scholarly journals Cochlear Implantation in Candidates With Moderate‐to‐Severe Hearing Loss and Poor Speech Perception

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Hoppe ◽  
Thomas Hocke ◽  
Anne Hast ◽  
Heinrich Iro
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Severe Hearing Loss

scholarly journals Complications of cochlear implant surgery

2004 ◽  
Vol 132 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 302-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rade Kosanovic ◽  
Zoran Ivankovic ◽  
Sandra Stojanovic
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Fatal Outcome ◽  
Modern Technology ◽  
Hearing Impairments ◽  
Severe Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implant Surgery ◽  
Coding Strategies ◽  
The World

During the last several decades, cochlear implant has been fully recognized in treatment of severe hearing loss. Development of modern technology enabled inconceivable possibilities of technical qualities of the device as well as development of usable coding strategies, which led to extraordinary results in patient rehabilitation. Although cochlear implantation has become one of the routine operative procedures throughout the world nowadays, it gives rise to certain complications. These complications, though rare, can sometimes be very serious, even with fatal outcome. If cochlear implantation is performed by experienced and well-educated team of experts, the possibility of complications is minimal and is certainly not the argument against cochlear implantation as a method of treatment of severe hearing impairments.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Postlingual Progressive Steeply Sloping High-Frequency Hearing Loss

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 913-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Meredith ◽  
Jay T. Rubinstein ◽  
Kathleen C. Y. Sie ◽  
Susan J. Norton
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Rapid Improvement ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Monosyllabic Word

Background: Children with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) lack access to critical high-frequency cues despite the use of advanced hearing aid technology. In addition, their auditory-only aided speech perception abilities often meet Food and Drug Administration criteria for cochlear implantation. Purpose: The objective of this study was to describe hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes in a group of young children with steeply sloping SNHL who received a cochlear implant (CI). Research Design: Retrospective case series. Study Sample: Eight children with steeply sloping postlingual progressive SNHL who received a unilateral traditional CI at Seattle Children’s Hospital between 2009 and 2013 and had follow-up data available up to 24 mo postimplant were included. Data Collection and Analysis: A retrospective chart review was completed. Medical records were reviewed for demographic information, preoperative and postoperative behavioral hearing thresholds, and speech perception scores. Paired t tests were used to analyze speech perception data. Hearing preservation results are reported. Results: Rapid improvement of speech perception scores was observed within the first month postimplant for all participants. Mean monosyllabic word scores were 76% and mean phoneme scores were 86.7% at 1-mo postactivation compared to mean preimplant scores of 19.5% and 31.0%, respectively. Hearing preservation was observed in five participants out to 24-mo postactivation. Two participants lost hearing in both the implanted and unimplanted ear, and received a sequential bilateral CI in the other ear after progression of the hearing loss. One participant had a total loss of hearing in only the implanted ear. Results reported in this article are from the ear implanted first. Bilateral outcomes are not reported. Conclusions: CIs provided benefit for children with steeply sloping bilateral hearing loss for whom hearing aids did not provide adequate auditory access. In our cohort, significant improvements in speech understanding occurred rapidly postactivation. Preservation of residual hearing in children with a traditional CI electrode is possible.

scholarly journals Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness. Comparison Between Children and Adult Populations With Post-lingually Acquired Severe to Profound Hearing Loss

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Falcón Benítez ◽  
Juan Carlos Falcón González ◽  
Ángel Ramos Macías ◽  
Silvia Borkoski Barreiro ◽  
Ángel Ramos de Miguel
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Speech Test ◽  
Deaf Adults ◽  
Common Etiology ◽  
Single Sided Deafness ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Auditory Lateralization

Objective: To determine audiological and clinical results of cochlear implantation (CI) comparing two populations with single-sided deafness (SSD): post-lingually deaf children between 6 and 12 years of age, and post-lingually deaf adults, in order to evaluate the effect of CI in different age groups.Design: Retrospective case review.Setting: Tertiary clinic.Patients and Method: Twenty-three children and twenty-one adult patients that were candidates for CI with single-side deafness were included. In all cases we evaluate: Speech perception thresholds; disyllabic words test (65 dB SPL) were performed in the modalities S0–SCI–SNH and Auditory Lateralization Test. The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire was also used. All results were obtained after 12 months of CI activation.Results: In children, the most common etiology was idiopathic sensory-neural hearing loss. They showed positive results in the Auditory Lateralization Test. In the Speech Test, word recognition in noise improved from 2% preoperatively to 61.1% at a mean follow-up of 1 year (S0 condition) in children [test with signal in CI side 60% and signal normal hearing side (plugged) 31%]. The processor was used for >12 h in all cases. With respect to the SSQ questionnaire, parents were more satisfied within the postoperative period than within the preoperative period. For adults, the most common etiology was idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Positive results in the Auditory Lateralization Test were found. With respect to the Speech Test in quiet conditions: Word recognition in noise improved from 5.7% preoperatively to 71.8% at a mean follow-up of 1 year [test with signal in CI side 68% and signal normal hearing side (plugged) 41%]. The processor was used for >12 h. In the SSQ questionnaire, the post-operative results showed a beneficial effect of the CI. No adverse events were reported during the study period. No differences were found between children and adults in all tests in this study.Conclusions: Cochlear implantation in post-lingually deaf adults and children with SSD can achieve a speech perception outcome comparable with CI in conventional candidates. Improvements in spatial hearing were also observed. Careful patient selection and counseling regarding potential benefits are important to optimize outcomes.

Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Adults with Unilateral Hearing Loss

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 259-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret T. Dillon ◽  
Emily Buss ◽  
Meredith A. Rooth ◽  
English R. King ◽  
Ellen J. Deres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss ◽  
Behavioral Measures ◽  
Speech Perception In Noise ◽  
Contralateral Ear

Objective: Patients with moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in 1 ear and normal hearing in the contralateral ear, known as unilateral hearing loss (UHL) or single-sided deafness (SSD), may experience improved quality of life with the use of a cochlear implant (CI) in the affected ear. Quality of life assessment before and after implantation may reveal changes to aspects of hearing beyond those explicitly evaluated with behavioral measures. Methods: The present report completed 2 experiments investigating quality of life outcomes in CI recipients with UHL. The first experiment assessed quality of life during the 1st year of device use with 3 questionnaires: the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ), the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Twenty subjects were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-activation. Quality of life results were compared over the study period using traditional scoring methods and the SSQ pragmatic subscales. Subscales specific to localization and speech perception in noise were compared to behavioral measures at the preoperative and 12-month intervals. The 2nd experiment evaluated quality of life preoperatively and at the 12-month interval for CI recipients with UHL and CI recipients with bilateral hearing loss, including conventional CI users and those listening with electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). The 3 cohorts differed in CI candidacy criteria, including the amount of residual hearing in the contralateral ear. Results: For subjects with moderate-to-profound UHL, receipt of a CI significantly improved quality of life, with benefits noted as early as 1 month after initial activation. The UHL cohort reported less perceived difficulty at the pre- and postoperative intervals than the conventional CI and EAS cohorts, which may be due to the presence of the normal-hearing ear. Each group experienced a significant benefit in quality of life on the APHAB with CI use. Conclusions: Cochlear implantation in cases of substantial UHL may offer significant improvements in quality of life. Quality of life measures revealed a reduction in perceived tinnitus severity and subjective improvements in speech perception in noise, spatial hearing, and listening effort. While self-report of difficulties were lower for the UHL cohort than the conventional CI and EAS cohorts, subjects in all 3 groups reported an improvement in quality of life with CI use.

scholarly journals Predicting Sequential Cochlear Implantation Performance: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 356-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvette E. Smulders ◽  
Thomas Hendriks ◽  
Robert H. Eikelboom ◽  
Inge Stegeman ◽  
Peter L. Santa Maria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Hearing Aid Use ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Expected Benefits ◽  
Negative Factors

This systematic review of the literature reveals which pre­operative factors affect sequential cochlear implantation outcomes in adults. The findings can help health care prof­essionals provide evidence-based advice on the expected benefits from a second cochlear implant (CI). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database from November 1977 to August 26, 2017, using the terms “sequential cochlear implantation”; the most frequently cited predictors for unilateral cochlear implantation performance and other potential predictors for sequential implantation outcome; and “speech perception,” “localization” as well as synonyms of all of the above. Ten studies were included. The effects of age, duration of hearing loss, time between implantations, preoperative hearing, etiology of hearing loss, hearing aid use and duration of follow-up on sequential cochlear implantation performance were studied. The literature has shown that duration of deafness, age at onset of deafness, etiology of hearing loss, and preoperative speech perception score are (inversely) related to unilateral cochlear implantation outcome in adults. One would expect that these factors would also affect sequential bilateral implantation outcome. However, the best available evidence to date shows that advanced age, a long duration of deafness, or a long interval between implantations should not be considered negative factors when considering sequential bilateral cochlear implantation.

scholarly journals Implantable Prosthesis of Osseous Conduction (BAHA): Case Report

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (02) ◽  
pp. 249-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurico Buschle ◽  
Rita de Cássia Mendes ◽  
André Luiz Ataíde ◽  
Rodrigo Pereira ◽  
Trissia Maria Farah Vassoler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Otitis Externa ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
National Agency ◽  
Severe Hearing Loss ◽  
Mixed Hearing Loss ◽  
Auditory Rehabilitation ◽  
Degree Of Satisfaction

