scholarly journals Vertical niche definition of test‐bearing protists (Rhizaria) into the twilight zone revealed by in situ imaging

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 2583-2602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tristan Biard ◽  
Mark D. Ohman
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tristan Biard ◽  
Mark D. Ohman

AbstractThe Rhizaria is a super-group of ameoboid protists with ubiquitous distributions, from the euphotic zone to the twilight zone and beyond. While rhizarians have been recently described as important contributors to both silica and carbon fluxes, we lack the most basic information about their ecological preferences. Here, using the in situ imaging (Underwater Vision Profiler 5), we characterize the vertical ecological niches of different test-bearing rhizarian taxa in the southernCalifornia Current Ecosystem. We define three vertical layers between 0-500 m occupied, respectively, by 1) surface dwelling and mostly symbiont-bearing rhizarians (Acantharia and Collodaria), 2) flux-feeding phaeodarians in the lower epipelagic (100-200 m), and 3) Foraminifera and Phaeodaria populations adjacent to the Oxygen Minimum Zone. We then use Generalized Additive Models to analyze the response of each rhizarian category to a suite of environmental variables. The models explain between 13 and 93% of the total variance observed for the different groups. While temperature and the depth of the deep chlorophyll maximum, appear as the main factors influencing populations in the upper 200 m, silicic acid concentration is the most important variable related to the abundance of mesopelagic phaeodarians. The relative importance of biotic interactions (e.g., predation, parasitism) is still to be considered, in order to fully incorporate the dynamics of test-bearing pelagic rhizarians in ecological and biogeochemical models.


2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (12) ◽  
pp. 427-428
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Noda ◽  
Pan Yi-Li ◽  
Ayato Tagawa ◽  
Takuma Kobayashi ◽  
Kiyotaka Sasagawa ◽  
...  

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2313
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Beconcini ◽  
Pietro Croce ◽  
Paolo Formichi ◽  
Filippo Landi ◽  
Benedetta Puccini

The evaluation of the shear behavior of masonry walls is a first fundamental step for the assessment of existing masonry structures in seismic zones. However, due to the complexity of modelling experimental behavior and the wide variety of masonry types characterizing historical structures, the definition of masonry’s mechanical behavior is still a critical issue. Since the possibility to perform in situ tests is very limited and often conflicting with the needs of preservation, the characterization of shear masonry behavior is generally based on reference values of mechanical properties provided in modern structural codes for recurrent masonry categories. In the paper, a combined test procedure for the experimental characterization of masonry mechanical parameters and the assessment of the shear behavior of masonry walls is presented together with the experimental results obtained on three stone masonry walls. The procedure consists of a combination of three different in situ tests to be performed on the investigated wall. First, a single flat jack test is executed to derive the normal compressive stress acting on the wall. Then a double flat jack test is carried out to estimate the elastic modulus. Finally, the proposed shear test is performed to derive the capacity curve and to estimate the shear modulus and the shear strength. The first results obtained in the experimental campaign carried out by the authors confirm the capability of the proposed methodology to assess the masonry mechanical parameters, reducing the uncertainty affecting the definition of capacity curves of walls and consequently the evaluation of seismic vulnerability of the investigated buildings.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongxin Fu ◽  
Ya Su ◽  
Ruliang Wang ◽  
Xue Lin ◽  
Xiangyu Jin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 838-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Sun ◽  
Zhan-Jun Li ◽  
Chun-Lin Liu ◽  
Hai-Xia Fu ◽  
Jiang-Shan Shen ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 024024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal Bar-Kochba ◽  
Saagar Govil ◽  
Jon P. Longtin ◽  
Andrew Gouldstone ◽  
Mary D. Frame

2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (3P2) ◽  
pp. 551-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Gentile ◽  
John J. Parker ◽  
Stewart J. Zweben

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document