In reference tothe usefulness of the stay suture technique in tracheostomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (12) ◽  
pp. E394-E394
Author(s):  
Satvinder Singh Bakshi
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 326-329
Author(s):  
Satoru SHIMIZU ◽  
Shigeyuki OSAWA ◽  
Hiroki KURODA ◽  
Hiroyuki KOIZUMI ◽  
Takahiro MOCHIZUKI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1082
Author(s):  
ArunKumar Srivastava ◽  
Deepak Khatri ◽  
KamleshSingh Bhaisora ◽  
KuntalKanti Das ◽  
VedPrakash Maurya ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (12) ◽  
pp. E395-E395
Author(s):  
Sang Ha Lee ◽  
Kyung Hee Kim ◽  
Seung Hoon Woo
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. 1356-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang H. Lee ◽  
Kyung H. Kim ◽  
Seung H. Woo
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wu ◽  
R. Benedict ◽  
A. Caycedo-Marulanda

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-wei Pan ◽  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Xing-wei Jin ◽  
Xiao Liu ◽  
Wei-chao Tu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is proposed a new running suture technique called Needle Adjustment Free (NAF) technique, or PAN suture. The efficiency and the safety were evaluated in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Methods This new running suture technique avoids the Needle Adjustment method used in traditional techniques. The new continuous suture technique (11 patients) was compared with the traditional continuous suture method (33 patients) used in both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in terms of suture time (ST), warm ischemia time (WIT), blood loss (BL), open conversion rate and post-op discharge time, post-op bleeding, post-op DVT, ΔGFR (affected side, 3 months post-op). Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. Results ST in the PAN suture group was 30.37 ± 16.39 min, which was significant shorter (P = 0.0011) than in the traditional technique group which was 13.68 ± 3.33 min. WIT in the traditional technique group was 28.73 ± 7.89 min, while in the PAN suture group was 20.64 ± 5.04 min, P = 0.0028. The BL in entirety in the traditional technique group was 141.56 ± 155.23 mL, and in the PAN suture group was 43.18 ± 31.17 mL (P = 0.0017). BL in patients without massive bleeding in the traditional technique group was significantly greater than in the PAN suture group at 101.03 ± 68.73 mL versus 43.18 ± 31.17 mL (P = 0.0008). The open conversion rate was 0 % in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative discharge time, post-op bleeding, post-op DVT, ΔGFR (affected side, 3 months post-op). Conclusions The NAF running suture technique, or PAN suture, leading to less ST, WIT and BL, which was shown to be more effective and safer than the traditional technique used for LPN. A further expanded research with larger sample size is needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 906-908
Author(s):  
Shingo Kunioka ◽  
Kishu Fujita ◽  
Shizuko Iwasa ◽  
Hiroyuki Kamiya ◽  
Kenji Yamazaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document