Integrating Specialist Palliative Care in the Liver Transplant Evaluation Process: A Qualitative Analysis of Hepatologist and Palliative Care Provider Views

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrick C. Shinall ◽  
Kemberlee Bonnet ◽  
David Schlundt ◽  
Manisha Verma
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Transplant Evaluation

Patient Experience with Integrated Palliative Care Consult in Lung Transplant Evaluation Process

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. S117
Author(s):  
Alexandria Robbins ◽  
Todd Rockwood ◽  
Gregory Beilman ◽  
Nicholas Lemke ◽  
Jagadish Patil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Lung Transplant ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Transplant Evaluation

scholarly journals What makes palliative care needs “complex”? A multisite sequential explanatory mixed methods study of patients referred for specialist palliative care

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Finucane ◽  
Connie Swenson ◽  
John I. MacArtney ◽  
Rachel Perry ◽  
Hazel Lamberton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Psychological Needs ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Complex Needs ◽  
Sequential Explanatory ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

Abstract Background Specialist palliative care (SPC) providers tend to use the term ‘complex’ to refer to the needs of patients who require SPC. However, little is known about complex needs on first referral to a SPC service. We examined which needs are present and sought the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the complexity of need on referral to a hospice service. Methods Multi-site sequential explanatory mixed method study consisting of a case-note review and focus groups with healthcare professionals in four UK hospices. Results Documentation relating to 239 new patient referrals to hospice was reviewed; and focus groups involving 22 healthcare professionals conducted. Most patients had two or more needs documented on referral (96%); and needs were recorded across two or more domains for 62%. Physical needs were recorded for 91% of patients; psychological needs were recorded for 59%. Spiritual needs were rarely documented. Referral forms were considered limited for capturing complex needs. Referrals were perceived to be influenced by the experience and confidence of the referrer and the local resource available to meet palliative care needs directly. Conclusions Complexity was hard to detail or to objectively define on referral documentation alone. It appeared to be a term used to describe patients whom primary or secondary care providers felt needed SPC knowledge or support to meet their needs. Hospices need to provide greater clarity regarding who should be referred, when and for what purpose. Education and training in palliative care for primary care nurses and doctors and hospital clinicians could reduce the need for referral and help ensure that hospices are available to those most in need of SPC input.

scholarly journals 2 Tunnelled peritoneal catheters for recurrent ascites in a specialist palliative care unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsty Thorpe ◽  
Jamie McKnight ◽  
Hildegard Kolb ◽  
Claire McCullough ◽  
Tim Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care

scholarly journals 77 National Audit of Care At the End of Life (NACEL)—Round Two Findings

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
D Hibbert
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Experience Of Care ◽  
Outcomes Of Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care Service ◽  
The Right

Abstract   NACEL is a national comparative audit of the quality and outcomes of care experienced by the dying person and those important to them during the final admission in acute and community hospitals in England and Wales. Mental health inpatient providers participated in the first round but excluded from the second round. NACEL round two, undertaken during 2019/20, comprised: Data was collected between June and October 2019. 175 trusts in England and 8 Welsh organisations took part in at least one element of NACEL (97% of eligible organisations). Key findings include Recognising the possibility of imminent death: The possibility that the patient may die was documented in 88% of cases. The median time from recognition of dying to death was 41 hours (36 hours in the first round). Individual plan of care: 71% of patients, where it had been recognised that the patient was dying (Category 1 deaths), had an individualised end of life care plan. Of the patients who did not have an individualised plan of care, in 45% of these cases, the time from recognition of dying to death was more than 24 hours. Families’ and others’ experience of care: 80% of Quality Survey respondents rated the quality of care delivered to the patient as outstanding/excellent/good and 75% rated the care provided to families/others as outstanding/excellent/good. However, one-fifth of responses reported that the families’/others’ needs were not asked about. Individual plan of care: 80% of Quality Survey respondents believed that hospital was the “right” place to die; however, 20% reported there was a lack of peace and privacy. Workforce Most hospitals (99%) have access to a specialist palliative care service. 36% of hospitals have a face-to-face specialist palliative care service (doctor and/or nurse) available 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. NACEL round three will start in 2021.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document