scholarly journals Split-liver transplants for two adult recipients: Technique of preservation of the vena cava with the right lobe graft

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhinav Humar ◽  
Khalid Khwaja ◽  
Timothy D. Sielaff ◽  
John R. Lake ◽  
William D. Payne
2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-564
Author(s):  
P JETHWA ◽  
T HAYES ◽  
J BUCKELS ◽  
A MAYER ◽  
D MIRZA ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 80-86
Author(s):  
Gen Tsujio ◽  
Kenjiro Kimura ◽  
Yukie Tauchi ◽  
Go Ohira ◽  
Ryosuke Amano ◽  
...  

Introduction: The anterior approach to the inferior vena cava (IVC) by the liver hanging maneuver is effective in resecting large retrohepatic tumors without mobilizing the right lobe. Case presentation: A 50-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. He had severe congestive heart failure and cardiac ejection fraction was 15%. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) showed an adrenal mass about 80 mm in diameter. The tumor-infiltrated posterior segment of the right hepatic lobe and tumor were widely attached to the IVC. After treatment of congestive heart failure with conservative therapy, surgery was planned. Right adrenectomy and right hepatectomy were performed, the latter using the liver hanging maneuver to avoid mobilizing the right lobe, and we were able to minimize blood pressure fluctuations and perform the operation safely. The histopathologic diagnosis was malignant pheochromocytoma. Conclusions: We performed right hepatectomy without mobilizing the right lobe by the liver hanging maneuver and minimized stimulation of the tumor. We could perform the operation safely using the liver hanging maneuver, which seems effective in such cases.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amadeo Marcos ◽  
John M. Ham ◽  
Robert A. Fisher ◽  
Ann T. Olzinski ◽  
Marc P. Posner

Medicina ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 694
Author(s):  
Saulius Rutkauskas ◽  
Vytautas Gedrimas ◽  
Tomas Čičinskas ◽  
Aurimas Savulis ◽  
Algidas Basevičius

Majority of interventional procedures are made at the porta hepatis, which has a different location on the visceral surface of the liver. Objective. To describe the location of the porta hepatis in respect of the borders of the visceral surface and separate lobes of the liver. Material and methods. Sixty-four human livers were obtained at autopsy (mean age, 45 years). We chose the point of the crossing of longitudinal and transversal lines of the porta hepatis, which was considered as center of the porta hepatis. The distances from the center of the porta hepatis to the border of the visceral surface every 10 degrees with protractor and ruler and the angles of anatomical structures were measured. Additionally, the borders of lobes were assessed. Results. We found that center of the porta hepatis is located approximately 11.6±2.8 cm from the border of the visceral liver surface. The location of center of the porta hepatis was 11.6±1.1 cm from the border of left lobe, 9.7±1.5 cm from the border of quadrate lobe, 12.3±1.2 cm from the border of right lobe, and 7.4±1.0 cm from the border of caudate lobe. All distances were statistically significant (P<0.05). An angle of the fissure for round ligament was 50.5°, of the fossa of gallbladder – 102°, of the groove of vena cava inferior – 266°, and of the fissure for ligamentum venosum – 293°. The borders of the right, left, quadrate, and caudate liver lobe covered 45.6%, 32.6%, 14.3%, and 7.5% of the perimeter of visceral surface border, respectively. Conclusions. The center of the porta hepatis can help to characterize precisely the position of the porta hepatis on the visceral surface of the liver.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Erdem Kinaci ◽  
Cuneyt Kayaalp ◽  
Sezai Yilmaz ◽  
Emrah Otan

Hepatic venous outflow obstruction following liver transplantation is rare but disastrous. Here we described a 14-year-old boy who underwent a split right lobe liver transplantation with modified (side-to-side) piggyback technique which resulted in hepatic venous outflow obstruction. When the liver graft was lifted up, the outflow drainage returned to normal but when it was placed back into the abdomen, the outflow obstruction recurred. Because reanastomosis would have resulted in hepatic reischemia, alternatively, a second infrahepatic cavocavostomy was planned without requiring hepatic reischemia. During this procedure, the first assistant hung the liver up to provide sufficient outflow and the portal inflow of the graft continued as well. We only clamped the recipient’s infrahepatic vena cava and the caudal cuff of the graft cava. After the second end-to-side cavocaval anastomosis, the graft was placed in its orthotopic position and there was no outflow problem anymore. The patient tolerated the procedure well and there were no problems after three months of follow-up. A second cavocavostomy can provide an extra bypass for some hepatic venous outflow problems after piggyback anastomosis by avoiding hepatic reischemia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Memeo ◽  
Nicola de'Angelis ◽  
Chady Salloum ◽  
Philipe Compagnon ◽  
Alexis Laurent ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document