Olfactory Dysfunction is not a Determinant Of patient‐Reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis Disease Control

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. McCann ◽  
Michal Trope ◽  
Victoria L. Walker ◽  
Tazheh A. Kavoosi ◽  
Marlene M. Speth ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
K.M. Phillips ◽  
F.A. Houssein ◽  
K. Singerman ◽  
L.M. Boeckermann ◽  
A.R. Sedaghat

Background: Disease control is an important treatment goal for chronic uncurable conditions such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The objective of this study was to determine whether patient-reported CRS disease control is a valid reflection of disease burden. Methods: Prospective longitudinal study of 300 CRS patients (35% CRS with nasal polyps, 65% CRS without nasal polyps). At enrollment and at a subsequent follow-up timepoint, all participants were asked to rate their CRS disease control as “not at all,” “a little,” “somewhat,” “very,” or “completely”, as well as to complete a 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and the 5-dimension EuroQol general health questionnaire from which the visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS) was used. Results: At enrollment and follow-up timepoints, patient-reported CRS disease control was significantly correlated with SNOT-22 and EQ-5D VAS scores. The change in patient-reported CRS disease control was significantly correlated with change in SNOT-22 and change in EQ-5D VAS scores. There was significant cross-sectional and longitudinal correlation between patient-reported control and all SNOT-22 subdomain scores. A SNOT-22 score of ≤ 25 points or lower, or an EQ-5D VAS score of ≥77 was predictive of having well - (i.e. “very” or “completely”) controlled CRS. Conclusions: Patient-reported CRS disease control is a valid measure of CRS disease burden and general QOL. A patient-reported assessment of CRS disease control could be considered as a component of a more comprehensive measure of CRS disease control.


Author(s):  
Nadim Saydy ◽  
Sami P. Moubayed ◽  
Marie Bussières ◽  
Arif Janjua ◽  
Shaun Kilty ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Many experts feel that in the absence of well-defined goals for success, they have an easier time identifying failure. As success ought to not be defined only by absence of failure, we aimed to define optimal outcomes for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) by obtaining expert surgeon perspectives. Methods A total of 12 surgeons participated in this targeted consultation. Face to face semi-structured interviews were performed with expert surgeons in the field of CRS and ESS. General impressions and personal definitions of acceptable operative success and optimal operative outcomes were compiled and summarized. Results According to an expert survey, patients’ main objectives are an improvement in their chief complain, a general improvement in quality of life (QoL), and a better overall symptomatic control. The most important aspects of endoscopy for defining a successful intervention were an adequate mucus circulation, a healthy mucosa, minimal edema, and patency of all explored cavities or ostia. In the assessment of surgical outcomes, it was determined that both objective and patient reported data must be carefully examined, with more attention given to subjective outcomes. Conclusions According to data gathered from a Canadian expert consultation, a definition of success must be based on both subjective data and nasal endoscopy. We propose to define an acceptable outcome as either a subjective improvement of at least the minimal clinically improvement difference of a validated patient reported outcome questionnaire, along with a satisfactory endoscopic result (1) or a complete subjective resolution with a sub-optimal endoscopy (2). Graphical abstract


2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (5) ◽  
pp. 890-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie M. Phillips ◽  
Eric Barbarite ◽  
Lloyd P. Hoehle ◽  
David S. Caradonna ◽  
Stacey T. Gray ◽  
...  

Objective Acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is associated with significant quality-of-life decreases. We sought to determine characteristics associated with an exacerbation-prone phenotype in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Study Design Cross-sectional. Setting Tertiary care rhinology clinic. Subjects Patients with CRS (N = 209). Methods Patient-reported number of sinus infections, CRS-related antibiotics, and CRS-related oral corticosteroids taken in the last 12 months were used as metrics for AECRS frequency. Sinonasal symptom burden was assessed with the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Ninety patients reporting 0 for all AECRS metrics were considered to have had no AECRS in the prior 12 months. A total of 119 patients reported >3 on at least 1 AECRS metric and were considered as having an exacerbation-prone phenotype. Characteristics associated with patients with an exacerbation-prone phenotype were identified with exploratory regression analysis. Results An exacerbation-prone phenotype was positively associated with comorbid asthma (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.42-9.50, P = .007) and SNOT-22 (ORadj = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09, P < .001). Polyps were negatively associated (ORadj = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11-0.68, P = .005) with an exacerbation-prone phenotype. SNOT-22 score ≥24 identified patients with an exacerbation-prone phenotype with a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 57.8%. Having either a SNOT-22 score ≥24 with a nasal subdomain score ≥12 or a SNOT-22 score ≥24 with an ear/facial discomfort subdomain score ≥3 provided >80% sensitivity and specificity for detecting patients prone to exacerbation. Conclusions In total, these results point to a CRS exacerbation-prone phenotype characterized by high sinonasal disease burden with comorbid asthma but interestingly without polyps.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Namjil N. Tsybikov ◽  
Elena V. Egorova ◽  
Boris I. Kuznik ◽  
Elena V. Fefelova ◽  
Eli Magen

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney J. Schlosser ◽  
Kristina A. Storck ◽  
Luke Rudmik ◽  
Timothy L. Smith ◽  
Jess C. Mace ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4115-4115
Author(s):  
Timothy Jay Price ◽  
Gabby Cehic ◽  
Eric Andrew Wachter ◽  
Ian D. Kirkwood ◽  
Jessica Reid ◽  
...  

