Hearing Preservation Microsurgery in Vestibular Schwannomas: Worth Attempting in “Larger” Tumors?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Wallerius ◽  
Robert J. Macielak ◽  
Skye K. Lawlor ◽  
Christine M. Lohse ◽  
Brian A. Neff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas

Hearing Preservation in Retrosigmoid Approach of Small Vestibular Schwannomas

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1469-1472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Tringali ◽  
Chantal Ferber-Viart ◽  
Carine Fuchsmann ◽  
Guillaume Buiret ◽  
Sandra Zaouche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Retrosigmoid Approach ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas

Stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Akiyoshi Ogino ◽  
L. Dade Lunsford ◽  
Hao Long ◽  
Stephen Johnson ◽  
Andrew Faramand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Observation Interval ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Additional Intervention ◽  
First Line Treatment

OBJECTIVEThis report evaluates the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as the first-line treatment of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (VSs).METHODSBetween 1987 and 2017, the authors identified 209 patients who underwent SRS as the primary intervention for a unilateral intracanalicular VS. The median patient age was 54 years (range 22–85 years); 94 patients were male and 115 were female. Three patients had facial neuropathy at the time of SRS. One hundred fifty-five patients (74%) had serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson [GR] grades I and II) at the time of SRS. The median tumor volume was 0.17 cm3 (range 0.015–0.63 cm3). The median margin dose was 12.5 Gy (range 11.0–25.0 Gy). The median maximum dose was 24.0 Gy (range 15.7–50.0 Gy).RESULTSThe progression-free survival rates of all patients with intracanalicular VS were 97.5% at 3 years, 95.6% at 5 years, and 92.1% at 10 years. The rates of freedom from the need for any additional intervention were 99.4% at 3 years, 98.3% at 5 years, and 98.3% at 10 years. The serviceable hearing preservation rates in GR grade I and II patients at the time of SRS were 76.6% at 3 years, 63.5% at 5 years, and 27.3% at 10 years. In univariate analysis, younger age (< 55 years, p = 0.011), better initial hearing (GR grade I, p < 0.001), and smaller tumor volumes (< 0.14 cm3, p = 0.016) were significantly associated with improved hearing preservation. In multivariate analysis, better hearing (GR grade I, p = 0.001, HR 2.869, 95% CI 1.569–5.248) and smaller tumor volumes (< 0.14 cm3, p = 0.033, HR 2.071, 95% CI 1.059–4.047) at the time of SRS were significantly associated with improved hearing preservation. The hearing preservation rates of patients with GR grade I VS were 88.1% at 3 years, 77.9% at 5 years, and 38.1% at 10 years. The hearing preservation rates of patients with VSs smaller than 0.14 cm3 were 85.5% at 3 years, 77.7% at 5 years, and 42.6% at 10 years. Facial neuropathy developed in 1.4% from 6 to 156 months after SRS.CONCLUSIONSSRS provided sustained tumor control in more than 90% of patients with intracanalicular VS at 10 years and freedom from the need for additional intervention in more than 98% at 10 years. Patients with initially better hearing and smaller VSs had enhanced serviceable hearing preservation during an observation interval up to 10 years after SRS.

scholarly journals Diamond knife dissection technique for nerve preservation during resection of large vestibular schwannomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. V8
Author(s):  
Julia Shawarba ◽  
Cand Med ◽  
Matthias Tomschik ◽  
Karl Roessler
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Schwannoma ◽  
Facial Nerve Palsy ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas ◽  
Nerve Preservation ◽  
Dissection Techniques ◽  
Dissection Technique ◽  
Large Vestibular Schwannoma ◽  
Facial Function ◽  
Diamond Knife

Facial and cochlear nerve preservation in large vestibular schwannomas is a major challenge. Bimanual pincers or plate-knife dissection techniques have been described as crucial for nerve preservation. The authors demonstrate a recently applied diamond knife dissection technique to peel the nerves from the tumor capsule. This technique minimizes the nerve trauma significantly, and complete resection of a large vestibular schwannoma without any facial nerve palsy and hearing preservation is possible. The authors illustrate this technique during surgery of a 2.6-cm vestibular schwannoma in a 27-year-old male patient resulting in normal facial function and preserved hearing postoperatively. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2021.7.FOCVID21104

scholarly journals Letter: Postoperative Hearing Preservation in Patients Undergoing Retrosigmoid Craniotomy for Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review of 2034 Patients

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. E1140-E1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantin Tuleasca ◽  
Roy Thomas Daniel ◽  
Daniele Starnoni ◽  
Mercy George ◽  
Raphael Maire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas

scholarly journals Hearing Preservation Surgery for Vestibular Schwannomas

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-241
Author(s):  
Rick F. Nelson ◽  
Marlan R. Hansen ◽  
Bruce J. Gantz
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas ◽  
Hearing Preservation Surgery

