Ultrasound Findings in Less Frequent Causes of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 2469-2482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Bianchi ◽  
Douglas F. Hoffman ◽  
Giorgio Tamborrini ◽  
Pierre‐Alexandre Poletti
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Ultrasound findings of carpal tunnel syndrome in a hunter syndrome patient

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-662
Author(s):  
Daniele Coraci ◽  
Chiara Cambise ◽  
Filippo Maria Del Tedesco ◽  
Valter Santilli ◽  
Luca Padua
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Hunter Syndrome ◽  
Syndrome Patient ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Comparison of Ultrasound Findings of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome before and after Corticosteroid Injection

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-198
Author(s):  
Hamid Golmohammadi ◽  
Hossein Saremi ◽  
Abbas Moradi ◽  
Shadi Pakmehr ◽  
Masoud Esnaashari
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Findings in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-99
Author(s):  
Hamid Dehdashti ◽  
Davood Kashipazha ◽  
Fakher Rahim ◽  
Masoud Cina ◽  
Mina Eslami-Moa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Update: Assessing Maximum Medical Improvement in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
James B. Talmage
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Medical Evaluation ◽  
Nerve Recovery ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Permanent impairment cannot be assessed until the patient is at maximum medical improvement (MMI), but the proper time to test following carpal tunnel release often is not clear. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) states: “Factors affecting nerve recovery in compression lesions include nerve fiber pathology, level of injury, duration of injury, and status of end organs,” but age is not prognostic. The AMA Guides clarifies: “High axonotmesis lesions may take 1 to 2 years for maximum recovery, whereas even lesions at the wrist may take 6 to 9 months for maximal recovery of nerve function.” The authors review 3 studies that followed patients’ long-term recovery of hand function after open carpal tunnel release surgery and found that estimates of MMI ranged from 25 weeks to 24 months (for “significant improvement”) to 18 to 24 months. The authors suggest that if the early results of surgery suggest a patient's improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and an examination shows few or no symptoms, the result can be assessed early. If major symptoms and ADL problems persist, the examiner should wait at least 6 to 12 months, until symptoms appear to stop improving. A patient with carpal tunnel syndrome who declines a release can be rated for impairment, and, as appropriate, the physician may wish to make a written note of this in the medical evaluation report.

Clinical Update: Understanding Causation: An Example Using Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mark Melhorn
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Medical Evidence ◽  
Anatomic Structure ◽  
Legal Professionals ◽  
Compensation Systems ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Four Levels

Abstract Medical evidence is drawn from observation, is multifactorial, and relies on the laws of probability rather than a single cause, but, in law, finding causation between a wrongful act and harm is essential to the attribution of legal responsibility. These different perspectives often result in dissatisfaction for litigants, uncertainty for judges, and friction between health care and legal professionals. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) provides an example: Popular notions suggest that CTS results from occupational arm or hand use, but medical factors range from congenital or acquired anatomic structure, age, sex, and body mass index, and perhaps also involving hormonal disorders, diabetes, pregnancy, and others. The law separately considers two separate components of causation: cause in fact (a cause-and-effect relationship exists) and proximate or legal cause (two events are so closely related that liability can be attached to the first event). Workers’ compensation systems are a genuine, no-fault form of insurance, and evaluators should be aware of the relevant thresholds and legal definitions for the jurisdiction in which they provide an opinion. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment contains a large number of specific references and outlines the methodology to evaluate CTS, including both occupational and nonoccupational risk factors and assigning one of four levels of evidence that supports the conclusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document