scholarly journals Body size, trophic position, and the coupling of different energy pathways across a saltmarsh landscape

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich W. Keppeler ◽  
Jill A. Olin ◽  
Paola C. López‐Duarte ◽  
Michael J. Polito ◽  
Linda M. Hooper‐Bùi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Energy Pathways

Trophic position scales positively with body size within but not among four species of rocky reef predators

2020 ◽  
Vol 640 ◽  
pp. 189-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
AM Olson ◽  
A Frid ◽  
JBQ dos Santos ◽  
F Juanes
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Stomach Contents ◽  
Rocky Reef ◽  
Morphometric Traits ◽  
Predator Species ◽  
Predatory Fishes ◽  
Average Size ◽  
Interspecific Comparisons ◽  
Large Predators

Intra- and interspecifically, larger-bodied predators generally occupy higher trophic positions (TPs). With widespread declines in large predators, there is a need to understand their size-based trophic roles to predict ecosystem-level responses. In British Columbia, Canada, we examined size-based trophic interactions between predatory fishes—3 rockfish species (genus Sebastes) and lingcod Ophiodon elongatus—and their prey, converting predator δ15N signatures to TP and analyzing stomach contents. Intraspecifically, TP scaled positively with predator length and gape width, but the rates of change varied by species. Interspecifically, TP did not scale positively with the observed mean sizes or known maximum sizes of species. Lingcod TP was lower than that of yelloweye and quillback rockfishes, which were 51 and 37%, respectively, smaller than lingcod. Yellowtail rockfish had the smallest average size, yet their mean TP did not differ significantly from that of lingcod. Neither species differences in some morphometric traits known to influence body size-TP relationships nor phylogenetic history explained these results. Most prey consumed were <20% of the predator’s size, which might partially explain the lack of a size-based trophic hierarchy among species. Currently, large size classes of rockfishes are being lost due to fisheries and perhaps climate-driven changes. Our findings on intraspecific size-TP relationships indicate that fishery removals of large individuals may diminish trophic structures. Interspecific comparisons of TP suggest that, along with size, species remain an important factor in understanding trophic dynamics. In addition, smaller-bodied predator species may have significant ecological roles to be considered in ecosystem-based fisheries management.

scholarly journals The isotopic niche of Atlantic, biting marine mammals and its relationship to skull morphology and body size

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Drago ◽  
Marco Signaroli ◽  
Meica Valdivia ◽  
Enrique M. González ◽  
Asunción Borrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Atlantic Ocean ◽  
Fisheries Management ◽  
Marine Mammals ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Sympatric Species ◽  
Isotopic Niche ◽  
Apex Predators ◽  
Skull Morphology ◽  
Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management

AbstractUnderstanding the trophic niches of marine apex predators is necessary to understand interactions between species and to achieve sustainable, ecosystem-based fisheries management. Here, we review the stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios for biting marine mammals inhabiting the Atlantic Ocean to test the hypothesis that the relative position of each species within the isospace is rather invariant and that common and predictable patterns of resource partitioning exists because of constrains imposed by body size and skull morphology. Furthermore, we analyze in detail two species-rich communities to test the hypotheses that marine mammals are gape limited and that trophic position increases with gape size. The isotopic niches of species were highly consistent across regions and the topology of the community within the isospace was well conserved across the Atlantic Ocean. Furthermore, pinnipeds exhibited a much lower diversity of isotopic niches than odontocetes. Results also revealed body size as a poor predictor of the isotopic niche, a modest role of skull morphology in determining it, no evidence of gape limitation and little overlap in the isotopic niche of sympatric species. The overall evidence suggests limited trophic flexibility for most species and low ecological redundancy, which should be considered for ecosystem-based fisheries management.

scholarly journals Dispersal strategies of juvenile pike ( Esox lucius L.): Influences and consequences for body size, somatic growth and trophic position

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-383
Author(s):  
Marina J. Nyqvist ◽  
Julien Cucherousset ◽  
Rodolphe E. Gozlan ◽  
William R.C. Beaumont ◽  
J. Robert Britton
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Somatic Growth ◽  
Esox Lucius ◽  
Pike Esox Lucius

Ecophysiological determinants of the variation in 137Cs concentrations between and within lacustrine fish populations

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 2727-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Sundbom ◽  
Markus Meili
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Fish Populations ◽  
Chernobyl Fallout ◽  
Population Means ◽  
Activity Concentrations ◽  
Resource Specialization ◽  
Total Variability ◽  
Biomagnification Factors ◽  
Fish Trophic Position

One decade after the Chernobyl fallout, the variability of 137Cs activity concentrations among fish within a Swedish lake was >20-fold based on 1361 individuals from seven species collected continually during 1996–1999. Of the total variability, 64% was due to differences between species but only 7% due to temporal variation, which was 1.3-fold for the whole community and 1.3- to 2-fold for population means. Contamination increased with body size (0.6- to 6-fold) and decreased with body condition in most species (1.3-fold). Body size and time together accounted for about half of the total variation within populations. Fish 137Cs was related to differences in feeding ecology, both between and within populations. Biomagnification factors ranged from 2.4 to 5.8. Contamination was highest in piscivorous populations and individuals, intermediate in herbivores and zooplanktivores, and lowest in fish specialized in benthic invertebrates despite their association with contaminated sediments. The 137Cs variance within populations was not correlated with their niche width but moderately positively correlated with fish trophic position and strongly positively correlated with functional omnivory (diversity in prey 137Cs). We conclude that individual resource specialization is an important source of variation in 137Cs concentrations within fish populations.