Optimal outcomes for hearing preservation in the management of small vestibular schwannomas

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (7) ◽  
pp. 606-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
K A Peng ◽  
E P Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas ◽  
Middle Fossa ◽  
Stereotactic Radiation ◽  
Middle Fossa Approach ◽  
Small Tumour ◽  
Optimal Outcomes ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Hearing Outcomes

AbstractObjective:To undertake a systematic review of the role of microsurgery, in relation to observation and stereotactic radiation, in the management of small vestibular schwannomas with serviceable hearing.Methods:The Medline database was searched for publications that included the terms ‘vestibular schwannoma’ and/or ‘acoustic neuroma’, occurring in conjunction with ‘hearing’. Articles were manually screened to identify those concerning vestibular schwannomas under 1.5 cm in greatest dimension. Thereafter, only publications discussing both pre-operative and post-operative hearing were considered.Results:Twenty-six papers were identified. Observation is an acceptable strategy for small tumours with slow growth where hearing preservation is not a consideration. In contrast, microsurgery, including the middle fossa approach, may provide excellent hearing outcomes, particularly when a small tumour has begun to cause hearing loss. Immediate post-operative hearing usually predicts long-term hearing. Recent data on stereotactic radiation suggest long-term deterioration of hearing following definitive therapy.Conclusion:In patients under the age of 65 years with small vestibular schwannomas, microsurgery via the middle fossa approach offers durable preservation of hearing.

scholarly journals Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: average 10-year follow-up results focusing on long-term hearing preservation

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 64-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Watanabe ◽  
Masaaki Yamamoto ◽  
Takuya Kawabe ◽  
Takao Koiso ◽  
Tetsuya Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Univariable Analysis

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to reappraise long-term treatment outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannomas (VSs). The authors used a database that included patients who underwent SRS with a unique dose-planning technique, i.e., partial tumor coverage designed to avoid excess irradiation of the facial and cochlear nerves, focusing on tumor control and hearing preservation. Clinical factors associated with post-SRS tumor control and long-term hearing preservation were also analyzed.METHODSThis institutional review board–approved, retrospective cohort study used the authors' prospectively accumulated database. Among 207 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for VSs between 1990 and 2005, 183 (who were followed up for at least 36 post-SRS months) were studied. The median tumor volume was 2.0 cm3 (range 0.05–26.2 cm3). The median prescribed dose at the tumor periphery was 12.0 Gy (range 8.8–15.0 Gy; 12.0 Gy was used in 171 patients [93%]), whereas tumor portions facing the facial and cochlear nerves were irradiated with 10.0 Gy. As a result, 72%–99% of each tumor was irradiated with the prescribed dose. The mean cochlear doses ranged from 2.3 to 5.7 Gy (median 4.1 Gy).RESULTSThe median durations of imaging and audiometric follow-up were 114 months (interquartile range 73–144 months) and 59 months (interquartile range 33–109 months), respectively. Tumor shrinkage was documented in 110 (61%), no change in 48 (27%), and enlargement in the other 22 (12%) patients. A further procedure (FP) was required in 15 (8%) patients. Thus, the tumor growth control rate was 88% and the clinical control rate (i.e., no need for an FP) was 92%. The cumulative FP-free rates were 96%, 93%, and 87% at the 60th, 120th, and 180th post-SRS month, respectively. Six (3%) patients experienced facial pain, and 2 developed transient facial palsy. Serviceable hearing was defined as a pure tone audiogram result better than 50 dB. Among the 66 patients with serviceable hearing before SRS who were followed up, hearing acuity was preserved in 23 (35%). Actuarial serviceable hearing preservation rates were 49%, 24%, and 12% at the 60th, 120th, and 180th post-SRS month, respectively. On univariable analysis, only cystic-type tumor (HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.18–9.36; p = 0.02) was shown to have a significantly unfavorable association with FP. Multivariable analysis followed by univariable analysis revealed that higher age (≥ 65 years: HR 2.66, 95% CI 1.16–5.92; p = 0.02), larger tumor volume (≥ 8 cm3: HR 5.36, 95% CI 1.20–17.4; p = 0.03), and higher cochlear dose (mean cochlear dose > 4.2 Gy: HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.07–4.77; p = 0.03) were unfavorable factors for hearing preservation.CONCLUSIONSStereotactic radiosurgery achieved good long-term results in this series. Tumor control was acceptable, and there were few serious complications in patients with small- to medium-sized VSs. Unfortunately, hearing preservation was not satisfactory. However, the longer the observation period, the more important it becomes to compare post-SRS hearing decreases with the natural decline in untreated cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document