scholarly journals Development of in‐house genetic screening for pediatric hearing loss

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-505
Author(s):  
Karl W. Doerfer ◽  
Tara Sander ◽  
Girija G. Konduri ◽  
David R. Friedland ◽  
Joseph E. Kerschner ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 654-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlie Driscoll ◽  
Rachael Beswick ◽  
Eloise Doherty ◽  
Rhea D'Silva ◽  
Ann Cross

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Marina Davcheva Chakar ◽  
Gjorgji Bozhinovski ◽  
Emilija Shukarova Stefanovska ◽  
Dejan Trajkov

Reduction of hearing is the most common sensory impairment among newborns with an incidence of 1-3 per 1000 births. Introduction of an Auditory Newborn screening program allows early identification of hearing impairment. Mainly, congenital hearing loss in early childhood is a result of genetic changes. Due to high frequency of GJB2 pathogenic variants, its molecular characterization among sensorineural hearing reduction cases is already conducted as a routine analysis in many countries. The aim of this study is to show our initial results in the effort to determine whether genetic screening along with the standard hearing screening in newborns is justified. Otoacoustic emission (OAE) method was conducted in 223 newborns at risk of hearing impairment. Among them, 7 did not pass the test in both ears while 9 exhibited one-sided hearing loss. In all 7 children with indication of profound bilateral deafness, the diagnosis was confirmed using auditory brainstem response. Genetic screening of GJB2 gene was performed in 6 of them. Genetic analysis of GJB2 revealed homozygous state of the most common pathogenic variant 35delG in 3 (50%) of the analyzed infants. In the remaining 3 no pathogenic variant was determined. The results indicate that performing auditory OAE together with genetic screening is justified. In newborns who have not passed the hearing screening test and have profound hearing loss, without other syndrome traits, screening for mutations of GJB2 gene should be conducted. Genetic screening enables establishment of early definite diagnosis for deafness and helps in conducting adequate therapy providing timely rehabilitation and social inclusion of deaf child. Key words: hearing loss, genetic screening, auditory screening, GJB2 gene


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhua Chen ◽  
Qingwen Zhu ◽  
Jingyu Li ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Wenjun Bian ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: Concurrent hearing and genetic screening of newborns is expected to play an important role in the early detection and diagnosis of congenital deafness, which triggers an intervention, as well as in predicting late-onset and progressive hearing loss and identifying individuals who are at risk of drug-induced hearing loss (HL).Methods: A Deafness Gene Variant Detection Array Kit covering fifteen variants in four genes was used to screen for deafness genes in 18001 infants.Results: A total of 108 neonates did not pass the second hearing screening. In addition, 912 (5.07%) screened positive for deafness-associated variants, including 78 (0.43%) genetically referred and 834 (4.63%) genetic deafness-associated variant carriers. Of the 912 screened positive cases, 880 passed the hearing screening, and 32 failed. A total of 62 (0.34%) cases carried the mtDNA 12S rRNA variants. A total of 108 cases did not pass the hearing screening and underwent a hearing diagnostic examination. An expanded DNA test identified 17 patients who possessed deafness gene mutations, increasing the detection rate to 5.16%.Conclusion: Early detection, diagnosis, and interventions are necessary for newborns who are susceptible to deafness. A good strategy is to use a small panel to quickly screen all subjects and then apply an extended panel to study the cause of deafness in affected patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
G. Iliev ◽  
P. Ivanova ◽  
M. Milkov

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Bliznetz ◽  
D. N. Martsul ◽  
O. G. Khorov ◽  
T. G. Markova ◽  
A. V. Polyakov

2011 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Misono ◽  
Kathleen C. Y. Sie ◽  
Noel S. Weiss ◽  
Meei-li Huang ◽  
Michael Boeckh ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 547-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Ann Hawley ◽  
Donald M. Goldberg ◽  
Samantha Anne

2013 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle R. Taylor ◽  
Adam P. DeLuca ◽  
A. Eliot Shearer ◽  
Michael S. Hildebrand ◽  
E. Ann Black-Ziegelbein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document