Enhanced recovery after surgery in head and neck surgery: Reduced opioid use and length of stay

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 1227-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny B. Jandali ◽  
Deborah Vaughan ◽  
Michael Eggerstedt ◽  
Ashwin Ganti ◽  
Holly Scheltens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Opioid Use

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies: possible advantages also for head and neck surgery patients?

2013 ◽  
Vol 271 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Bianchini ◽  
Stefano Pelucchi ◽  
Antonio Pastore ◽  
Carlo V. Feo ◽  
Andrea Ciorba
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery

scholarly journals Machine learning models to predict length of stay and discharge destination in complex head and neck surgery

Head & Neck ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khodayar Goshtasbi ◽  
Tyler M. Yasaka ◽  
Mehdi Zandi‐Toghani ◽  
Hamid R. Djalilian ◽  
William B. Armstrong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Discharge Destination ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (09) ◽  
pp. 695-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol E. Soteropulos ◽  
Sherry Y.Q. Tang ◽  
Samuel O. Poore
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction

Background Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) principles have received focused attention in breast reconstruction. Many protocols have been described in the literature for both autologous and alloplastic reconstruction. This systematic review serves to better characterize successful ERAS protocols described in the literature for potential ease of adoption at institutions desiring implementation. Methods A systematic review of ERAS protocols for autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction was conducted using Medline, the Cochrane Database, and Web of Science. Results Eleven cohort studies evaluating ERAS protocols for autologous (n = 8) and alloplastic (n = 3) breast reconstruction were included for review. The majority compared with a retrospective cohort of traditional perioperative care. All studies described the full spectrum of implemented ERAS protocols including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care. Most frequently reported significant outcomes were reduced length of stay and opioid use with ERAS implementation. No significant change in major complication or readmission rate was demonstrated. Conclusion Based on this systematic review, several core elements that make up a successful perioperative enhanced recovery protocol for breast reconstruction have been identified. Elements include patient counseling and education, limited preoperative fasting, appropriate thromboprophylaxis and antibiotic prophylaxis dependent on reconstructive method, preoperative antiemetics, multimodal analgesia and use of local anesthetic, goal-directed intravenous fluid management, prompt removal of drains and catheters, early diet advancement, and encouragement of ambulation postoperatively. Implementation of ERAS protocols in both autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction can positively enhance patient experience and improve outcomes by reducing length of stay and opioid use, without compromising successful reconstructive outcomes.

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway to Reduce Inpatient Opioid Consumption after Cesarean Delivery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared L. Tepper ◽  
Olivia M. Harris ◽  
Jourdan E. Triebwasser ◽  
Stephanie H. Ewing ◽  
Aasta D. Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Adjusted Relative Risk ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
The Impact

Objective Opioid prescription after cesarean delivery is excessive and can lead to chronic opioid use disorder. We assessed the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on inpatient opioid consumption after cesarean delivery. Study Design An ERAS pathway was implemented as a quality improvement initiative in December 2019. Preintervention (PRE) data were collected from March to May 2019 to assess baseline opioid consumption. Postintervention (POST) data were collected from January to March 2020. The primary outcome was inpatient postoperative opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included the consumption of any opioids, postpartum length of stay, and opioid prescription at discharge. Results A total of 92 women were in the PRE group and 91 were in the POST group. Inpatient opioid consumption decreased by 87.3% from PRE to POST, from 124.7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 10–181.6) MME to 15.8 (IQR: 0–75) MME (p < 0.001). There was no difference in median postpartum length of stay (3.4 days PRE vs. 3.3 days POST; p = 0.12). The proportion of women who did not consume any opioids increased by 75.4% from PRE to POST (p = 0.02). The proportion of women discharged with an opioid prescription decreased by 25.6% from PRE to POST (p = 0.007), despite no formal change to prescribing practices. After adjustment for differences in race/ethnicity and gravidity, there was still a reduction in total inpatient opioid consumption (p < 0.001) and an increase in the proportion of women not consuming any opioids (adjusted relative risk (RR): 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18–3.87), but the difference in rate of prescription of opioids at discharge was no longer statistically significant (adjusted RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48–1.02). Conclusion Adoption of an ERAS pathway for cesarean delivery resulted in a marked reduction in inpatient opioid consumption. Such a pathway can be implemented across institutions and may be a powerful tool in combating the opioid epidemic. Key Points