scholarly journals Examining predator–prey body size, trophic level and body mass across marine and terrestrial mammals

2014 ◽  
Vol 281 (1797) ◽  
pp. 20142103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlee A. Tucker ◽  
Tracey L. Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Marine Environment ◽  
Trophic Level ◽  
Marine Mammals ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Trophic Levels ◽  
Predator Prey ◽  
Terrestrial Mammals

Predator–prey relationships and trophic levels are indicators of community structure, and are important for monitoring ecosystem changes. Mammals colonized the marine environment on seven separate occasions, which resulted in differences in species' physiology, morphology and behaviour. It is likely that these changes have had a major effect upon predator–prey relationships and trophic position; however, the effect of environment is yet to be clarified. We compiled a dataset, based on the literature, to explore the relationship between body mass, trophic level and predator–prey ratio across terrestrial ( n = 51) and marine ( n = 56) mammals. We did not find the expected positive relationship between trophic level and body mass, but we did find that marine carnivores sit 1.3 trophic levels higher than terrestrial carnivores. Also, marine mammals are largely carnivorous and have significantly larger predator–prey ratios compared with their terrestrial counterparts. We propose that primary productivity, and its availability, is important for mammalian trophic structure and body size. Also, energy flow and community structure in the marine environment are influenced by differences in energy efficiency and increased food web stability. Enhancing our knowledge of feeding ecology in mammals has the potential to provide insights into the structure and functioning of marine and terrestrial communities.

scholarly journals BODY SIZE AND TROPHIC POSITION IN A DIVERSE TROPICAL FOOD WEB

Ecology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 86 (9) ◽  
pp. 2530-2535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Layman ◽  
Kirk O. Winemiller ◽  
D. Albrey Arrington ◽  
David B. Jepsen
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Food Web ◽  
Trophic Position

scholarly journals Body size is negatively correlated with trophic position among cyprinids

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 150652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward D. Burress ◽  
Jordan M. Holcomb ◽  
Karine Orlandi Bonato ◽  
Jonathan W. Armbruster
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Isotope Analysis ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Species Traits ◽  
Food Web Structure ◽  
Mechanical Constraints ◽  
Web Structure ◽  
Significant Negative Relationship ◽  
Multiple Levels

Body size has many ecological and evolutionary implications that extend across multiple levels of organization. Body size is often positively correlated with species traits such as metabolism, prey size and trophic position (TP) due to physiological and mechanical constraints. We used stable isotope analysis to quantify TP among minnows across multiple assemblages that differed in their species composition, diversity and food web structure. Body size significantly predicted TP across different lineages and assemblages, and indicated a significant negative relationship. The observed negative relationship between body size and TP is contrary to conventional knowledge, and is likely to have arisen owing to highly clade-specific patterns, such that clades consist of either large benthic species or small pelagic species. Cyprinids probably subvert the physiological and mechanical constraints that generally produce a positive relationship between body size and TP using anatomical modifications and by consuming small-bodied prey, respectively. The need for herbivorous cyprinids to digest cellulose-rich foods probably selected for larger bodies to accommodate longer intestinal tracts and thereby to facilitate digestion of nutrient-poor resources, such as algae. Therefore, body size and TP are likely to have coevolved in cyprinids in association with specialization along the benthic to pelagic resource axis.

Normalized biomass size spectra in high Antarctic macrobenthic communities: linking trophic position and body size

2014 ◽  
Vol 506 ◽  
pp. 99-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Quiroga ◽  
D Gerdes ◽  
A Montiel ◽  
R Knust ◽  
U Jacob
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Size Spectra ◽  
Macrobenthic Communities

scholarly journals Exceptional body sizes but typical trophic structure in a Pleistocene food web

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 20160228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel M. Segura ◽  
Richard A. Fariña ◽  
Matías Arim
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Trophic Position ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Additional Energy ◽  
Quaternary Period ◽  
Species Vulnerability ◽  
Body Sizes ◽  
Energetic Constraints ◽  
The Relationship

In this study, we focused on the exceptionally large mammals inhabiting the Americas during the Quaternary period and the paramount role of body size in species ecology. We evaluated two main features of Pleistocene food webs: the relationship between body size and (i) trophic position and (ii) vulnerability to predation. Despite the large range of species sizes, we found a hump-shaped relationship between trophic position and body size. We also found a negative trend in species vulnerability similar to that observed in modern faunas. The largest species lived near the boundary of energetic constraints, such that any shift in resource availability could drive these species to extinction. Our results reinforce several features of megafauna ecology: (i) the negative relationship between trophic position and body size implies that large-sized species were particularly vulnerable to changes in energetic support; (ii) living close to energetic imbalance could favour the incorporation of additional energy sources, for example, a transition from a herbivorous to a scavenging diet in the largest species (e.g. Megatherium ) and (iii) the interactions and structure of Quaternary megafauna communities were shaped by similar forces to those shaping modern fauna communities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document