Summary Introduction: The implantable prosthesis of osseous conduction (BAHA) is deemed to be an excellent option in the auditory rehabilitation of patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss, unilaterally or bilaterally, and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. It has been a good advantage over the conservative bone conduction apparatus and those of individual sound-amplifier apparatus (ISAA), when their usage becomes unfeasible because of chronic otitis externa, which has a hard clinic control. Objective: To introduce the first BAHA case performed in Brazil, as duly authorized by ANVISA (National Agency for Sanitary Surveillance), to rehabilitate the mixed hearing loss with occurrences of chronic otitis externa. Method: 50-year-old female patient with right-ear moderate and left-ear severe hearing loss, bilateral tinnitus derived from otosclerosis, was submitted to 04 surgeries of stapedotomy and unable to use ISAA as a result of otorrhea and bilateral otalgia. The medical and audiological evaluation indicated the benefit of using BAHA. Having surgery been performed and BAHA implemented, the patient showed a significant improvement in audiometric thresholds, speech perception and distinction, as well as she declared to be extremely satisfied with the esthetic factor. Final commentaries: BAHA surgical process is safe, simple and swift, thus providing excellent audiological results and a higher degree of satisfaction to patients.

Delaying Cochlear Implantation Impacts Postoperative Speech Perception of Nontraditional Pediatric Candidates

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Lisa R. Park ◽  
Elizabeth L. Perkins ◽  
Jennifer S. Woodard ◽  
Kevin D. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Delay Time ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Progressive Hearing Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Significant Regression ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> As pediatric cochlear implant (CI) candidacy expands, children with greater degrees of residual hearing are receiving CIs. These nontraditional candidates have audiometric thresholds that meet adult manufacturer labeling but are better than current pediatric guidelines allow. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of delayed cochlear implantation on speech perception in nontraditional pediatric CI recipients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Pediatric CI recipients with a history of progressive hearing loss and a preoperative 4-frequency pure-tone average of ≤75 dB HL at the time of implantation were considered for this retrospective study. Preoperative serial audiograms and word recognition scores were reviewed, and a method was created to establish a date when each individual ear 1st met nontraditional candidacy. The length of time between the date of candidacy and implantation was calculated and defined as the “delay time.” A multiple linear regression investigated delay time, age at surgery, surgery type (1st vs. 2nd side), and array type as predictive factors of maximum postoperative Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores. A one-way ANCOVA was performed comparing the postoperative CNC scores between subjects grouped by delay time. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A significant regression was found (<i>F</i>(4, 38) = 5.167, <i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.353). Both age at implantation (<i>p</i> = 0.023) and delay time (<i>p</i> = 0.002) predicted CNC word scores. Longer delay time was associated with poorer word recognition scores, while older age at implantation correlated with higher CNC word scores in this progressive hearing loss group. A significant difference was noted between subjects implanted with &#x3c;1 year of delay and those with 3 or more years of delay (<i>p</i> = 0.003). All ears implanted within a year of candidacy achieved word recognition abilities that are generally accepted as above average (<i>M</i> = 84.91). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> CI candidacy for adults has evolved to allow for greater degrees of residual hearing, while audiometric guidelines for children have not changed since 2000. Our findings suggest that delay of cochlear implantation, even for children with significant levels of residual hearing, leads to poorer outcomes. Modified candidacy guidelines for children should be established to expedite referral to multidisciplinary CI teams and minimize delays in this population.

scholarly journals Cochlear implantation for bilateral severe hearing loss after a single administration of cisplatin: A case report

Toukeibu Gan ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
Shingo Kinoshita ◽  
Mutsuko Hara ◽  
Kazuhiro Mitsumura ◽  
Masami Osaki ◽  
Eikichi Tokunaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Single Administration ◽  
Severe Hearing Loss

scholarly journals Cochlear implantation in Van der Hoeve de Kleyn syndrome with severe hearing loss and deafness

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 94-101
Author(s):  
Kh. M. Diab ◽  
◽  
N. A. Daikhes ◽  
V. S. Korvyakov ◽  
A. A. Kaibov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Type I Collagen ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Connective Tissue Disorder ◽  
Type I ◽  
Diagnostic Features ◽  
Severe Hearing Loss ◽  
Temporal Bones

Van der Hoove syndrome is an inherited genetically determined generalized connective tissue disorder characterized by the formation of „pathologically immature type I collagen“. The literature describes the results of cochlear implantation in patients with van der Howe syndrome, after which there are often complications both intraoperative and postoperative. This article describes two clinical cases of van der Howe syndrome with severe hearing loss and deafness. In cases described: preoperative diagnosis and features of the surgical stage of cochlear implantation and postoperative results. Diagnostic features – thinning of bone tissue according to CT of temporal bones, expansion of cochlear duct, deafness according to tonal threshold audiometry. Cochlear implantation performed with the use of the endotracheal anesthesia under the control of the microscope, straight electrode grids were used, testing was normal. A distinctive feature of this syndrome is the softness of the cochlea’s bone tissue, the danger is that when the electrode array is inserted, it may fall outside the cochlea. Also, during the first connection or later, there may be pathological stimulation of the facial nerve.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document