Factors Influencing a Clinician‐Scientist Career Path in Otolaryngology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Harris ◽  
Olivia E. Edstrom
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Desplantie MDCM ◽  
Kristian B. Filion PhD ◽  
Mark J. Eisenberg MD MPH

In recent decades, it has become increasingly difficult to attract medical trainees to the clinician-scientist pathway. Several measures have been undertaken to increase the number of clinician-scientists, but the anticipated results have not been obtained.1 In many ways, the clinician-scientist can be considered an “endangered species.”2 To promote this career path, there is increasing interest in some specialties in developing training programs that would encourage medical students to pursue research by increasing their exposure to research early in their training.3 Our study sought to examine cardiology fellows’ perceptions of the clinician-scientist career path, and their ideas on how to promote it.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. E5-E8
Author(s):  
Sara Mirali ◽  
Kevin Fan ◽  
Elina K. Cook ◽  
Tina B. Marvasti

Clinician scientists are physicians who are uniquely trained to bridge the gap between scientific discovery and clinical practice. However, the challenges of integrating research and medicine are often not directly addressed in the clinician scientist training programs. Furthermore, the demanding training path is financially and personally daunting. Previous studies have shown that MD/PhD trainees value the advice and expertise of senior mentors in navigating their academic career path. Despite this demand for mentors, there is a lack of formal mentorship initiatives at the institutional level across Canada. Recently, MD/PhD trainees have attempted to address this issue by implementing a nationwide mentorship match, with the aim of making mentorship more accessible to trainees across Canada.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Chetta ◽  
Kristoffer B. Sugg ◽  
Rafael J. Diaz-Garcia ◽  
Steven J. Kasten

Background: Plastic surgery residency program directors have an interest in recruiting applicants who show an interest in an academic practice. Medical school achievements (ie, United States Medical Licensing Examination® scores, publications, and Alpha Omega Alpha status) are metrics assessed to grade applicants but may not correlate with ultimately choosing an academic career. Objective: This study was designed to investigate factors influencing residents’ choices for or against academic careers. Methods: A 25-item online questionnaire was designed to measure baseline interest in academic plastic surgery and factors that influence decisions to continue on or abandon that career path. This questionnaire was disseminated to the integrated/combined plastic surgery residents during the 2013 to 2014 academic year. Results: One hundred twenty-five respondents indicated that they were currently interested in pursuing academic practice (n = 78) or had lost interest in academic practice (n = 47). Among all respondents, 92.8% (n = 116) stated they were interested in academic careers at the time of residency application, but one-third (n = 41) subsequently lost interest. Those residents who retained interest in academic careers indicated resident/medical student educational opportunities (57%) and complexity of patients (52%) as reasons. Those who lost interest cited a lack of autonomy (43%), publishing requirements (32%), and income discrepancy (26%) as reasons. Discussion: Many residents report losing interest in academics during residency. Traditional metrics valued in the recruitment process may not serve as positive predictors of an academic career path. Conclusion: Reasons why residents lose interest are not easily correctable, but mentorship, adequate career counseling, and research opportunities during training remain factors that can be addressed across all residency programs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey D. Bartlett ◽  
Joleen Kremin ◽  
K. Kelli Saunders ◽  
David A. Wood

ABSTRACT This paper examines factors affecting non-accounting business professionals' willingness to work in internal auditing. In a 2 × 6 experiment with 502 participants from across the country, we find that, in contrast to prior research examining accountants, business professionals have relatively favorable views of internal audit. Although they hold favorable views, participants were still less likely to apply for a position labeled as internal audit than an identical position with an alternate label. Varying the structure of internal audit, including job responsibilities, career path, and sourcing arrangement, did not affect participants' willingness to apply for an internal audit position. We also find that high academically performing participants are less likely to apply to work in internal audit. Finally, based on an additional survey of 46 business students, we find that lower academically performing students would be more interested in internal audit if it paid more, but higher academically performing students would be more interested if internal audit performed more interesting work, was in a preferred company/field, or if they had more understanding of the profession. Data Availability: Contact the authors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 660-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Defruyt ◽  
Paul Wylleman ◽  
Jolan Kegelaers ◽  
Koen De Brandt

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg MT Hare

The pathway to a successful career as a Clinician Scientist has no shortage of challenges. However, most of those who embark upon this difficult journey are rewarded for their efforts. The following summarizes one perspective on how to manage the challenges and enjoy the rewards of a career as a Clinician Scientist.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Reeve ◽  
Margot Skinner ◽  
Annemarie Lee ◽  
Lisa Wilson ◽  
Jennifer A. Alison,

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document