commodities and futures markets? Although retail equity investors display many psychological biases, investors who are more sophisticated exhibit fewer biases. The market makers, traders (locals), speculators, hedgers, and institutions of the commodities and futures markets tend to be professional participants, and thus less prone to behavioral biases. Nevertheless, the fast-paced action of these markets is an environment that fosters behavioral errors. This chapter reviews the literature on the pervasiveness of prospect theory behavior and other biases in these markets. Strong evidence indicates that market participants exhibit loss aversion, the impact of reference points, the disposition effect, and overconfidence. They also engage in positive feedback trading and momentum investing. Lastly, the chapter reviews risk-taking and behavioral biases by the type of market participant, particularly focusing on market makers, floor traders, clearing members, and the public.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document