Medical Management for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil K. Mehta ◽  
Cheng Ma ◽  
Shaun A. Nguyen ◽  
Theodore R. McRackan ◽  
Ted A. Meyer ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (5) ◽  
pp. 870-882
Author(s):  
Michael H. Froehlich ◽  
Phong T. Le ◽  
Shaun A. Nguyen ◽  
Theodore R. McRackan ◽  
Habib G. Rizk ◽  
...  

Objective To examine the effectiveness of eustachian tube balloon dilation for the treatment of eustachian tube dysfunction. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Review Methods A systematic review of eustachian tube balloon dilation for the treatment of eustachian tube dysfunction was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify randomized control trials and prospective and retrospective studies published prior to January 31, 2019. Meta-analysis of proportions evaluated 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) scores, tympanometry, otoscopy findings, and the ability to perform a Valsalva maneuver. Results The systematic review identified 35 studies. Twelve studies met inclusion for meta-analysis (448 patients). Mean ETDQ7 scores decreased by 2.13 from baseline to 6 weeks (95% CI, –3.02 to −1.24; P < .001). From baseline to 6 weeks, 53.0% of patients had improvement in tympanograms ( P < .001). At the long-term point (3-12 months), 50.5% of patients had improved tympanograms from baseline ( P < .001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of improved tympanograms at 6 weeks compared to long term ( P = .535). Normal otoscopy exams at baseline increased by 30.0% at 6 weeks ( P < .001) and 55.4% in the long term ( P < .001). There was a 67.8% increase in proportion of patients able to perform a Valsalva maneuver in the long term compared to baseline ( P < .001). Conclusion Eustachian tube balloon dilation appears to be associated with improvement in subjective and objective treatment outcome metrics. The improvement appears stable at 3 to 12 months after dilation. Patients with eustachian tube dysfunction are likely to benefit from balloon dilation, particularly those with medication-refractory disease.


2018 ◽  
Vol 158 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tang-Chuan Wang ◽  
Chia-Der Lin ◽  
Tzu-Ching Shih ◽  
Hsiung-Kwang Chung ◽  
Ching-Yuang Wang ◽  
...  

Objective We aimed to perform a meta-analysis examining balloon dilatation and laser tuboplasty for the treatment of eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). Data Sources PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase search up to April 18, 2016, with the following keywords: eustachian, middle-ear, eustachian tuboplasty, balloon tuboplasty, laser tuboplasty, laser dilatation, and balloon dilatation. Review Methods Randomized controlled trials and prospective, retrospective, and 1-arm studies of patients with ETD treated with balloon dilatation or laser tuboplasty were included. Outcome measures were improvement of eustachian tube score (ETS) and tympanometry and Valsalva maneuver results. Results Two retrospective and 11 prospective studies were included (1063 patients; 942 treated with balloon and 121 with laser tuboplasty). Balloon tuboplasty resulted in a significant improvement of ETS (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-1.66; P = .009) and, compared with laser tuboplasty, a greater tympanometry improvement rate (pooled event rate = 73% vs 13%; P = .001). Valsalva maneuver improvement rate was not different between the group results (pooled event rate = 67% vs 50%; P = .472). The maximum number of studies that provided outcome data for any one measure was only 4, and sensitivity analysis indicated ETS results may have been overly influenced by 2 studies. No balloon tuboplasty studies reported ETS data, preventing comparison between the 2 procedures. Conclusion Both procedures can improve symptoms of ETD; however, because of the limited numbers of studies reporting data of the outcomes of interest, it remains unclear if one procedure provides greater benefits.


2017 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolien Marieke Lieselot Huisman ◽  
Froukje Jantina Verdam ◽  
Inge Stegeman ◽  
Jacob Alexander de Ru

2019 ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
Owen J. O’Neill ◽  
Elizabeth Smykowski ◽  
Jo Ann Marker ◽  
Lubiha Perez ◽  
drah Gurash ◽  
...  

Introduction: Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and middle ear barotrauma (MEB) are the most common adverse effects of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) treatments. Patients practice equalization maneuvers to prevent ETD and MEB prior to hyperbaric exposure. Some patients are still unable to equalize middle ear pressure. This ETD results in undesirable consequences, including barotrauma, treatment with medications or surgical myringotomy with tube placement and interruption of HBO2. When additional medications and myringotomy are employed, they are associated with additional complications. Methods: A device known as the Ear Popper® has been reported to reduce complications from serous otitis media and reduce the need for surgical interventions (myringotomy). Patients unable to equalize middle ear pressure during initial compression in the hyperbaric chamber were allowed to use the device for rescue. All hyperbaric treatments were compressed using a United States Navy TT9, or a 45-fsw hyperbaric treatment schedule. Patients with persistent ETD and the inability to equalize middle ear pressure were given the Ear Popper upon consideration of terminating their treatment. Results: The Ear Popper allowed all patients to successfully equalize middle ear pressure and complete their treatments. Conclusion: This study substantiates the use of this device to assist in allowing pressurization of the middle ear space in patients otherwise unable to achieve equalization of middle ear pressure during HBO2 treatment in a multiplace chamber.


2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132198945
Author(s):  
Alessandra Manno ◽  
Giannicola Iannella ◽  
Vincenzo Savastano ◽  
Tommaso Vittori ◽  
Serena Bertin ◽  
...  

Introduction: To our knowledge, few papers have addressed preoperative evaluation of the impact of adenoid hypertrophy (AH) on the pathogenesis of eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) in children with otitis media with effusion (OME). Aim: The aim of this study was 2-fold: first, to evaluate ETD using tubomanometry and Eustachian Tube Score 7 (ETS-7), in a group of children having AH; second, to assess the clinical impact of adenoidectomy on the ETD of these patients. Methods: Fifty patients, aged 4 to 15 years, underwent adenoidectomy based on various parameters: size of the adenoids causing canal obstruction (grades 1-4), the presence of OME, and recurrent episodes of rhinosinusitis. The function of the eustachian tube was evaluated using ETS-7 before and after surgical treatment. The patients were followed up for 6 months. Results: Forty children presented ETD. Of these, 36 had a grade 4 AH. The preoperative mean value for ETS-7 was 6.62. The mean postoperative ETS-7 score showed a value of 9.60 with a statistical difference compared to the preoperative value ( P = .0015). Conclusions: Adenoid hypertrophy has a high impact on the frequency of ETD. In the patients observed in the present study, the ETS-7 score appeared to be a valid tool for assessing ETD both preoperatively and postoperatively. Adenoidectomy seemed to be effective in improving ETD as well as middle ear ventilation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document