scholarly journals Effects of Pelargonium sidoides extract vs roxithromycin on chemokine levels in nasal secretions of patients with uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis

Author(s):  
Aleksandar Perić ◽  
Sandra Vezmar Kovačević ◽  
Aleksandra Barać ◽  
Aneta V. Perić ◽  
Danilo Vojvodić
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-150
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Perić ◽  
Sandra Vezmar Kovačević ◽  
Aleksandra Barać ◽  
Dejan Gaćeša ◽  
Aneta V. Perić ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Bachert

Abstract Background The overuse of antibiotics for unjustified indications such as the management of acute uncomplicated rhinosinusitis has contributed to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria and prompted the need for alternative treatments. This review assesses the quality of evidence for the management of acute rhinosinusitis with herbal products, with the goal of positioning them among other treatments and identifying future research directions. The MEDLINE database was searched for randomized controlled trials with Sinupret®, Pelargonium sidoides extract, Cyclamen europaeum (CE), cineole, and GeloMyrtol®. Searches with N-acetylcysteine and mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) were performed to compare the strength of evidence of herbal products to these conventional products, which are indicated for acute rhinosinusitis. Main body Evidence was strongest for Sinupret, followed by Pelargonium sidoides extract. Their use in acute rhinosinusitis is supported by randomized placebo-controlled trials demonstrating both clinical efficacy and safety. Comparative data with conventional treatments such as topical glucocorticosteroids were found only for Sinupret and suggested comparable efficacy in a small study. For other herbal products, the overall level of evidence was low. The search retrieved two small-scale placebo-controlled randomized studies with CE nasal spray. The two trials were not powered to draw conclusions about the safety and efficacy of CE nasal spray and reported a lack of efficacy with CE on symptom reduction. Only one randomized placebo-controlled trial was identified for GeloMyrtol and cineole. These suggested an improvement in acute rhinosinusitis symptoms with both products, but the results warrant replication in larger trials. Studies directly comparing herbal products are scarce; one randomized trial has compared cineole with Sinupret, but the results need confirmation in further studies. Studies with N-acetylcysteine are limited to small-scale clinical trials, while MFNS is supported by a strength of evidence comparable to Sinupret in this indication. Conclusion State-of-the-art studies demonstrating the efficacy and safety of herbal products for the management of acute rhinosinusitis are available. Given that the evidence for Sinupret is the strongest and comparable to that of a widely available topical corticosteroid, MFNS, Sinupret may be considered for the management of acute uncomplicated rhinosinusitis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 430-440
Author(s):  
Claus Bachert ◽  

General background. The overuse of antibiotics, including for the treatment of uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis (ARS), has contributed to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains and has led to the need for alternative therapies. The review provides an assessment of the quality of evidence for the use of phytotherapy in ARS in order to determine its position among other therapies and future directions of research. The MEDLINE database was searched for randomized controlled studies of Sinupret®, Pelargonium sidoides extract (pelargonium), Cyclamen europaeum (cyclamen), cineole and GeloMyrtol®. We also searched for results from studies of a nasal spray with N-acetylcysteine and mometasone furoate (MF) in order to compare the effectiveness of herbal preparations with these traditional agents indicated for ARS. Main content. The strongest evidence was obtained for Sinupret®, followed by Pelargonium sidoides extract. Their use for treatment of ARS is supported by double-blind, placebo-controlled studies demonstrating both clinical efficacy and safety. Comparisons with traditional treatments such as topical glucocorticosteroids were found only for Sinupret® and they showed comparable efficacy, but in a small group of patients. For other herbal drugs, the pooled level of evidence was low. The search identified 2 small, placebo-controlled, randomized studies of cyclamen nasal spray. In two studies, it was impossible to make conclusions about the safety and efficacy of cyclamen nasal spray and reported no efficacy of cyclamen in reducing symptoms. We found only one randomized placebo-controlled study of GeloMyrtol® and cineol. The mention studies have showed a reduction in ARS symptoms with these two drugs, but larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. There are few studies that directly compared herbal drugs. In one randomized study, cineol was compared with Sinupret®, but the results need to be confirmed in further studies. Studies of N-acetylcysteine are limited to small clinical trials, while the use of MF nasal spray has been confirmed with results comparable in evidence to Sinupret® for the respective indications. Conclusions. There are modern studies that demonstrate the efficacy and safety of herbal drugs for ARS treatment. Given that the evidence for Sinupret® is the strongest and comparable to that for the widely available topical corticosteroid, MF, Sinupret could be considered for the treatment of uncomplicated ARS.


Planta Medica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S1-S381
Author(s):  
S Duchow ◽  
R Dahlke ◽  
T Geske ◽  
W Blaschek ◽  
B Classen

Skull Base ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tsakanikos
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document