Lattice BCK logics with Modus Ponens as unique rule

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-238
Author(s):  
Joan Gispert ◽  
Antoni Torrens
Keyword(s):  
Modus Ponens ◽  
Unique Rule

Hilbert-style proof Calculus for Propositional Logic in ABC notation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Pereira Lobo
Keyword(s):  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Inference Rule ◽  
Modus Ponens ◽  
Axiomatic System ◽  
First Contact

All nine axioms and a single inference rule of logic (Modus Ponens) within the Hilbert axiomatic system are presented using capital letters (ABC) in order to familiarize the beginner student in hers/his first contact with the topic.

Pythagorean fuzzy full implication multiple I method and corresponding applications

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
TaiBen Nan ◽  
Haidong Zhang ◽  
Yanping He
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Modus Ponens ◽  
Pythagorean Fuzzy Set ◽  
Implication Operator ◽  
Continuity Properties ◽  
Fuzzy Implication ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Fuzzy Implication Operator ◽  
Degree Of Similarity ◽  
Fuzzy Modus Ponens

The overwhelming majority of existing decision-making methods combined with the Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS) are based on aggregation operators, and their logical foundation is imperfect. Therefore, we attempt to establish two decision-making methods based on the Pythagorean fuzzy multiple I method. This paper is devoted to the discussion of the full implication multiple I method based on the PFS. We first propose the concepts of Pythagorean t-norm, Pythagorean t-conorm, residual Pythagorean fuzzy implication operator (RPFIO), Pythagorean fuzzy biresiduum, and the degree of similarity between PFSs based on the Pythagorean fuzzy biresiduum. In addition, the full implication multiple I method for Pythagorean fuzzy modus ponens (PFMP) is established, and the reversibility and continuity properties of the full implication multiple I method of PFMP are analyzed. Finally, a practical problem is discussed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the Pythagorean fuzzy full implication multiple I method in a decision-making problem. The advantages of the new method over existing methods are also explained. Overall, the proposed methods are based on logical reasoning, so they can more accurately and completely express decision information.

scholarly journals On Basic Probability Logic Inequalities

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1409
Author(s):  
Marija Boričić Joksimović
Keyword(s):  
Probability Theory ◽  
Inference Rule ◽  
Modus Ponens ◽  
Probability Logic ◽  
Modus Tollens ◽  
Short Overview ◽  
Basic Probability ◽  
Probabilistic Version ◽  
Hypothetical Syllogism

We give some simple examples of applying some of the well-known elementary probability theory inequalities and properties in the field of logical argumentation. A probabilistic version of the hypothetical syllogism inference rule is as follows: if propositions A, B, C, A→B, and B→C have probabilities a, b, c, r, and s, respectively, then for probability p of A→C, we have f(a,b,c,r,s)≤p≤g(a,b,c,r,s), for some functions f and g of given parameters. In this paper, after a short overview of known rules related to conjunction and disjunction, we proposed some probabilized forms of the hypothetical syllogism inference rule, with the best possible bounds for the probability of conclusion, covering simultaneously the probabilistic versions of both modus ponens and modus tollens rules, as already considered by Suppes, Hailperin, and Wagner.

The sentential calculus using rule of inference Re

1960 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Angell
Keyword(s):  
Modus Ponens ◽  
Sentential Calculus

Axiomatizations of the sentential calculus which use Rmp (modus ponens), have been shown equivalent to axiomatizations similar in all respects except that Rmp is replaced by the less restricted rule Re (rule of excision)1:Re. If S and (…(S⊃S') …), then (… S' …).

Post completeness in modal logic

1972 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krister Segerberg
Keyword(s):  
Modal Logic ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Modus Ponens ◽  
Proper Subset ◽  
Proper Extension ◽  
Image Position

Let ⊥, →, and □ be primitive, and let us have a countable supply of propositional letters. By a (modal) logic we understand a proper subset of the set of all formulas containing every tautology and being closed under modus ponens and substitution. A logic is regular if it contains every instance of □A ∧ □B ↔ □(A ∧ B) and is closed under the ruleA regular logic is normal if it contains □⊤. The smallest regular logic we denote by C (the same as Lemmon's C2), the smallest normal one by K. If L and L' are logics and L ⊆ L′, then L is a sublogic of L', and L' is an extension of L; properly so if L ≠ L'. A logic is quasi-regular (respectively, quasi-normal) if it is an extension of C (respectively, K).A logic is Post complete if it has no proper extension. The Post number, denoted by p(L), is the number of Post complete extensions of L. Thanks to Lindenbaum, we know thatThere is an obvious upper bound, too:Furthermore,.

Modus Ponens property of T-power based implications

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Huang Li ◽  
Feng Qin ◽  
Ai-Fang Xie
Keyword(s):  
Modus Ponens

Uninorm based residual implications satisfying the Modus Ponens property with respect to a uninorm

2019 ◽  
Vol 359 ◽  
pp. 22-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Mas ◽  
Daniel Ruiz-Aguilera ◽  
Joan Torrens
Keyword(s):  
Modus Ponens

scholarly journals Thought Experiment Analyses of René Descartes' Cogito

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 9-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Hertogh
Keyword(s):  
Thought Experiment ◽  
Rene Descartes ◽  
Modus Ponens ◽  
New Science ◽  
Modern Age ◽  
René Descartes ◽  
Human Kind

ABSTRACT: René Descartes' Cogito is an example of a paradigmatic thought experiment, herald of both subjectivism and new science in Europe's Modern Age, that seems to have escaped the attention of thought experiment philosophers. On deep analysis, the Cogito appears as universal instantiation (or modus ponens with implicit major 'whatever has the property of thinking, exists'). The Cogito has strong rhetorical effects for it narratively generalizes from I to all human kind, and its historical and philosophical success can be explained from its concise enthymematic structure that rings true in many possible senses. We consider it a preeminent example of a thought experiment as it states the power of thinking as its very contents. From Descartes' methodology of doubt we can conclude that, e.g., on a Wittgensteinian interpretation, the Cogito is a logical thought experiment rather than a psychological one.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document