scholarly journals Reduction of Postoperative Opioid Use After Elective Spine and Peripheral Nerve Surgery Using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3283-3291
Author(s):  
Tracy M Flanders ◽  
Joseph Ifrach ◽  
Saurabh Sinha ◽  
Disha S Joshi ◽  
Ali K Ozturk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
Nerve Surgery

Abstract Objective Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have previously been shown to be feasible and safe in elective spinal procedures. As publications on ERAS pathways have recently emerged in elective neurosurgery, long-term outcomes are limited. We report on our 18-month experience with an ERAS pathway in elective spinal surgery. Methods A historical cohort of 149 consecutive patients was identified as the control group, and 1,141 patients were prospectively enrolled in an ERAS protocol. The primary outcome was the need for opioid use one month postoperation. Secondary outcomes were opioid and nonopioid consumption on postoperative day (POD) 1, opioid use at three and six months postoperation, inpatient pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, postoperative Foley catheter use, mobilization/ambulation on POD0–1, length of stay, complications, and intensive care unit admissions. Results There was significant reduction in use of opioids at one, three, and six months postoperation (38.6% vs 70.5%, P &lt; 0.001, 36.5% vs 70.9%, P &lt; 0.001, and 23.6% vs 51.9%, P = 0.008) respectively. Both groups had similar surgical procedures and demographics. PCA use was nearly eliminated in the ERAS group (1.4% vs 61.6%, P &lt; 0.001). ERAS patients mobilized faster on POD0 compared with control (63.5% vs 20.7%, P &lt; 0.001). Fewer patients in the ERAS group required postoperative catheterization (40.7% vs 32.7%, P &lt; 0.001). The ERAS group also had decreased length of stay (3.4 vs 3.9 days, P = 0.020). Conclusions ERAS protocols for all elective spine and peripheral nerve procedures are both possible and effective. This standardized approach to patient care decreases opioid usage, eliminates the use of PCAs, mobilizes patients faster, and reduces length of stay.

Assessment of Preoperative Functional Status Prior to Major Head and Neck Surgery: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110193
Author(s):  
Ashley L. Miller ◽  
Andrew J. Holcomb ◽  
Anuraag S. Parikh ◽  
Julianne M. Richards ◽  
Vinay K. Rathi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Reconstructive Procedures

Objective To demonstrate feasibility of a recently developed preoperative assessment tool, the Vulnerable Elders Surgical Pathways and Outcomes Analysis (VESPA), to characterize the baseline functional status of patients undergoing major head and neck surgery and to examine the relationship between preoperative functional status and postoperative outcomes. Study Design Case series with planned data collection. Setting Two tertiary care academic hospitals. Methods The VESPA was administered prospectively in the preoperative setting. Data on patient demographics, ablative and reconstructive procedures, and outcomes including total length of stay, discharge disposition, delay in discharge, or complex discharge planning (delay or change in disposition) were collected via retrospective chart review. VESPA scores were calculated and risk categories were used to estimate risk of adverse postoperative outcomes using multivariate logistic regression for categorical outcomes and linear regression for continuous variables. Results Fifty-eight patients met study inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age was 66.4 (11.9) years, and 58.4% of patients were male. Nearly one-fourth described preoperative difficulty in either a basic or instrumental activity of daily living, and 17% were classified as low functional status (ie, high risk) according to the VESPA. Low functional status did not independently predict length of stay but was associated with delayed discharge (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; 95% CI, 1.2-21.3; P = .030) and complex discharge planning (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.34-24.2; P = .018). Conclusion The VESPA can identify major head and neck surgical patients with low preoperative functional status who may be at risk for delayed or complex discharge planning. These patients may benefit from enhanced preoperative counseling and more comprehensive discharge preparation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document