4115 Background: Metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (mNEN) originating in the gastrointestinal tract are frequently slow growing yet both symptom and disease control remain important. Treatment options include resection, systemic somatostatin analogues (SSA), and systemic peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Additional options are needed; we have explored intralesional (IL) rose bengal disodium (PV-10), an investigational autolytic immunotherapy that can yield immunogenic cell death and disease-specific functional adaptive immunity. Methods: This phase 1 study evaluated safety, tolerability and impact on symptoms and biochemical markers resulting from IL PV-10 administered percutaneously to hepatic lesions in patients (pts) with progressive mNEN not amenable to resection or other potentially curative therapy. Eligible lesion(s) were 1.0 - 3.9 cm in longest diameter with amount of PV-10 administered proportional to size. Cohort 1 (n = 6 pts) received PV-10 to a single lesion per treatment cycle; Cohort 2 (n = 6) could receive injection to multiple lesions per treatment cycle. Pts could receive further PV-10 ≥6 weeks after prior injection. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) assessed by contrast enhanced CT (RECIST 1.1) and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET, biochemical response (CgA) and patient-reported outcome (EORTC QLQ-C30 and GI.NET21 QOL instruments). Results: Twelve pts were enrolled, 50% male, median age 66 yrs (range 47-79). Primary sites: 7 small bowel, 2 pancreas, 1 caecal, 2 unknown; grade: Gd1 = 5, Gd2 = 7. All pts had received SSA and PRRT as part of previous therapy and all had symptomatic, progressive disease. Median CgA was 1585 (range 35-10370). One lesion was injected per cycle for all 12 pts; none were suitable for multiple injections. One pt received 4 sequential PV-10 treatment cycles, 3 received 2 cycles, and 8 received 1 cycle. Toxicity was consistent with experience in other hepatic malignancies: post-procedure pain was reported by most pts; grade 3 photosensitivity reaction occurred in 1 pt; and grade 1 elevation of hepatic enzymes attributed to PV-10 occurred in 2 pts, resolving by day 7. Additionally, carcinoid flare occurred in 1 pt. ORR of injected lesions was 42%; patient-level disease control was 84%. Estimated PFS was 9.2 months; median OS was 22.5 months. CgA remained stable in 10 pts and upregulation of NK and activated CD4+ T lymphocytes was observed post-injection. QOL data at months 1 and 3 showed stable or improved carcinoid symptoms and global health status in 9 pts. Conclusions: PV-10 elicited no safety concerns with encouraging evidence of both local and systemic disease and symptom control in a heavily pre-treated population. Multiple cycles were delivered safely in suitable patients. Adaptive immune upregulation is consistent with other solid tumors and supports potential systemic benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT02693067.


2021 ◽  
pp. 194589242110614
Author(s):  
Jacob Fried ◽  
Erick Yuen ◽  
David A. Gudis ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser ◽  
Shaun A. Nguyen ◽  
...  

Background Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) presents with broad and systemic manifestations, including impaired sleep; however, the impact of CRS treatments upon sleep is unknown. Objective To establish the effect of medical or surgical CRS treatment on subjective and objective sleep metrics for patients not previously diagnosed with sleep apnea. Methods Review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed from the databases’ date of inception through August 13, 2020, for studies evaluating the effect of CRS treatment on sleep quality. All studies reporting on subjective and objective sleep parameters for patients with CRS, with completed pre- and posttreatment data were included. Studies composed of patients with diagnosed sleep apnea were excluded. Results Sixteen unique studies reporting data on a total of 1770 patients (mean age, 50.6 ± 15.6 (n = 1675) years) following treatment for CRS were included. Patient-reported outcome measures, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Fatigue Severity Scale, demonstrated mean posttreatment differences of −2.8 (95% CI: −4.9 to −0.7), −2.4 (95% CI: −3.7 to −1.2), and −1.2 (95% CI: −1.6 to −0.7), respectively. The SNOT-22 and its sleep domain demonstrated a mean posttreatment difference of −23.5 (95% CI: −31.7 to −15.3) and −5.4 (95% CI: −6.8 to −4.0), respectively. EpSS, FSS and SNOT-22 exceeded their respective reported MCID values. Objective findings did not significantly change with treatment; mean difference: AHI: 0.7 (95% CI: −1.5 to 2.9), oxygen nadir: 0.3 (95% CI: −0.4 to 0.9). Conclusions Treatment of CRS may lead to clinically meaningful reduction in disease burden and improvements in both overall sleep quality and patient-reported fatigue. Despite clinically meaningful quality of life improvements, objective sleep parameters did not demonstrate corresponding posttreatment improvements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document